Kitten4u lurking through ED1???????? WHAT MADNESS IS THIS?! :V
K4U please exist that would be great. If you lurk as much during this game as the last one I will make it my personal mission to lynch you by Day 2. That goes for all you lurkscum.
I typically only post about three times D1 regardless of alignment. I typically don't have much to say until D2 and I see little point in clogging the thread with useless junk that'll just make rereading later painful. I also do not understand why you think LAL is a valid tactic D1 (it doesn't work like that). I'm just going to chalk this up to being a new player though.
The rest of the post is very silly, but totally townie in my opinion. So much so that I am displeased with the mini-wagon that formed on her.
DollS: I've read the past games with you in them and...Well I think you should actually like play the game this time. :V There will never be conclusive evidence that someone is scum, but we have to try to find them anyway. So go back, read the game, and post some comments on the players. Then pick the person you think is most likely to be scum, post a case, and vote them. There is enough information out there to do this now. I was ninjaed as I was typing this, but I don't really see much of a reason to edit it.
Pesco: Out of the Pesco/Edible exchange I think Edible looks better. Pesco, can you address
this please? The comment he highlighted bothers me and right now it looks like you're trying to back away from it. Looking at the initial post you're only comments about Edible's scumminess were what he highlighted in that post, so I don't really get why you're voting for him?
##Vote Hanged HouraiThat entire post smells funny to me. These points really bother me:
#51: Asks an opinion from Bard on Pesco's post. This achieves nothing. Asking opinions on "lolwut" is not scumhunting and will not benefit town now or ever.
#58: Expects people to show up in a few hours, willing to be patient. This directly contradicts her #42, where she calls out K4U, wanting her to post soon. I'm personally not a fan of these kinds of contradictions.
Considering she just tried way too hard to pull us out of RVS I do not see how continuing to try way too hard to generate discussion is a scummy thing. Explain please?
The second point is just silly. That is not a meaningful contradiction, and I doubt it is a contradiction at all actually. There is nothing wrong with wanting people to show up (though, if you think there is please explain).
I find it rather ironic that most of your case is on Shadoweh trying too hard.
The rest of it just reads as reportery to me.
Conqueror is a close second.
This post is terrible. It said nothing about anything seriously. The next one is a little better, but it's not really enough to make up for the horrible contained in the first. Most of the stuff in there had been said elsewhere by someone else, and the only bit of original content, the things on Dormio, strike me as odd.
I also think Schezo is a little weird for reasons I can't quite put my finger on yet. Being go with the flowish isn't quite it, but close I guess? My ability to language goes away after 11 and I've been working on this post for way too long and it's getting way too long in general. Not willing to lynch him yet, but IGMEOY. I feel about the same way about PX.
For those that want me to post a lot...I'm sorry I guess? It's just not how I roll. I don't like to clutter up the thread with useless nonsense, so I only post when I have something to say. It also takes me like an hour to put up a post (this post took about 2 for the record), so I don't always have time to sit down and put one up. :/
