Something!
VgT - Honestly? I like VgT. He's consise, and I agree with just about everything he says.
Might be needless nitpicking since it happened during ED1, but whatever happened to your slight suspicion of him from earlygame? Was it just because he seemed to drop the pressure on me that you claimed to dislike? You didn't actually say anything positive about him on D1, so this opinion feels like a complete 180 to me.
Affinity - Again, my idea with Affinity is that if he was scum he'd know Bob was Town, and therefore he'd have no reason to draw attention to himself by switching over to him at the last moment. This argument doesn't hold if Schezo is scum, but I've already said why I don't think that's happening about a dozen times.
This... honestly seems like you're clearing him over WIFOM. What is it about Affinity's action that makes it look townie-ish rather than a null tell, provided that Schezo is town like he is in your hypothetical scenario? Sure, the voteswitch might draw slight attention on principle, but it is not nearly enough to support an entire case on Affinity, and if both wagons are townie, then it's not going to cast him in a particularly good or bad light after Schezo's flip since it provides no tactical advantage to scum yet could be an attempt to come across as having more believably existant opinions. So how does this boil down to more than a WIFOM-y null tell as is, especially in your hypothetical scenario that Schezo will flip town? The only way I can see it possibly giving us information on Affinity's alignment is if Schezo flips scum, but you still seem to be clearing him over the fast wagon that never flipped, sooo.
Now that I have that out of the way,
--- Results of Hourai re-read:
* Personally feeling that Hourai's questioning #71 had townie intent, although he came off incredibly misguided. It does, however, seem odd that he never chose to follow up on them, and how he never elaborated on why he thought VgT was active lurking when I said I disagreed. It seems somewhat like there's a huge gap between his #71 and his #87 where he votes Schezo that he never filled, and comes off as if he is ditching his past opinions to jump on Schezo's wagon. Not too fond of this, although I would rather wait for a Schezo flip before actually declaring it scummy.
* His flipflop from "I want Schezo dead regardless of alignment" to "I guess Schezo is kind of scummy" to "I think Schezo is scum" over the span of three of his own posts still bugs me, and it does not help that he never responded to me when I pressed him on it. What was up with that, Hourai?
* Tunneling on Schezo with double standards is pretty ehhh, but doesn't seem too uncharacteristic for a newbie (I seem to recall going after my d1 target throughout the entirety of d2 for the exact same reasons myself, but whatever), and at least comes off as believable since his case on Schezo isn't really that poor. It is irritating that he never addressed why he was letting himself off on a double standard while pressuring Schezo over jumping on a wagon while adding nothing, though.
* Not an issue with Hourai himself, but:
In any case, I do agree with his observation that Schezo is primarily playing a wait-and-see game with minimal pressure and maximum active lurking (IIoA), a scum winning strategy, which seems like a sharp and original observation that scum need not make.
Okay, I don't know if I was just not very thorough at all when re-reading, but I never actually saw Hourai make this observation. Sure, Hourai said that Schezo is scummy for failing to put proper pressure on reVelske, but I cannot seem to find a post where he goes that in-depth or even brings active lurking / IIoA into the matter. Could you link me to what you are talking about? (Or maybe you just interpreted his posts in a different manner, I don't know.)
--- Results of Schezo re-read:
* Probably been said a million times by now, but man his post #58 looks really bad in light of Bob's flip. He sets the townie wagon into motion, adds nothing new to the case, votes somebody for being a "liability for the town", and has his entire post consist of parroting Bard and Pesco. All of this is bad for reasons I should not need to explain, but basically it looks like he's scum going for an easy wagon jump. It is also notable that he never mentioned the suspicion he appeared to have on me in that post ever again, which is a little odd.
* His defense of Bob (which makes no sense since he was voting Bob as well) reads... really oddly to me and seems like Schezo is pretty much stating the obvious. "Townies don't want to lynch power roles!" Well, durr. I also think the post reads a little like he expected Bob to be town, which is awful considering the vote.
* Hourai vote reads as... a rather weak OMGUS, actually, and it seems as if he is trying to dodge having to defend himself completely in #147. Yes, Schezo, Hourai wanted you to defend yourself, but it's not like you can't scumhunt and defend yourself at the same time, so the "Hourai is pressuring people into defending themselves and getting town nowhere" argument is pretty bad.
* The end of #150 is basically saying "I'm going to keep voting Hourai until he switches off of me" which is ughhh. Using threats to stop people from pressuring you in lieu of an actual defense, much?
Looking at the two side by side, I think I would much rather see Schezo lynched. Hourai had a couple of bad screw-ups, sure, but Schezo's mistakes are not only more plentiful, but also more downright scummy than Hourai's which often come off as if they could just as easily be newbie derp. The case on Schezo is also a lot more concrete as well, as we have a townie flip on the wagon he jumped while we do not have such a luxury when attempting to read Hourai.
##Unvote##Vote Schezo as a tie-breaker, since it doesn't seem like a Rou lynch is happening today and I might not be around for the deadline