As promised, A BIG WALL OF TEXT.
---
Dormio: Eh... I can't say "no content" because he did have some sort of argument against ActionDan. Albeit, that's the only big case he had. All the others were "small pickings" (yes, I have no problem admitting this), which is what makes me want to see more content. It also doesn't look very good, almost like a sort of "ok, I made some cases, now I can stop contributing to the town" attitude. And I'm going to slam my head into somthing if I see another troll post. Neutral-.
huh what: About Omba's claim that you "haven't gotten your hands dirty", I... agree. You've had some helpful and calculated posts, but I'm not sure how huge your contribution to the town really is, and like Omba explained, this kind of behavior could easily be explained by being scum. However, this can also have other explanations (like anything else in mafia), and the little posts he did make are posts I can really agree with. Others posts just raise really interesting conclusions. #180 and #205, for example. In the former, he raises a good point about the Omba vs Schezo incident which I fully agree on. In the latter, he raises a good point against the ActionDan wagon. Notice how both of these players were revealed to be town. Why, I ask you, would scum mitigate rolls against not one but two non-scum? Town.
Bardiche: All of his cases (scratch that-- all of his posts) up to now were pretty well-made. Aside from his first case against Shadoweh, maybe, which I still think was kind of dragged-on, but nothing scummy overall. He was always looking at more than one guy (aka, the opposite of tunneling). His posts were very convinving imo, something that would kind of make a good NK target, but like stuff that's already been said, "NK anal" will bring nothing but WIFOM at this stage, and I agree. (Hell, I think Bard himself was the one to say this) Town.
Omba: Definitely a "village leader" vibe, but not one I'm 100% happy of. For someone who posts so much content, the number of players this content refers to is tiny in comparison. This is why people have been accusing Omba of tunnelling in the past, and although it isn't 100% accurate, the accusation's definitely got some kind of reason for existing. I feel like, once he finds a 'prime' scum pick, he just sticks onto him until something major happens, like the general consensus on that player changing. Kind of like what happened with Schezo. Really, I do agree with most if not all of your content, but the way you're doing it all worries me. Neutral+.
Pesco: Very very similar to Omba in that I agree with most of his content, but the way he plays kind of bugs me. In comparison to Omba, he posts much less content but that's usaully enough. My 'problem' here is not the semi-tunnelling, which partially exists here too (how he was head-on agaisnt Dan from the instance the Schezo incident ended up to the day's conclusion), but the fact that several people had accused him in the duration of the game and his responses were either lacking, stupid or nonexistent. Examples include #97/#98 and #275 (of course)(he instead chooses to reply to his much weaker-based panic posts). Hell, I bet this won't get much attention as well, only proving my point. If you think the accusations lack actual content/reasoning, go ahead and explain why. Don't dismiss them entirely and THEN tell us they're "bad accusations" whe n you're questioned about them. What also annoys me is his consistency at pointing out scummy behavior but almost never expanding on these accusations. This is something I'd call common behavior for a chaos-inducing scum. This usually isn't enough to scream 'scum', but I have other things bugging me which I have yet to identify. Honestly, if not for the exceptionally good content, I probably would have been making a case right about now. Neutral but UGH.
Serela: I honestly can't think of a verdict here. Too little posts, too little influence, too little contribution. Neutral.
PX: Ugh, I don't know. Some of his posts are insightful, some are just plain weird, and some are flat out bandwagoning. I think the reason I don't really have an opinion I can be sure of yet is the fact you've yet to make ONE CASE the entire game. So I suggest you get to that. Neutral-.
Hero999: EXTRAODRINARY CONFUSION. Some of his posts are glaringly bandwagonous, the others I simply can't tell because they confuse me so much. I tried going over his 10 or so posts a few times and I STILL don't understand most of them. And, unless I'm mistaken, and this isn't a result of this confusion, you've not made a single case all game (excluding what might be a very vague huh what case a bit earlier today). Instead, I can identify posts filled mostly (or fully) with questions that only make the town lose progress (questioning the actions of several players at the same time without any huge progress promised in any of them). And if I'm not mistaken, some of these posts went on even near the D1 deadline. Again, I might be exaggerating here, but the combination of little posts along with massive confusion is one I really don't like. I can't, however, claim that you are "absolutely scum". So, Neutral--.
JOB: His 'cases' aren't stellar at all. In fact, I probably disagree with most of them. But he is actively making his opinion known and imo isn't showing any signs of LOOK AT ME I'M SCUM, so it's all good. Honestly don't have much to say here. Neutral+.
Shadoweh: Let's see. At first I had a high opinion here. Then came some kind-of-ill-explained cases along with posts that never really made any breathtaking progress. Still, she was neutral at worst, seeing as I really liked the activity and that there wasn't anything overly scum-like in her posts. Then came the weird shift in vote near the deadline, and I think Bardiche (388#) explains this nicely. Nothing to say here but "I agree with this post", as I really do. Expanding on this myself won't bring to anything new anyway, so I won't bother. Kind of a bad opinion currently, but it could be worse. Neutral-.
---
Alright, you might have noticed no 'Scum' and plenty of 'Neutral-'. Well, that's because 1) I'm naturally indicisive and 2) I really don't have a scum pick I'm completely fine with. Despite this, I'm probably the most fine with Hero999, so ##Vote Hero999.
Pesco, there's another thing that bugs me that I didn't mention above. Namely-- what you were doing with me in these last few posts. At first, you fling a dumb case at me. I respond, and you fling yet another case at me. And then you do it AGAIN. If you have something against me, just do it in one big case. There should be no reason for this stupid shenanigan. You're either toying with me, testing me, or just being outright dumb.
