//An hour of no comments on it would be unwell with people that are gone or asleep. However, with how hazardous situations are handled in this, i.e., bad (or more) feelings, feedback on a post will just spice it up in exchange for longer waiting times. So, in the end, if you have time for a dish (me not parsing at the moment), go ahead and try, but if not, it's better to leave it plain and still edible.
//People being asleep or otherwise indisposed is part of the "sometimes the world turns keeps turning without us" statement, and is why I don't complain whenever I wake up to ~20 new posts. I would also argue that, in this most recent case, getting feedback and waiting for more people actively made the situation worse - if Naz's original note had been forwarded along when it was originally proposed I imagine the current mess would not have come to pass. At the very least, waiting for more people and more feedback certainly didn't make things
better.
//Well I'm mostly asking for it because if this idea screws up, worst case scenario (and knowing how my commands seem to go when compared to everyone else's *shot*) it will screw everything up, so I just want to make sure I'm doing it right.
//Well, this is going to be awkward since it's you specifically saying this, and no matter my efforts to claim this is intended to be impersonal, I imagine it won't be fully taken as impersonal. But the parser also brought up lack of faith in oneself, so I think it's worth posting regardless.
//Speaking
strictly in impersonal terms, if one is not confident in their actions, especially during high-pressure situations, then frankly, one should not be submitting those actions at all. If the person behind actions doesn't believe in them, then why should anyone else? All players should either have confidence in their actions and own the consequences or step to the side so people that do have confidence in their actions can take care of business. Otherwise we're all just stuck with delays and hand-wringing.
//This is, of course, not to say that one needs a fool-proof plan up-front, and, in fact, it's exceedingly unlikely that a fool-proof plan is even possible up-front, to the point that expecting one is foolish. Things can certainly be taken one step at a time, since each new step provides new information. What this means, though, is that not having an immediate complete solution should not instill fear of failure.
//Also because I feel that if we don't fix that situation, the ideal ending (which affects 3/4 players) would be forever tainted due to how we've characterized Daiyousei over the course of this wild ride.
//I'm guessing I'm the 1? Since I don't think that (a) the cops and their livelihoods are at all our responsibility, (b) the cops and their livelihoods have any bearing on the significance of a hypothetical wedding, or (c) Mikey is in any further danger (though this last one could be argued now that trying to monitor them has directly led in them getting suspicious). What difference do the cops really make at this point?
----
LadyBug:
> Think of whether or not Luna enjoys all the squeezing.
> Think of whether or not Luna enjoys the effects of the poking.
> Continue poking and squeezing.
LunaDai:
> Nod.
> "I think so. And if they attack anyway, you could probably stop them without even trying!"
---
YamaBug:
> Stop the growth.
> (F) I wonder if Kisume could live in there if it grew big enough.
---
DoreBug:
> Continue perpetual off-screen eating.