Author Topic: Mafia Rule Mafia - Postgame, Town Win (Read 103585 times)

Shadoweh · « **Reply #240 on:** March 04, 2011, 06:14:59 AM »

to tasty man i say that it is not the information my role got that leads me to suspect rabbit face of being on the red colored team. it is the fact that targetting him also targetted another player and that player was not you.

i was trying to leak that dead players cause rule effects but rabbit face pointed out what i was doing publicly. i decided later that night to just outright tell everyone how the setup worked.

i do not know if rabbit face can send private messages himself. i only know that we can if he dies.

Edible · « **Reply #241 on:** March 04, 2011, 06:16:34 AM »

Quote from: Shadoweh on March 04, 2011, 06:14:59 AM

to tasty man i say that it is not the information my role got that leads me to suspect rabbit face of being on the red colored team. it is the fact that targetting him also targetted another player and that player was not you.

Color me curious. Was it Bardiche?

GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em · « **Reply #242 on:** March 04, 2011, 06:16:48 AM »

FUCKING S HOW DO THEY WORK Votecount
Pesco (4) - Edible, ????????, Iced Fairy, Shadoweh
Hanged Hourai (0) - ????????, Shadoweh
Polaris (0) - ????????
Doll.S (0) - Schezo
Shadoweh (2) - Pesco, Schezo
Not Voting: ????????
With 11 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. There are currently ~66 hours left in the day.

Pesco · « **Reply #243 on:** March 04, 2011, 06:19:07 AM »

Linking is the active ability. The double-up effect is a passive once the link is established. I don't know what effect my death will allow.

I just rechecked my PM confirmation of the link. Assuming HW isn't a false advertising cunt, there should be no problems on Edible's end.

Pesco · « **Reply #244 on:** March 04, 2011, 06:21:46 AM »

Scum confirmed to be voting me as shown by the vote count.

Shadoweh · « **Reply #245 on:** March 04, 2011, 06:25:15 AM »

i am honestly not sure if i should answer any questions about who the other person is on the grounds that it could mark them for death.

Iced Fairy · « **Reply #246 on:** March 04, 2011, 06:26:53 AM »

... How do you know that?

Iced Fairy · « **Reply #247 on:** March 04, 2011, 06:29:01 AM »

EBWOP: Specifically how do you know who is anon voting? That's a pretty impressive power suite there.....

Edible · « **Reply #248 on:** March 04, 2011, 06:30:49 AM »

I have a very good reason for asking.

pesco didn't target me last night, though it was through no fault of his own.

I recieved a PM addressed to Bardiche, and an ability called "twist" which I'm required to use on someone else today. I can only assume this ability caused people who targeted me to actually target someone else. I also didn't see anything about a doc block from Hourai, which either means the twist out-prioritized the doc shot which supposedly blocks all negative effects, or he's lying.

Ninja:

Quote from: Iced Fairy on March 04, 2011, 06:29:01 AM

EBWOP: Specifically how do you know who is anon voting? That's a pretty impressive power suite there.....

Because I instructed everyone to lay their votes on the table with their first post. Hourai is the only one to have not done so thus far, and there's an anonyvote on pesco. It's just his supposition, but we'll see what happens when all the votes are on the table.

Shadoweh · « **Reply #249 on:** March 04, 2011, 06:41:56 AM »

that makes my entire argument against rabbit face fall to pieces. i did also end up targetting the night ranter last night. if your power works as you say it does tasty man then you were never linked to rabbit face and it is impossible for red doll boy to be telling the truth.

##unvote
##vote hanged hourai

Edible · « **Reply #250 on:** March 04, 2011, 06:50:00 AM »

He's either lying or this is a bastard mod session, yes. Though to be frank I'm leaning toward the latter. Hourai's explanation lines up with pesco's - they both claim to have targeted me successfully, but I received nothing thanks to the twist - so I'm tempted to believe both at the moment. I believe I'll sleep on it.

Pesco · « **Reply #251 on:** March 04, 2011, 07:10:51 AM »

My confirmation was that my linking was successful, it didn't confirm who got it. Now I can go and infer from the number of unique views in the QT if it ended up in a dead person's hands.

Hourai's claim can be reverse engineered from the public info about my role and in this case he would be lying about protecting Edible if my link wasn't to Edible.

## Unvote
## Vote Hourai

It would be quite convenient that you ability is 1-shot so you wouldn't need to prove it again.

Shadoweh · « **Reply #252 on:** March 04, 2011, 07:27:12 AM »

just posting like this is exhausting. what seemed like a clear result and contradiction just turned into giant walls of insanity. now that i believe your roleclaim i would appreciate if rabbit face could explain what he was trying to accomplish on day one. i am also going to rest after this post and wait for the rest of town to form opinions on our discussion tonight.

Iced Fairy · « **Reply #253 on:** March 04, 2011, 07:35:44 AM »

Oi my head. Well at least the new info gives me something.

My votes going nowhere. Pesco you've misrepresented every roleclaim in the game so far, save perhaps your own. Hourai targeted Edible, not you, (along with everyone else in the game it seems like) and as Edible stated, it seems very very likely that protection, and all the attacks and investigations, went to Bardiche. (BTW Bardiche, please explain why you did that. It's not autoscummy behavior, but I'd like to hear in your own words your reasoning.)

Anyway I don't consider an easily moved anon vote to be proof of townhood. (Oh, and Edible assuming Hourai was the likely suspect for dropping that is a little premature, especially given the very high likelyhood of lurkscum. Not that it isn't possible.)

Shadoweh, your misrep here doesn't make you look good. Hourai could be lying, but nothing he's said has been proved false yet. Bardiche should clear that up.

[Watch someone shows up in the morning and drops another role reveal....]

Shadoweh · « **Reply #254 on:** March 04, 2011, 07:47:57 AM »

i am not misrepresenting what red doll boy claimed. red doll boy claimed that he protected tasty man and received a message that he also protected rabbit face. if tasty man is not lying then red doll boy should have been told he protected rabbit face instead of tasty man.

Dormio Ergo Sum · « **Reply #255 on:** March 04, 2011, 09:48:00 AM »

Wow, my uni really doesn't like to let its first years take it easy, huh?
First week, and I already have an assignment worth 20% of one of my courses.
And I know that I'll get another one early next week that is another 20% in a different course.
Anyway, reading the topic now, will follow up with post.

Dormio Ergo Sum · « **Reply #256 on:** March 04, 2011, 10:49:35 AM »

Hiding your vote is pretty scummy.
And currently not voting are Hourai, Doll.S, Zakeri, and Bardiche. (Me too, but I plan to fix that in this post.)
Out of the people I've listed, Hourai has posted but not placed a vote.

I still don't like how Pesco immediately linked Edible.
Nor do I like how Hourai has not placed a public vote.

Also, there's something that I don't like about Hourai's roleclaim.
He said that he protected Edible, and that his protection went over both Edible and Pescar.
But I highly doubt that such specific details would have been sent in the PM, especially with the "twist" in play.

##Vote Hanged Hourai

Dormio Ergo Sum · « **Reply #257 on:** March 04, 2011, 11:05:54 AM »

Quote from: Caedo on March 04, 2011, 10:49:35 AM

But I highly doubt that such specific details would have been sent in the PM, especially with the "twist" in play.

Er, rather, I don't think that the PM would have said anything to suggest that whatever he did would have affected Pesco too since all the actions were switched around.

Bardiche · « **Reply #258 on:** March 04, 2011, 11:51:09 AM »

I should be leaving soon, so I can't leave an extensive post!

I am linked to Pesco. I have no wit of what this will accomplish for either of us. Like, will Pesco being lynched also cause my death?

Shadoweh, your posts are confusing to read. What is the exact nature of your posting restriction? What will happen if you break it? Do you HAVE to use the nicknames? Night Ranter, Rabbit Face, etc?

I raise curious frowns at Schezo. While Day 1 he was not that terrible, I find myself rather leery of his attempts to get a train on Shadoweh going on the basis that Shadoweh anon-voted. As Shadoweh immediately rectified it by public voting, I ill see a need to chide them over this. As such, Schezo's aburd reasons for voting become suspect, and his attempt to paint Shadoweh's curiousity as inherently anti-town is ridiculous.

That he now ignores Shadoweh's commentary and has tunneled nearly exclusively on Shadoweh further raises my ire and cements my desire to cement his feet and toss him in the Dover canal.

##VOTE: Schezo

On matters related to what happened tonight, let me get this straight.

Pesco targeted Edible, but his ability wound up hitting me.
Hourai targeted Edible, but his ability wound up hitting me.
Shadoweh targeted Pesco, and his ability also wound up hitting me.

This is all consistent with Pesco's claim that whatever will occur to him will also occur to me, and so far everyone's claims check out. Including Hourai's.

Iced Fairy, I have no idea what I must have done tonight? My role permits me to talk at night, and another effect I would prefer to keep hidden for now. Heavily insinuating I have anything to do with the buggalboo that happened tonight confuses me. Perhaps you could clarify the grounds for believing I have anything to do with it?

Dormio, that is a blatant bandwagon hop if ever I saw one. Care to elucidate why Hourai must be scum? The conjecture that the anonyvote belongs to Hourai ignores that any of those who haven't voted yet placed that vote on Pesco and have refrained from posting.

Bardiche · « **Reply #259 on:** March 04, 2011, 11:52:29 AM »

could have placed* Derp

Pesco · « **Reply #260 on:** March 04, 2011, 12:01:29 PM »

I'm suspicious of Hourai's action because if his action blocked other effects from happening then my link wouldn't have worked. Also assuming that his ability took effect on Edible, it wouldn't have taken effect on me if my ability was resolved before his.

Dormio Ergo Sum · « **Reply #261 on:** March 04, 2011, 12:23:10 PM »

Quote from: Bardiche on March 04, 2011, 11:51:09 AM

The conjecture that the anonyvote belongs to Hourai ignores that any of those who haven't voted yet placed that vote on Pesco and have refrained from posting.

I'm voting Hourai because I think he's lying in his roleclaim.

Dormio Ergo Sum · « **Reply #262 on:** March 04, 2011, 12:25:24 PM »

Quote from: Bardiche on March 04, 2011, 11:51:09 AM

On matters related to what happened tonight, let me get this straight.

Pesco targeted Edible, but his ability wound up hitting me.
Hourai targeted Edible, but his ability wound up hitting me.
Shadoweh targeted Pesco, and his ability also wound up hitting me.

This is all consistent with Pesco's claim that whatever will occur to him will also occur to me, and so far everyone's claims check out. Including Hourai's.

orz.
Need to not leave out chunks of my post due to bad posting habits and inability to edit.
According to Edible, somebody also did something to you Bardiche, but it hit Edible instead.

Hanged Hourai · « **Reply #263 on:** March 04, 2011, 01:54:41 PM »

Need to go to school in a little while, so can't make a full post.

Here is what my role does and what I know for sure about it:

It protects against all negative effects, including NK.

I protected Edible.

I was told that my protect went over Edible as well as Pesco.

I was told that it did successfully protect something.

And I now have PX"s waffle power.

And yes, I was trying to keep an advantage over scum, but since people don't believe me, I might as well give all the details.

I'm rechargeable. N3, I'm back in business.

And since people want my vote on the table too,

##Vote: Dormio

I would rather vote Shadoweh since she thinks we can't both be town and I know I'm town, but that may result in a premature hammer.

Dormio, you vote me on the basis that you think I can't have gotten notice over who my protection went over?
And also, I think it's cute how you left Conqueror out of your main point.

Also, mod, with 11 left, it takes 7 to lynch? Is that part of the day effect?

Shadoweh · « **Reply #264 on:** March 04, 2011, 02:05:37 PM »

there is another reason for someone to vote for rabbit face if rabbit face is on the red colored team.
the way the rule is written anyone with an anonymous vote on them will not be able to be hammered until the last day.

my posting restriction is hard to explain because there are words i cannot say and common grammar i cannot use. i can call you night ranter or the guy with the red hair or anything that you are not normally called. i do not know what will happen if i break the restriction other then it will cause something bad to happen for the town.

crown boy has been trying to get a train going on me since my first post.

Iced Fairy · « **Reply #265 on:** March 04, 2011, 03:10:49 PM »

Bardiche : I ask because Edible claimed he received an item. I was hoping you knew something about it. I guess it is possible some other friend gave him the item and both of you the swap.

However regardless of that, the scenario plays out, especially if Bardiche is linked to Pesco now. Everyone targeted Edible and Pesco, and instead got Bardiche and Pesco. Except nothing happened because of Hourai.

I'm still voting Pesco because of bad representation and poor scumhunting.

Mentioning I still don't like Schezo's hunting attempts either, though I see some of his points on Shadoweh. Still there's a whole lot of claim misrepresentation there.

Also not liking Caedo's run in, accuse Hourai alone, bail technique. I want to blame the no posters, but I'm up way to early. Still I'd like to see stuff on the table.

Edible's scumhunt tech seems much better the D1 at least.

And Shadoweh is right. Anon votes prevent a lynch, though if we have enough to lynch the anons will be obvious.

Edible · « **Reply #266 on:** March 04, 2011, 03:42:59 PM »

Quote from: Iced Fairy on March 04, 2011, 03:10:49 PM

Bardiche : I ask because Edible claimed he received an item. I was hoping you knew something about it. I guess it is possible some other friend gave him the item and both of you the swap.

Not quite. I received a PM that appeared to be addressed to Bardiche (the contents of which are comically threatening), and an infection.

The infection is called "twist" and, given what happened to Bardiche and I, appears to be somewhat self-explanatory.

I'm starting to think both Shadoweh and Hourai should be avoided as lynch candidates today. Pesco's a little better but he still has the shadow of all that awful anti-town nonsense on D1 hanging over his head. I'll look into everyone else later in the Day. Hate playing mafia on weekends...

Iced Fairy · « **Reply #267 on:** March 04, 2011, 03:56:29 PM »

Ah, an infection. That would make sense then.

Bardiche · « **Reply #268 on:** March 04, 2011, 05:47:30 PM »

Quote from: Shadoweh on March 04, 2011, 02:05:37 PM

i do not know what will happen if i break the restriction other then it will cause something bad to happen for the town.

Specifically worded as such? Then it'd be safe to assume that if your posting restriction is true, there is a scum post restriction role around.

... Edible, do share the contents of the PM, if you're permitted. Who's threatening me and what for? :V

Edible · « **Reply #269 on:** March 04, 2011, 05:51:52 PM »

Yeah, no problem. It's pretty silly though.

Gonna go check to see if I can quote the whole thing. If not, I'll summarize.