Author Topic: DEFCON Mafia (Night 2, DEFCON 2)  (Read 110771 times)

Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #390 on: March 18, 2013, 06:32:59 AM »
meanwhile nnr's reaction to me voting him is to stop pushing the case on me entirely, ignore my case on /him/ and sideline on shadoweh because nobody is paying him attention (aside from the people who think he's town or "bad but not worth lynching" because ______)

can we just lynch him already and be done with it? for fuck's sake his only response to my vote on him was to say i was turning around my reads to vote him, even though i had explained why i didn't want to vote dan anymore, been suspecting him for most of the day, and obviously had a stronger case on him than rawr. he is not even reading the posts of the person he's voting or trying to push his case.

Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #391 on: March 18, 2013, 06:50:51 AM »
bt's posts do not contain anything in particular that makes me think he is a MEMBER of the MAFIA but he doesn't really look townie either. obviously the "scum decided to avoid accountability for the roleblock" logic doesn't follow now that i remember sk might steal too

ihnn's recent posts have been awful, what the hell. "there is probably at least one non-town in Raikaria/Shadoweh" is arbitrary as fuck. i am not sure how i missed this previously given that i actually have been reading the game. the rest of his posts felt like struggling town but he reaaaally needs to explain the random raikaria/shadoweh dichotomy. "at least one non-town" implies he thinks a mutual scumbus is possible which is even more confusing

rawr still hasn't tried to look for scum intent even once. px is awful for reasons that are self-explanatory but i'm not feeling him as scum as much as rawr.

these last few posts have been my opinions on basically everybody except the dudes i am leaning town on. i will give zak a special mention because i think he's the most likely to just be scum well but none of his posts read scummy to me

Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #392 on: March 18, 2013, 06:51:55 AM »
"be playing scum well", even

Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #393 on: March 18, 2013, 06:53:38 AM »
NNR's first case on Raikaria was good, provided decent case, and decent read on Dan and HW respectively, I guess in general I like NNR because there aren't giant flaming holes in his reads like PX Rawr and dan.
this is just frustrating btw because you're literally saying "nnr is town because he's not as bad as these other guys" which...... has nothing to do with his alignment

what do you think of the fact that he hasn't even been doing anything with his "decent read" on me ever since i voted him?

Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #394 on: March 18, 2013, 06:54:53 AM »
octuple posting is town :)

the only reason i am posting in mafia right now by the way is because i was about to kill walhart in that hall chapter but then it turned out i forgot to move kellam out of his range and i lost a unit just before finishing the entire fucking chapter. that is not a thing i am happy about.

I have no name

  • Dodge ALL the bullets
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #395 on: March 18, 2013, 07:07:02 AM »
"there is probably at least one non-town in Raikaria/Shadoweh"
The phrasing was more to account for maf/SK interactions.

Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #396 on: March 18, 2013, 07:26:36 AM »
okay but

why do you think it's not just town/town?

I have no name

  • Dodge ALL the bullets
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #397 on: March 18, 2013, 07:33:58 AM »
Just a gut feeling I guess, as I said despite staring at the words for an hour I couldn't find any reasons why I suspected that.  Maybe I'll have better luck tomorrow morning after a good nights rest instead of an interrupted sleep.

NekoNekoRex

  • Catgirls are Charming!
  • *
  • Catgirl Enthusiast
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #398 on: March 18, 2013, 08:56:02 AM »
What case? The last two days you've been active lurking by questioning people and not doing much else, especially in regards to me. I'm hardly sidelining Shadoweh, I decided to read him and made a few comments on his post towards Raikaria.
Kilga is this right; like is this person seriously the player, and it's not some alias or something that's designed to be deliberately obfuscating? NekoNekoRex. Who the hell is that :C   ~Poya Aaaa (Serela), Bunny Must Die Mafia

NekoNekoRex

  • Catgirls are Charming!
  • *
  • Catgirl Enthusiast
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #399 on: March 18, 2013, 08:57:17 AM »
I still don't even know what  Shadoweh's case on Raikaria other then Raikaria voting Dan (which I don't have a problem with) and "go read Raikaria".
Kilga is this right; like is this person seriously the player, and it's not some alias or something that's designed to be deliberately obfuscating? NekoNekoRex. Who the hell is that :C   ~Poya Aaaa (Serela), Bunny Must Die Mafia

NekoNekoRex

  • Catgirls are Charming!
  • *
  • Catgirl Enthusiast
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #400 on: March 18, 2013, 09:28:54 AM »
His Raikaria and Dan votes were votes for the sake of voting so that people would get off his back. He attacked my rolespec as if he was talking to a town read only to turn around and say I'm null when pressed. Now he says I threw away all my reads to attack him, which, given that I still find rawr scummy and have found NNR scummy for most of the day, shows he is reading less of the thread than I am.
Is this the case? Fine, I'll address it.

Quote
He attacked my rolespec as if he was talking to a town read
I don't know where you got "as if talking to a town read". I told you to quit since it was ticking me off, one of the many things causing me frustration. I don't think I was implying you were town, that's a pretty dumb assumption to make.
It was a response to an accusation that wasn't even remotely true "that was a wall mostly directed at you". It's pretty clear I wasn't thinking hard.

Quote
only to turn around and say I'm null when pressed.
"When pressed". Okay, you got me there. I was frustrated, and suddenly under pressure, so I made a hasty read. Does that automatically make me scum? No. I can't imagine reacting any differently regardless of alignment, I was clearly not in the best Mafia-playing state of mind. Players of any alignment can slip up in that situation.

Quote
Now he says I threw away all my reads to attack him, which, given that I still find rawr scummy and have found NNR scummy for most of the day, shows he is reading less of the thread than I am.
Before:
Quote
I like both the NNR / rawr wagons but don't have anything more to add to them. Would actually take rawr over NNR since [Rawr] feels like he's putting in scummy non-effort.
After:
Quote
rawr I still think looks like he isn't actually trying to look for scum intent but his contribution are so sparse it's just kinda hard to get a feeling for it

EDIT:
No wait
Quote
he isn't actually
Quote
isn't
......oh.
......I guess I was wrong.

I still think you're scum though, you've been bending a lot of your reads to fit the best-fitting perspective since the game started. Going from "Dan is SK" to "I thought about it and he's actually scum" is fishy. And that's only one example of you doing that.
Kilga is this right; like is this person seriously the player, and it's not some alias or something that's designed to be deliberately obfuscating? NekoNekoRex. Who the hell is that :C   ~Poya Aaaa (Serela), Bunny Must Die Mafia

PX

  • School Idol?
  • *
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #401 on: March 18, 2013, 09:58:04 AM »
Honestly, I'm associating NNR and Raikaria as same alignment, and Raikaria is town so :/

Also, Rawr is probably the scums. Let's get him.

##Vote Rawr

Shadoweh

  • I will ahn~ vote count for you
  • *
  • The STRONGEST Day Effect
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #402 on: March 18, 2013, 10:28:14 AM »
huh what: I have to admit that NNR's responses to me make me want to vote him for dismissively trolling me. A NNR/Zak/Serela scumteam would be interesting but I don't think they could impersonate the qt that much :V Seriously though I'm not getting a scum vibe from Serela, weirdly. Maybe it's because he's being a good minion.


Kitten4u: "I'll say it plainly: THERE IS NO WAY SHADOWEH IS SCUM!" - A Balanced Game of Mafia

Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #403 on: March 18, 2013, 03:08:31 PM »
Wow that escalated fast reading...

Raikaria

  • Do Tank Girls Dream...
  • *
  • Of Floating Eyeballs?
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #404 on: March 18, 2013, 03:16:18 PM »
Somewhat annoyed that I'm being seen as scummier than someone resorting to blackmailing other players, [Seriously, ready #347, it basically amounts to 'I'll stop thinking badly of you if you help lynch this guy I don't like k?', and who's whole reason for voting me still boils down to 'I was voting ActionDan to try and make him do something'.

Rawr says he's reading atm, so I'll wait for his views. Otherwise I'm fine with voting Rawr for consolidation purposes, seeing as he's basically only prod-dodged.


http://www.malevole.com/mv/misc/tribute/
I don't even remember who put the above in my sig. [Wasn't me] Nor do I understand why I keep it here anymore.
Those two facts sum me up pretty well.

BT

  • I never talk to you
  • *
  • People say that I should
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #405 on: March 18, 2013, 03:36:01 PM »
I'm reading, but wow, yes Raikaria, you are taking this too seriously. What you refer to as blackmailing is something Shadoweh does all the time.

Can you order your vote preferences?

Raikaria

  • Do Tank Girls Dream...
  • *
  • Of Floating Eyeballs?
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #406 on: March 18, 2013, 03:58:54 PM »
Right now?

Shadoweh > ActionDan > Rawr > Everyone else > Zakeri/Ran/NNR

And I know little about everyone's playstyles. I don't know what Shadoweh usually does.


http://www.malevole.com/mv/misc/tribute/
I don't even remember who put the above in my sig. [Wasn't me] Nor do I understand why I keep it here anymore.
Those two facts sum me up pretty well.

Shadoweh

  • I will ahn~ vote count for you
  • *
  • The STRONGEST Day Effect
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #407 on: March 18, 2013, 04:06:34 PM »
But we've played quite a few games together by now. It's not like we're strangers, you should be familiar with my antics. And for everyone clearing you as town for going overboard, I would like to point out that at the time, there wasn't exactly a good sentiment of me around due to my sleepiness in posting. Raikaria could very well have thought I was viable. Now he's stuck with a case he's afraid to back down from.

I'll be back in about 6 hours. Serela is right about ~*~consolidation~*~ so let's get a move on. I heard NNR and Raikaria are good vacation spots.


Kitten4u: "I'll say it plainly: THERE IS NO WAY SHADOWEH IS SCUM!" - A Balanced Game of Mafia

BT

  • I never talk to you
  • *
  • People say that I should
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #408 on: March 18, 2013, 04:27:30 PM »
Serela earns a bucket of hate for ignoring my request for his reads and instead sticking his vote to the horrible poster. There's also how he seemed to have been fine with lynching the wagon he claims to be scum-motivated, the only one at that. Unexciting is totally a scum buzzword

Hell, he's self-aware in #320 that his reasons for not voting rawr can be applied to Dan but he leaves it at that. More in that post, he "thinks HW's reasoning is vaguely reaching" but doesn't reach any meaningful conclusion so the comment is basically there to discredit the dude and nothing else. In both of these examples he's only pointing things out without doing the other half of the job -- deciding what to do with that info. That's a scum-motivated move.

It continues. "Maybe it's just because I think Shadoweh looks legit while Raikaria doesn't, that makes me automatically see the post in a really bad light?" in #348. Serela does the whole self-discredit thing all the time but considering he just finished taking sides in a fight after noting a few times that he agrees with Shadoweh's reasons to suspect Raikaria, this doesn't feel natural. It feels more like he set up an excuse in advance because he knows where the vote is headed. To make the point clear, I could say right now that townreading Raikaria makes me read Serela's posts in a bad light, but that would be bullshit, because Serela is the reason I think Serela is bad. This is what Serela is doing here.

See, HW, this is why IHNN is scum. If he was town with bad reads I'd at least expect some hint that the reads are genuine. There's none of that, and all that's left is the fact he's stuck to the rawr vote all day instead of voting who he actually felt was off because they were big/growing wagons. Unexplained reads and illogical priorities, wrapped with a pretty ribbon. The fact that everyone feels like he's off/bad but I'm still the only vote on him is the coupe de grace.

HW brings a good point about Dan's slip -- no one noticed it but him so it's in fact possible that he has a different perspective, likely SK. Obviously not enough to vote him, only enough to point fingers and stare at him from a foot's range.

On the matter of IHNN; I don't really understand what is going on for the reasons, because I don't understand the whole HW plan that seems core to the reasoning for the votes and arguments.  So I fail to understand what is *so* bad about what he is saying. We're assuming people even followed any plan. I sure didn't.
Two questions:
1) What don't you understand about IHNN? How is HW's plan related?
2) ... You didn't follow the plan?

Also I've been thinking, and the Doc should consider going between Zak and the Fighter. Zak is kind of obvtown and the longer he's alive, the longer the scumteam is stuck talking about rocks. (WIFOM for scum is also fun.)
General note that this should happen. Granted, scum would probably still fret over the 10% chance, but I'm pretty sure my paranoia over Zak is gone (something I got over him calling so many people obvtown, I think? i was going to maybe comment on it but i'm pretty sure he's town now) and two targets over one is the way to go.

zak's px case is also alright
What PX case? I thought he mostly made the difference between PX and rawr because of his early scumtell.

I need to reread NNR and Shadoweh.

Current wagon status sucks. Are people willing to lynch IHNN? I obviously support lynching Serela with others though I don't want to scramble on consolidation too much. rawr is a backup consolidation option that I really don't want us to use.

Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #409 on: March 18, 2013, 06:29:52 PM »
Quote from:  raikaria
All he could possibly accomplish is wasting town's time. Which is anti-town. Combined with the rest of of his behavior, and a lynch is long justified. Give me one thing Dan has said or done that has the slightest whiff of being town.
Well we could look at it this way, Dan sees that people are making obvious scumslips to him such as huhwhat and serela. Wouldnt it be logical to try to and push for there lynch straight off? It may not be the usual scum hunting way but if scum fucks up wouldnt it be logical to punish them for it? Dan probably could have done it in a more graceful way but I probably would think of this as town motive.

Quote from:  zakeri
I'll happily sheep Rawr
yes sheep me that would make me happy like a newly wed

I think both raikaria and shadoweh are somewhat town atm but if I had to make the choice between one of them it would probably be Raikaria. With the reaction to the blackmail which shadoweh could never follow up with I dont consider this to be anything at all. Also this post bother me entirely:
Quote from:  raikaria
I'm not getting off Dan unless something else happens.
Which bothers me alot because this could be seen as a way to keep his vote on actiondan which is a potential consolidation lynch. Im also seeing that the moment the dan wagon fell apart he used his earlier excuse as a way to jump off of it.

Ok so maybe raikaria could be scum though i could just be making stuff up i guess idk

id still like to lynch serela

Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #410 on: March 18, 2013, 06:30:07 PM »
still reading also

Raikaria

  • Do Tank Girls Dream...
  • *
  • Of Floating Eyeballs?
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #411 on: March 18, 2013, 07:13:25 PM »
With the amount of people saying 'Shadoweh is town' I can see a Shadoweh lynch isn't happening.

Still waiting for Rawr to finish his reading before I make up my mind on who to vote, but for now I know Shadoweh isn't getting lynched so I'll stop sitting there:

##Unvote

Although I do disagree with this:

Well we could look at it this way, Dan sees that people are making obvious scumslips to him such as huhwhat and serela. Wouldnt it be logical to try to and push for there lynch straight off? It may not be the usual scum hunting way but if scum fucks up wouldnt it be logical to punish them for it? Dan probably could have done it in a more graceful way but I probably would think of this as town motive.

If he was pushing for their lynch he'd have to convince other people.

To do that he'd have to explain why he wants them lynched.

To do that he should explain what the scumread is.

It's not scumhunting, it's just wasting time, and/or attempting to just form random wagons for no reason.


http://www.malevole.com/mv/misc/tribute/
I don't even remember who put the above in my sig. [Wasn't me] Nor do I understand why I keep it here anymore.
Those two facts sum me up pretty well.

Conqueror

  • Here I am, dirty and faceless
  • waiting to heed your instruction
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #412 on: March 18, 2013, 07:57:54 PM »
Day 1, DEFCON 3
Votecount Brother Sam
I have no name:    BT (1)
Serela:    rawr (1)
NekoNekoRex:    Dormio, huhwhat (2)
Raikaria:    Shadoweh, Serela, IHNN (3)
huhwhat:    ActionDan, NekoNekoRex (2)
rawr:    PX (1)
PX:    Zakeri (1)

Not voting: Raikaria

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
You have 9.5 hours left.

No majority = No lynch
« Last Edit: March 18, 2013, 08:02:03 PM by Conqueror »


On tue un homme, on est un assassin. On tue des millions d'hommes, on est un conqu?rant. On les tue tous, on est un dieu.
Every saint has a past and every sinner a future.

Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #413 on: March 18, 2013, 08:20:11 PM »
good morning

##Unvote
##Vote: Serela

Shadoweh

  • I will ahn~ vote count for you
  • *
  • The STRONGEST Day Effect
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #414 on: March 18, 2013, 08:53:26 PM »
I'm back early, still ready for choo choo Raikaria. I supose I wouldn't be against lynching Serela because it would stop people from not lynching Raikaria just because Serela is on him with me..


Kitten4u: "I'll say it plainly: THERE IS NO WAY SHADOWEH IS SCUM!" - A Balanced Game of Mafia

BT

  • I never talk to you
  • *
  • People say that I should
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #415 on: March 18, 2013, 09:07:16 PM »
##Unvote, ##Vote Serela

Raikaria, answer my questions, pretty please?

Dormio Ergo Sum

  • MotK's Official Idlebot
  • *
  • I don't bite... much.
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #416 on: March 18, 2013, 09:19:18 PM »
I think I was supposed to post in this topic yesterday.
But then I fell asleep.
Whatever.

##Unvote
##Vote Raikaria

Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #417 on: March 18, 2013, 09:23:52 PM »
If I was scum, I'd reluctantly wagon Raikari, and then use the resulting flip to tear into Shadoweh with a huge case tomorrow.

##Unvote: PX
##Vote: Serela

my town read was based solely on role shenans anyways.

Raikaria

  • Do Tank Girls Dream...
  • *
  • Of Floating Eyeballs?
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #418 on: March 18, 2013, 09:30:47 PM »

Two questions:
1) What don't you understand about IHNN? How is HW's plan related?
2) ... You didn't follow the plan?

I didn't understand the core of IHNN's argument, because I wasn't under the impression that we were actually following the 'plan' HW posted at DC5.

I wasn't under the impression that there was an agreed upon plan. Besides, picking according to a convention scum would know is stupid. HW's idea could be a red herring.


http://www.malevole.com/mv/misc/tribute/
I don't even remember who put the above in my sig. [Wasn't me] Nor do I understand why I keep it here anymore.
Those two facts sum me up pretty well.

Raikaria

  • Do Tank Girls Dream...
  • *
  • Of Floating Eyeballs?
Re: DEFCON Mafia (Day 1, DEFCON 3)
« Reply #419 on: March 18, 2013, 09:32:20 PM »
Oh yeah can people explain the Serela vote reasons? Because all the Serela discussion is scattered everywhere, between different people at different points, amking it somewhat difficult to form the 'complete' case against Serela. What in particular makes Serela so bad?


http://www.malevole.com/mv/misc/tribute/
I don't even remember who put the above in my sig. [Wasn't me] Nor do I understand why I keep it here anymore.
Those two facts sum me up pretty well.