Will address the question later.
No, you won't. You voted me over Hero. Either you think I'm worse, which you need to explain
now, or it's completely unjustified.
As for your question:
In
this post, I say how I'm lacking info from PX in order to stabilize my read on him, while presenting enough weird behavior from Hero to warrant a vote. To understand what happened between then and now, let's look at their posts. Starting from Hero's:
Some more random posts that
don't achieve much. Standard fare.
A case on Serela. I said earlier how this seems kind of bad, and to explain this: the accusations are overall random, he doesn't comment on these things earlier but saves it for one big 'everything I can find on you' post (a lot of these posts being from D1), and all this as a combination seems like he was
looking for accusations.
Some actual thoughts
here.
Then there's
this, which I have already commented on. In hindsight, saying he didn't say anything earlier is false according to the former link, but I read it as more of a "I'd lynch Shadoweh over Pesco" post rather than a refusal to lynch either of them. I'm still not happy about that random lynch request, which is a terrible idea. If he cared more, he would have backed up the "we want a big PX wagon instead" posts that were going on 5? hours before deadline. This is, of course, assuming he thought PX was worse than Shadoweh, which I can't really tell based on his posts.
Of course, I wouldn't have been as angry about it if not for
this post, in which he displays how unhappy he is with Shadoweh, still without voting. I would have expected a hammer there, but... did you really stay with your town Shadoweh read after that post, and after stating how you'd remove your former statement? All in all, weird.
D3 begins with these
two posts. The usual questions with no content, but he DOES raise some town concerns.
This case, I do not agree with. A lot of the accusations were bad, and I still read this as a sort of OMGUS for HW's votes. This is after he shifted his vote from HW, to Serela, and how to HW while stating how Serela is acting weird without voting him, since for whatever reason HW suddenly became worse again.
More
questions. Some more useless posts follow, which I get ok-ish vibes from. (got tired of linking every single post...)
And then we have PX's post, starting with
this one that gets cut by mine. He expresses displeasure from Serela following by a vote, saying he'll explain later. Seems like a "hold on, I can actually do contributing but not now, later". And, indeed, later comes a Serela
case with an overview of everything attached. The case is ok, but I don't like how he leaves room to jump on the Shadoweh wagon in the future.
A whole bunch of posts defending against JOB which I am NOT going to link. Some are legit but some are just odd. I'm seeing some of this as unneeded precautions.
He
shows his activity without actually saying/updating anything despite the Pesco/Shadoweh thing. Help?
And
here is the expected Shadoweh vote. He had not updated his thoughts at ALL from that post, which was a while earlier. He said in that post that Pesco was "town scum but green" without explaining and without updating his opinion. Overall looks like "ok, I said stuff about Shadoweh before so now I'm just going to lynch here, I hope no one minds and oh yeah I'm maybe going to explain later maybe not".
And where's the explanation? It doesn't come. Instead we have
here a post in which he mistakes my sarcasm for an accusation and immediately defends himself. Honestly, I think even Pesco saw the sarcasm and replied assuming it wasn't. I see this as another case of too much defense.
And that's it. Nothing more from D2. He was showing activity despite not presenting enough clarification/reiteration to his (very little) points and while not responding to the many accusations on him despite those of JOB, which were very easy to defend against. I was really, really not satisfied with this. Then comes D3:
A
return to the Serela case, in which he presents a lot of coincidental accusations (being on the wrong wagons, not being connected to the NKs) among other shaky accusations. Is this honestly the worst scum you could have found? What about explaining your read about everyone else? You'd put Dormio as "town leaning neutral still..." without explaining why, and giving Hero the benefit of the doubt similarly to what Hero did with Shadoweh... yeah, seriously? Oh, and a request to policy lynch JOB. Don't get me started on how much this annoyed me. And that's his only post up to now, too. All the others were
this and
that, which show signs of activity and nothing else. He also still doesn't respond to anyone's accusations (but JOB's ?).
tl;dr
I don't like either of them. They both have weird votes and weird cases, along with behavior I don't see as town behavior. What's the difference, then? Hero actually posts more. He questions plenty of players, potentially putting him at risk. This is not something I'm seeing from PX. Most of his replies have been to people like JOB, when there are obviously other people who are addressing him more than JOB. I also see signs of over-defensiveness. He lurks, looks for easy replies and easy cases, and to top it all off he's being defensive. Hero is slightly more daring, like he has less to lose, and this is the difference I'm seeing.
My opinion on Hero didn't change overall from my vote on him on D2. My opinion on PX, though, did. I saw him as neutral-maybe-scum, but now I see him as scum. This warranted the change in opinion and vote. Is this to your satisfaction?
Cut by a big Dormio post.
