I'm back and unlike last game *STUFF HAPPENED* while I slept!
@ ActionDan wagon
So; wait, now people decide it's weird? After I already pointed this out a while ago?
Still, I'm in the same camp as Dr.Rawr. Scum wouldn't come out and say 'hey guys my role is anti-town!'. Some perfectly fine town roles can be seen as anti-town in some situations. Like a roleblocker; especially in role madness early in the game [You're more likely to hit town], or a Vigilante [Again; good chance of shooting the fellow townies which is an anti-town result]
And why are people claiming their role names? Since from what myself, O4rfish and Chaore said about the role mechanics and role names being aligned, it is possible that giving out our role names/characters is giving the mafia more information that is required of us.
===
The whole Massaca thing with Schezo is both hilarious and confusing at the same time. I'm not even sure if it is worth me listening to that discussion is the confusion of player names there makes it difficult to decipher.
However, I must admit bailing an RVS wagon at 4 out of fear of a hammer when the requirement to lynch is 9 is a very strange thing to do. However, I also feel that it is non-indicative.
===
2nd Massaca part; the more recent stuff:
And if he is town then he appears to be painting a night kill target on his back which isn't too exactly a useful thing to be doing at this stage either >_>
Anyway, I quite like that second paragraph on so yeah.
##Vote: ActionDan
Painting a nightkill target on your back can be a perfectly acceptable thing to do if your role is actually unimportant; or even detrimental for the scum to kill, such as a Bomb.
@ BT: I take it the behavioural gap is the two quotes you have in
#142===
Serela I missed you and your waffleing. It appears your waffle has become even more glorious to listen to since you took a break.
You don't deserve my vote anymore:
#Unvote===
I don't really like Dorian pushing Serela for claiming he turned around in his vote on Zakeri when the reason he voted Zakeri was completely different to the reason he 'almost-voted' me. I was over-reacting to the 'case' itself [When in actuality I was just doing my normal 'press for info thing]. Serela voted Zakeri for
jokevoting in the first place.Also claiming Serela is wagonhopping when most of the Zak votes have been there for a long time [SB and Chaore's votes were from RVS], and Dormio's was basically for the same reason as why Serela voted him. I would hardly accuse Serela of just jumping onto the best looking wagon. Especially not when Serela has only voted twice so far, one being RVS. If a more sustained pattern develops then that accusation may be valid. Otherwise...
But you vote Zakeri for doing nothing, cause we all know what a whirlwind of activity he usually is day one, ? oh wait, he isn't.
So why is it better to ?vote Zakeri for being Zakeri? than to vote Raikaria for the same reason?
Why is it so scummy if someone comes in late with a joke vote when we have player like Dan and SB who are still siting on their joke votes?
Wait, so you accuse Serela of voting Zakeri for being Zakeri [Because he is 'doing nothing'] and then you acknowledge his jokevote, and try to correlate it to RVS votes? I was still sitting on my RVS vote until now too. The difference is Zakeri
made this 'jokevote' after RVS had ended. It's not good that you say within sentences of each other than Serela is voting Zakeri for 'doing nothing' and then talk about the 'jokevote' which is not 'doing nothing'.
I really don't like the way you are pushing Serela. I think pretty much every main point you have thrown at Serela is pretty weak. The fact this is literally your only content as well makes me have the worst opinion of you out of everyone right now.
#Vote: DorianOn that matter I don't like the fact Zakeri said:
Don't worry SB, the best reads so far are the ones on Serela and the other guy for bandwagon hoping.
How can one be wagon 'hopping' when one has only placed a single vote? Accusing Serela of jumping on the wagon, which was nowhere near the edge and was clearly a jokevote in RVS is one thing, but accusing someone of hopping around wagons is quite another.
Also worth mentioning that Dorian is voting Serela for voting Zakeri, and both Dorian and Zakeri seem to be using the really bad wagon hopping case against Serela. [Zakeri's use being even worse but he's not actually voting on it.]. Not saying they're scumbuddies but it's still an interesting sign.
===
Other people other than Dorian I don't read well include Zakeri [That should be pretty obvious from my Dorian vote], SB [What happened when we didn't lynch the lurkers last game?] and Massaca is kinda on the borderline so I need to think about this one and re-read the events last night. The fact the people pushing him have not actually made a fully explained case dosen't help.
I also have a few townreads. Not sharing those.