Dormio: Your activity this game has been composed of
summarizing actions and providing opinions on people only when prodded. The majority of your posts are light fluff. When you do provide opinions you waffle and rehash the points other people have made. Your votes have mostly been
egregious bandwagon hops with the barest reasoning to back them up. If you are not scum I will eat my hat.
##Vote:Dormio*********************************************
Hourai: Hourai has fallen down the rankings to become a close second. I won't repeat the argument about the whole gambit/waffle fiasco because it's been made already, multiple times. But just look at how
he keeps pushing Schezo even as he tries to hammer Doll and surprise lynch Pesco. Sure looks like he was setting Schezo up for the next day's lynch after everybody would be reeling in confusion about the day end results and how Schezo didn't die. I will also note that Hourai never expressed any suspicion of Pesco before - why did he suddenly want to lynch him without giving a single argument?
*********************************************
Edible: Again, you spent D1 tunneling on Pesco and defending yourself. Your D2 was almost all made up of the setup speculation mess that started the day. Seriously, you have maybe
one post for all of D2 that gives any significant opinions, and half of it is answering my question about why you are giving people passes. In fact, now that I look at it, you've managed to post a lot without saying much at all, besides pushing a Pesco lynch and agreeing that Schezo might look bad. Your only reason for making Schezo one of the preferred secondary lynches was this line of reasoning: "My biggest problems D1 with Schezo are his early vote on Shadoweh and his late vote on PX. The timing of his PX vote is what bothers me the most; it's arguably the vote that cemented the lynch." Ah, the good old "timing" argument. Too bad you can apply the timing argument to almost anyone on the wagon!
Oh, and defending yourself, you do that pretty well.
Not an argument, just a logical statement to make. I call to your attention this, in which Bard outright asks all night roles to target me/pesco, including potential investigative roles. Why in the world would he want someone to investigate me, were I fellow scum? Furthermore, why would he suggest that and then use his twist virus on me, which would have directed all actions aimed at me to hit him instead, and vice versa? Any investigative role that targeted me would have, that evening, returned a value of "scum" - because it would have actually hit Bard and no one would have been the wiser. Tell me, what sort of alignment is his power best used on?
WIFOM. We don't know what Bard or your roles are, so who knows what motives scum may have for a twist virus? Speculating the setup is silly and unproductive when we have flips, wagons, and posts to work off of. And it happens to be something that scum like to do.
A sensible mind understands that I have more townie cred right now than almost any living player, through virtue of solid evidence (see above).
The only people with townie cred right now are Shadow and Doll S.
I don't think Iced Fairy is scum for much the same reasons I didn't think you were yesterday and D1.
Can you at least repeat your reasoning? Or is it for the same reason you "cleared" Bardiche?
*********************************************
Iced Fairy: Well, you look better than the three I mentioned above you. You bring a lot of new points to the table, but upon reread a lot of your posts are also full of agreements and throwaway observations, almost as if to say, "I'm here!" Not that this is a bad thing in itself, as Zak said earlier, because you also have content posts to go with the fluff, but I'm keeping an eye on you.
*********************************************
Schezo: I'm too tired to look at you. But yeah, Bard's actions don't clear you by any means. I'll look at you again later.
*********************************************
Doll S. and Shadoweh get clears for reasons I don't need to explain (barring the most ridiculous scum gambit in mafia existence).
*********************************************
the latter might imply hesitation and allowed Bardiche to self-hammer.
Nice misrepresentation of the L-1 Vote by the way. I would have posted earlier if you all hadn't decided to jump on so quickly and cut me every time! It's almost like people jumped wagons without verifying the claim first! This is a non-point and I'm surprised you're even considering it, especially as your unvote came after mine. And no, the idea that Bard would self-hammer never came to my mind, as I'm sure it didn't come to yours.
*********************************************
This post where you don't have an opinion to make
And then this mess of words that was basically a request to talk less.
Did you read the Bard vs. Zak argument? It was essentially blah blah blah blah blah. I started reading it and couldn't anymore because it was making me sick. There's nothing wrong with big posts to get your points across, but the best arguments are concise and get to the point instead of running around in verbal circles. We can discuss this post-game.
*********************************************
Just a note that I will not be around for much of Day 3 (today) due to the day cycle coinciding with midterms. THAT DOES NOT GIVE ME A PASS OF ANY SORT, AND IT SHOULD NOT AFFECT ANY OF THE ARGUMENTS YOU WISH TO MAKE AGAINST ME. I'm just throwing this out there just so you don't start wondering where I've disappeared to.
