BT:I love you. Thank you for explaining PX is town in a way that is more likely to convince people then my explanation that basically is only good enough to justify why I have the opinion myself.
NNR's essay on Rawr is kind of funny because Rawr is the one person that pretty much everyone can agree is terrible, it doesn't need any touch-up because he hadn't posted since mid-d1 with questionable content, and the main reason he isn't a wagon is due to PX having assumably role-related reasons he isn't. (That's supposed to be relevant by implying we'd be lynching rawr otherwise) It's like, the easiest scumread content you can make while simultaneously also being useless because everyone knows already.
Sas-amra's post is coolbeans.
Conq's question:Given that he's gone I'm not sure there's as much merit in answering it, especially now that I'm about to say... does my d2 start post cover answering this? >_> <_<
Seeing rawr existing is cool but he hasn't done anything but make responses to things directly asked of him (None of which resulted in any actual notable content like scumhunting). Posting a list of his reads with no explanation is not helpful, especially when the scum list is "people voting PX". Still scummy as eff
Dormio is also still barely giving any reasoning for his votes. He uses vague terms like "doesn't contribute much" to easily throw his vote around without actually having to lay down anything for people to scrutinize. Unlike Rawr he doesn't have a reason that people are wary of lynching him, either, so if a wagon sprouted up on him I'd be happy to end the day with Dormio-lynchings.
Well, no, NNR is better for the lynch just because he's going to be a huuge distraction to everyone at this point until he's lynched (And also that he's scummy, of course, but)
PX end of day behavior is clearly scummy, he said ?At this point, it's a coinflip. I think NNR is still scummier than Zak, but at this point I'd rather lynch Zak because I can get a better read on NNR D2 based on D1.? I mean, even if it was a close call, why would anyone who thinks one is more likely to flip scum vote the other? He want even one step further and defended Zakeris fake (soft)claim here and here . I have to say that it's hardly a accurate comparison because Zakeris line was certainly mean to give a claim impression.
This paragraph oh god why. I mean, I can see why it's kind of off, but I don't really agree that it's scummy weird. Like, what's scummy about the claim-related shenanigans? It's weird, but, that's all. The reasoning on the actual vote part makes sense. Aaaand... what about the rest of PX's content? You've only mentioned his end-of-day stuff unless I missed something. Kind of weird considering you're voting him. I also still want to see what you think of the people in general so I can see what you think about the guys you aren't voting.
