Dan's restriction holds for now so nothing on that but I was thinking on Dormio's SB vote. At first I thought SB's was a good question but thinking about Dormio voting him for it and later saying why I'm now wondering what the point in asking was. Why would the mod possibly have it be in effect in *YLO when that would be auto-win for scum? Seems like a redundant question to make a contribution.
The last game here with a hated townie didn't turn off in *YLO. I wanted to make sure we weren't facing it a day early.
Also ##FoS on SB for having no scumreads and not doing anything else productive. At least comment on the current votes in place or something, or comment on any of the weird quirks.
I'm not going to make up scumreads just to make myself look productive. It took me a reread to actually get anything productive out of the thread, so I really don't think Zak is as bad as people are making him out to be because of this.
Oarfish, why is Dan's PR more likely to be fabricated than true? I'm reading it as null atm, especially since I've seen townies fake PRs for no reason before. It'd be good if you voiced some other suspicions too, because you're kind of blocking out everything that isn't Dan right now.
##Unvote
##Vote: Serela
Serela's post at the top of page 4 bugs me. If you think Raikaria's actions can be dismissed just because he's Raikaria, why bring them up in the first place? It's not like he's a huge wagon people need to talk about, so this just reads as really odd to me. I also dislike how he accuses Dorian of twisting his meta in order to case him, especially since all Dorian on that point was that it was beyond the amount you normally waffle?
If Massaca is gonna say stuff like "miller claim means Dorian is shady as hell" he needs to like, actually examine his posts rather than just make an assumption. I also feel as if his Dan case is way too reliant on what he COULD do in future instead of the scummy he things he's done so far.
Kind of uncomfortable with how easily Schezo backs off of Serela. Yes, he has content right now, but is it
good content? Because it doesn't look like you've really examined it before dismissing your vote on him.
I dislike how Bard votes the wrong person but then decides "oh well he's scummy anyway" rather than fixing it. It feels like he's missing his usual conviction.
I haven't actually read the last 10 posts or so properly yet, but I'm kind of tired of rereading+writing.