D1 is not a good day to burn out on Mafia, since it's the most crapshoot-y of all days due to the lack of flips, K4U. But oh well. I did not mean any harm to you in my above post.
capt.h is becoming stupidly exasperating. Calls Dan for lurking and being not so derptown without commenting on his case on Shadoweh, calls Dormio derptown for voting LLD when he actually agreed with his points on her, accuss Omba (sorry) for having lots of null reads without commenting on her case on Edible, Even his points on Schezo doesn't exactly ring true... In the end, capt.h has a fair number of arbitrary and unsubstantiated reads that I cannot condone; he's not so clear about what he thinks is derptown and what is not, and why Schezo all of a sudden rockets up to second scummiest target for him. Also, I see no currency to his cases seeing that he never really read up on the above people's latest posts.
@capt.h: If possible, capt.h, I would like you to answer the above statements to the best of your ability; otherwise, you are my second scum choice for today.
I had a lot of trouble following Dan's case on Shadoweh, which kept me from commenting on it. I think it's based on Shadoweh claiming that each lynch gives scum a night kill after Omba suggested it, which I don't find scummy on its own, nor do I find it scummy that an early D1 vote not be well backed. I think Dan also went after Shadoweh for trying to keep Dormio from being lynched for stepping in LLD's traps while Shadoweh hinted at but didn't mention any of the other reasons Dormio was scummy. It's a thought-out case, but I didn't think it was a great case.
Actually, Dan, could you clarify your case on Shaodweh?
On Dormio, bluntly, I'm derp town, and if I hadn't given it a lot of time before responding, I would have done the same thing as Dormio. LLD was my first miller claim, and after the long post game discussion we had about how claimed third parties should be lynched on sight, I was thinking the same thing as Dormio about claimed millers.
But LLD needs to get back here; I haven't seen her since her apology, and I'm finding it suspicious that she still hasn't give any reads on anyone other than Dormio after her miller claim. She hasn't done any scum hunting other than attacking people who attack her for her claim, and even if miller claims are null, her game can be summarized as laying a trap, apologizing for her play, and then lurking through the rest of the day.
I hadn't read Omba's Edible vote at the time I posted; I didn't realize there was one last post at the bottom of the page before we got to page 6. Omba's case on Edible is strange, and Edible's case itself doesn't look particularly town to me. Edible needs to explain why a scum slip is scum while falling into a trap is town, or expand on his reasons for voting Action Dan. And I'd like to know how Omba reached her conclusion about Action Dan; Action Dan was Omba's first vote after all, but now Omba says he's derp town while another player was voting Dan for a scum slip. It's a strong reversal of her previous reads.
He became suspicious when he started posting. I disagree with him that Omba gave a solid opinion, since both Schezo and I agreed in our posts that most of Omba's opinions were null, and Schezo originally voted Omba for his vote on Dan.
@K4U -
I have to admit, I am not clear on your suspicions of Schezo, mostly because they were always a bit to the side while you focused on me. You also seem to have a strong read on Omba. Could you clarify?