I said I found Zakeri weird, and that I would reread him because of this when I had time. Well then, heaven or hell, let's rock.
First off, we have his fake L-1 vote on Shadoweh. This by itself was rather interesting, however, without any follow up given it kind of looks to me like a lazy way to earn townie cred for breaking us out of the RVS.
I assume that Zakeri's #71 is in response to Shadoweh's #49, where she calls Schezo town. Zakeri claims that Shadoweh is buddying up to Schezo, as he is trying to save her from being lynched.
I honestly find it hard to believe that anyone would be quicklynched in the RVS, and I doubt that Zakeri believes that such a thing could happen either. Which raises the question of why Zakeri would continue to hold onto this point. He admits himself that it is a stretch to think that Shadoweh believed that she was at actual risk of being lynched in #129.

Outside of this, his case on Shadoweh is... What is his case on Shadoweh? I don't get it, it sounds as though he's thinking that Shadoweh is scum for getting a read on Schezo. Zakeri fails to address anything else.
His clear of me, Schezo, and Serela is really sketchy. I mean, Schezo is town because Shadoweh called him town and Shadoweh is scum. Serela and I are town because we called each other scum at the beginning of the game.

He calls my argument with Schezo as being town vs. town, and that only noise will come out of it if we were left alone. If he believed this to be the case, why did he not do anything about it?
In addition, Zakeri says that my unvote of Shadoweh in response to the fake L-1 doesn't seem 100% town to him. Fair enough, however, this probably means that Zakeri believes that I did not believe that Shadoweh was likely to get lynched. Why can I think that Shadoweh won't be lynched, but not Shadoweh?
As in, if he can think that I did not believe that Shadoweh would be lynched, what happens to his case on Shadoweh which required her to believe that she was at risk of actually being lynched?
I mean, Zakeri's actions feel really off to me.
Now for my own sake, I'm going to reiterate my thoughts on PX.
I dislike how PX did not follow up on the questions he asked in #41.
I dislike the hypocriticism in PX's #89, where he created his own list with several null reads whilst saying that JOB doing this was scummy due to it being a lazy way of feigning scumhunting.
I feel that PX is going after an easy lynch in JOB, rather than looking for actual scum. After all, his entire case revolves around JOB using faulty logic.
I do not like how PX has been using rage at JOB as an excuse to ignore the rest of the game. I still have questions that I would like answered from him. Namely, why did he consider ActionDan to be townie in his list of reads when Conq and Zakeri had actually posted more than Dan, why did he believe Shadoweh to be scummy, and who he thinks is scummy outside of JOB.
Despite the fact that I asked him these questions on a few occasions, he never answered any of them, preferring to rage at JOB instead. He also ignores everything else that is happening in the game, with the whole rage at JOB business.
Yep, I would prefer to see PX lynched today, but would not be averse to switching to Zakeri if that is what is needed to secure a lynch.