Okay let's try sum some thoughts up.
The one thing that absolutely puzzles me is the amounts of derps Rouk has delivered through out the game:
Pathetic attempt of an attack on Bob at the end of Day One +
WIFOM clear on Schezo and Affinity and repeat emphasis on the WIFOM reasoning as if it's solid fact. Bard has pointed them out to him but Rouk seems to remain oblivious to it all. Is he usually this derp? He certainly doesn't give off that impression the previous game I've played him (where he was a disinterested scum), so I'm just curious, can anyone tell me if he derps like this in previous games he play?
Another thing that bothers me slightly (also something I count towards his derpiness) was how he tried to buddy-up to VgT on Day Two, TWICE, when airing opinions about the players. I can understand showing general agreement to another player, but... "I like VgT, keeps his stuff short and sweet, and I agree with a lot of it. I like this guy."? And then "VgT - Honestly? I like VgT. He's consise, and I agree with just about everything he says."? Why would you possibly want to do that? If anything, it draws negative attention, and wasn't it YOU who said "
Except that Town would RATHER PAY ATTENTION TO SCUM THAN HAVE TIME WASTED ON THEMSELVES?" when Bob said that not all negative attentions are bad?
TBH, my vote on Rouk is mainly due to the derps, but now that I think about it, it hardly translates to scumminess except for the fact that I feel that his display of stupidity is a little forced and staged, for what purpose? I can't really decide. Soooo... yeah, if someone can shed some light on his usual playstyle, it'd be appreciated.
NOW, onto other things.
I believe we should rely more on Day One's voting distribution to determine who the scums are rather than Day Two, since the Day Two votes carry a lot of busing potentials, and I'm sure everyone can agree that at least one person on Bob's wagon is a scum (Roukanken vs huhwhat vs VgameT vs Affinity).
VgT... the Rouk without the derp, everything he's done has been pretty logical TBH, aggressive, constant pressure on his targets, logical. Only fault I see with him is that he's too single-minded with his targets and too content with ignoring everyone else, but I'm happy to write that off simply as his playstyle. It may not be all that smart to write off Schezo as a derp the way he did, but at least he never tried to excuse it with some ridiculous reasons. Still on the suspect list but I just don't see anything that can truly incriminate him more than anyone else.
Nothing really noteworthy about huhwhat, he's played the counter-Rouk the entire Day Two, issue with him is that he never seemed to be all too convinced about Schezo, he repeated a couple times that the possibility of Schezo being town is there, yet still expressed his willingness to vote for him, reasoning it to benefit the town more than Hourai-lynch and only end up jumping on the wagon towards the end of the Day... He has certainly left himself with room to go for Hourai (stating how Hourai was gradually looking worse despite how he cleared Hourai with a WIFOM earlier), soooo.... I dunno, I definitely see the possibility of him being the scum and going for the safer solution at the end of Day Two, but... I dunno.
Affinity: End of Day One wagon jump, enough said? Of course not. The guy has been reasonably neutral through out the game, everything he says seem perfectly logical, good analysis, good questions raised, everything seem perfectly pro-town, but he's just been so unaggressive (yeah yeah no such word), his comments of both Hourai and Schezo in Day Two always seem to involve a slap then a pat on the back. I'm just getting a really bad vibe about it all, maybe it's just because he's playing similarly to his previous game where he was a scum, his logical posts and his busing of his scumbuddy had him sail comfortably into victory.
And, with the others...
DollS once again chose not to place any vote in Day Two, as suspect as he is now, I'm happy to ignore his lack of participation, reason? He's far less of a threat to the town than the other potential scum (assuming there is another), and judging from the logical night kills, I'd like to think there's an experienced player in the scum team that's making these decision. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying DollS is too stupid to be making these night kills, it's just that personal, I expect him to be night killing based on some other criteria judging from his playstyle.
PX is meh, nothing much to be said about him, everything he did makes good enough sense but none of his actions really clear him as town though. Except for him being the second the jump on Schezo's wagon on Day One, but that could just be him not expecting the wagon to really build up enough to threaten that of Bob's.
I still need to reread on Bard, though I feel good about the way he has played in general, well, a little better than the rest at least.
So to conclude:
Everyone looks like fucking scums. Though I'm starting to feel worse about Affinity than Rouk.
Let's see what people has to say about my analysis, what have I missed, what am I wrong about, etc.