post four three is our first interaction and he votes for me. he then asks if i am fishing for roles by asking people to think about the setup. i hope i do not have to explain why starting by voting for me gave me a bad first impression.
I actually want you to because that means to me that you could be holding onto me being one of the few who got onto you and it could be clouding your judgment.
post one zero four is thoughts on the players. waffles on what he thinks about tasty man and rabbit face. he said that he let me go with something he said earlier. since there is no post between four three and one zero four i have no idea what this means. anyways he tries to use the argument red doll boy used in post nine zero that i am trying too hard to read people and bad for being patient. also he tries to use the argument night lurker had about the joke vote wagon against me. he then has this weird paragraph filled with waffles about how i am almost not suspicious but red doll boy is bad for suspecting me and maybe the adorable artificer of automatons is actively lurking which is bad but red doll boy could be setting him up but he really is not contributing. opinion of koumajou densetsu fox is blatantly a parrot of night lurker and takeover king complete with links to posts. seriously this post is a well constructed combination of waffling and the opinions of other players.
When you accuse me of twisting your information, don't do the same to me. At that point, the only thing that happened to Pesco/Edible was their initial argument at the very beginning. I had no idea what to think of them at that point and it's instantly a waffle when either could have been lying at that point. Please define what you think waffle is. The attempt to convict you that you say was a legitimate concern because we hadn't heard from multiple people at that point and you kept egging on a vig/drastic measures. I admit, I could have worded that post better but you're taking stuff out of context. You want to call me out on blatant parroting, when I left quotes of the people who brought up the points not claiming them as my own but as good thinking points, yet you take Kitten's
160 and call me out for exactly what you're doing right now except without the link to the author. And what, your last point, you don't want me to give opinions on other people? How does that make sense?
post one eight one is where he votes for the waffle buster. i was counting votes and people who were present at the deadline and his vote sealed the lynch. says he believes tasty man over rabbit face. i question him about this later so i will wait to say more about this waffle. he says i drop alot and he can kinda see some town in my posts. if you waffle any harder you will levitate. his next point is that the cute crafter of cutouts is making him frustrated and he needs to die today if not tomorrow. considering his vote and that there are not enough people online to change the lynch to the cute crafter of cutouts this reads like crown boy is trying to set up a lynch for tomorrow. makes an unconvincing argument for why he is voting waffle buster and votes.
No shit I was setting Doll up for a lunch because at that point I knew I was using my power and he would be part of my duo lynch.
You're telling me my argument of PX wasn't convincing because I had some reasons to convict him and thought they rang true with what everyone else brought up about his alignment. Looking back now, I see some emotion clouded my judgment, but I still saw him a better vote over Hourai at that point because Hourai wasn't being as bad as PX.
post one eight nine is an answer to me asking why he is not voting for rabbit face if he thinks tasty man is correct. answer is that he was only leaning and did not have a solid opinion because of something night lurker said and he is not for sure that he wants rabbit face to die. this entire post screams the words i do not want to pick a side.
This is silly. Once again you're trying to take a point out on me for not instantly believing Edible like you did and I look bad for it? There was not near enough information at that time for me to choose one or the other and you want to hold it against me for not playing like you do.
also restates that town needs to hammer before fourty eight hours pass which was my argument in the first place so i have no idea why he would listen to me if he really thought i was on the red colored team.
Just because one is scum doesn't mean they can put out some valid points. I don't like this.
post two eight five is about claiming the role of riot leader. the reasoning for using the power given by your role is a good reason. the reasoning for how there is no possibility that crown boy is not on the red colored team with this role is not true. the possibility that the red colored team believes they can skip a day by activating this role exists. roles also tend to be assigned randomly so the idea that because a role sounds inherently like a town role makes that person town does not hold up to examination. crown boy decides to back away from me because i am new but after rereading his posts i still believe that oh my god he sucks.
I don't see the post restriction that someone put on you being a pro town role if you know what I mean. While roles can be assigned randomly , things like roleblocker tend to be more scum affiliated. I'll give you that it doesn't hold up, but I don't see scum wanting to end the game sooner by giving town more votes. Having town maybe waste a day on Doll seems like a much better way to go about it because then they would get two nightkills for two lynches instead of 2 nightkills for 3 lynches.
crown boy does your opinion of the fox change knowing that he is also a new player? he said so when he signed up for this game.
Don't ask me loaded questions. There is a clear difference between me giving you a slight clear for being new and trying some features out and generally playing bad. This is my third game on this board and so far I was scum twice so there's no reason for me to not put Dormio under the ringer like everyone else just because he is new, especially when he's been playing bad.
post one zero four managed to be large and comment on many people and say absolutely nothing original
Is a bold faced lie. There are unique opinions on what I think in there.
he went out of his way to set up the cute crafter of cutouts as a lynch today just before day one ended.
I already answered this but again, I knew I was using my power today and getting rid of a lurker earlier on, (which still hasn't posted anything) is helpful to town I thought so I don't see the problem with me setting it up early.
there are so many things wrong with all his posts combined that i cannot continue to think that i am just reacting to being attacked.
And what the hell Shadoweh? Part of your attack on me is because I didn't immediately choose between Edible and Pesco yet you want to do the same thing and not expect me to call you out on it? Really? Can you see where I was coming from earlier now, or are you still going to hold it against me?
And I backed up off you because others pointed a point out that I completely understood, yet you want to hold that against me still. Would you rather I didn't hold any sympathy for how a new person played and just bash you?
--
Dormio: I chose PX over Hourai because I got a bit emotional. He was more blatant about doing bad play and Hourai slipped under my senses. Also his not answering the question Bard asked him correctly didn't help him in any way. You yourself still haven't done anything though, so that's not good.
Iced Fairy: At who I think is active scum? At this point, I'm seeing Pesco and Bard. Pesco's reasoning on how Kitten's death could be because she was warmer on the scum is bullshit. If he or anyone else is scum, there's no reason why they just didn't kill her out of experience and in Pesco's case to give himself a talking point on people because the nightkill most closely relates to certain people when it can easily be set up for just that reason. That's a very weak reason to put on me and I don't like how you take it and run with it. Leading us with one way logic, "If Kitten died this early, there is justification behind it." isn't good either because let's not throw it out there that scum could have random killed to just stir up drama, which Pesco seems to be following like planned or is one of the scum who set it up to do this.
Bard, his PX case made sense, but the squabble with Zakeri is bad. He contorted Zakeri's information to try and make him look like the bad guy. This:
Nightphase conjecture is based on a flawed assumption, and the idea that my words were aimed at town during nightphase. I see no further reason to need to justify what I did during the night because it is nothing more than meaningless conjecture based on flawed assumptions.
is dodging the comment on how he did nothing town proactive with his night power when he easily could and should have.
:V Are you seriously going to argue "I'm town so I have no reason to kill people"? Although the role is beneficial to town, this is bastard moddery, and scum wielding a pro-town weapon is not at all outside the realm of possibilities.
I haven't seen bastard mod yet, I've seen rolemadness but I guess I take it that it's possible.
My point is that you have to interpret that yourself for the most part. He posts a wall of reports on what happened, and then uses three to four words to make a throw away comment that "x is suspicious". It's like throwing a bunch of paper on the table, saying, "The evidence speaks for itself! I am right!" without explaining HOW this evidence supports your claim, or why you are right. Zakeri has dug up my D1 actions, but he failed to explain why these are suspicious.
I guess because I got all the evidence that he brought up when I first read it without thinking about why is why I feel bad about you. It did in fact speak for itself when I read it and I'm pretty sure it does for others as well.
Zakeri's 313 helps support my opinion on Bard too, I agree with almost all or it. The only part is where Bard's PX wasn't completely justified and I felt it was after mid day because that's when I arrived and read it all at once but the point where the PX vote wasn't kosher on the beginning makes some sense, because I hadn't thought about it.
I think that's enough for now and I'll clarify if some of this is in-comprehensive.
