Yeah, I handled the claim situation yesterday super poorly. I'm not sure what I could have done to change it, though.
Eugh. Zak - capitalizing on NNR taking a break after he submitted to "your fault" deserves scrutiny but I don't think it's something I haven't seen before. Considering this is your only point, what about the rest of Pesco's play? Why is Edible less scummy for tagging along and why is he "definitely" not scum if Pesco is? Why did you focus on the NNR wagon and not the IHNN wagon (at all) when the same people ended up on it / for it anyway? Do you think it was town-motivated or not?
The rest of Pesco's play is just pushing for my lynch, which I commented on as much as I could yesterday. They way he gets a read on me is weird, but it's Pesco Flavor-weird, so it's a nulltell.
As for the logic, it's just a gut feeling from how Edible was more passive than pesco but more active than IHNN (Who yesterday I also thought was scum for the same reason). It's also the fact that I seriously doubt the scum would try to doubleteam somebody in such a way.
The reason I feel like most of the scumteam are lurking is because everyone that was Nameless's wagon were town. They were either on my wagon or flaffing about at the end of the day.
Dormio's case on me looks blah. It's just all "I think this feels fake." Which is a bad point in general because even as scum I try to put more emphasis on going with my genuine reads since those are easier to explain.
I was against Schezo yesterday because he looked like he was trying to take a lynch out on somebody who wasn't scum for reasons that are too easy to push on newbies. I know Raikaria isn't exactly a newbie, but that case wasn't one that was looking for scum.
1: Raitaki says he will hammer IHNN if need be. Polaris then shows up and votes IHNN for no apparent reason. Could be scum hopping on a townie lynch which a 'If I have to hammer...' was expressed. Of course, could be 'Last 10 mins' thing too, but worth pointing out.
Looking at the last ten minutes of a wagon is pointless, since everyone is given equal reason to press the lynch onto a townie at that close to deadline- even people that were speaking up for their towniness beforehand.
Also, why did you back off of Dormio? I don't see the case on Edible (although I do get where you're coming from with it) but all dormio did was just substitute reasoning in later. It's a common thing for scum to give vague reads so they only have to explain them to appease people who catch that they're being vague.
I'll be willing to switch to Dormio lynch later in the day.
If I hadn't been cut 17 times before the hammer told me to shutup I would have said not claiming until the next day is okay. It's the next day, and your starter kind of pretends that whole thing never happened,
I kind of want to pretend it didn't happen, to be honest.
Not liking how people are dodging the curvy laser that is Zak's scummyness.
I had four votes on me at the time this was posted (More than anybody else) And the reason I was being 'ignored' was because people were pressing their other scumreads.
Do you have a problem with people doing that?
Well, L-1, and I'm not going to be able to talk about Schezo at all today without claiming so here goes:
Once a night I can use my intuition to confirm a person's alignment. I can investigate anyone that isn't Dormio, Polaris, or Serela.
Last night I investigated Schezo, and he came back town.
The thing is without that confirmation, I'd probably be tearing into his vote on IHNN, especially considering half of his reason for the switch involved using scumflips that he didn't have in order to justify jumping off of my wagon.
