Alright,
Show me. What parts don't sound town motivated. I want to see it, please quote it.
You realize I've been pointing that out for a while now, right? Right? W/e, here you go
You fail to take into account ~*~MotK Town~*~
1 - The post that initally got you under fire. The not town motivated part is the "hello, I'm fluff" one.
2 - Most of
this post, as I already stated
here.
Actually let me try to clear up my thought process in this when I made that post.
I mulled over a few options and chose the lesser of the evils, (so I thought)
I could lurk
I could parrot your serious request
I could treat it as if nothing serious had happened at that point
And since there was no feedback at that point, no there wasn't anything serious going on to me, so I chose the third.
3 - This. What you say here is that you opted to post just so you could post (you deemed posting fluff the lesser evil compared to posting nothing).
I wouldn't damn you for 3 alone, which is why I didn't vote you at that point. Combined with the post linked in 2, however...
I thought this 1 on 1 we had could be townxtown but there is seriously something wrong with how you're taking what I tell you. It's almost like you've made up your mind on what you think of me before I answer. I honestly think you're scum leading up an elaborate vote on me so you don't look like you're bandwagoning and there's two posts you just made that make me feel this way.
I'm not going into this with the assumption you're scum. I'm just bashing anything bashworthy you say until you either stop saying bashworthy things or die. It's that easy.
In the post you vote me in, 114 these lines don't flow with what you've been saying and just seem to me to be a buff to your case on me that you can just tack on.It doesn't fit and makes me wary with how you've been talking to me.
Durrr... :V
What do you get when after picking something apart, there's nothing left? Right, a lack of something. These lines are not tacked on, they're the conclusion I've reached from the posts you made and the answers you gave me.
Then you go ahead with the post you just made and do the same things you just called me out on. Are you kidding me? Fuck. It's even about the same person. You seriously are encouraging people to beat stuff over the head with a stick, knock it down and stomp on it aren't you?
... Seriously? You're not seeing the difference between a) your only content post consisting mostly of things that have already been stated by others, just reworded and without any attribution to the original source and b) making a comment with a bit of added stuff and referring to the original source; while that comment is only a little part of the whole content made by the person? You do notice you used your post in question to get your vote on someone, while I made a comment in passing between the other stuff I was writing about, right? Hell, if you thought ActionDan was the most suspicious person and you really had absolutely nothing further you could add to the case or ask him, great, happens, vote the one you find most suspicious, it's what you should do. It won't be as bad if you make up for it by searching for other interesting things you
can add to anything. You didn't. Hence you get the big stick.
Omba can you answer this question too please.
I already did when I indirectly stated that the assumption you're making here is false. You're making it sound like those were the only two other options you had. Which is not the case.
I said do something useful. If nothing useful is immediately apparent, try to think of something. You can't go claiming miller in a vanilla game, but it's not like you have to take measures that drastic.
Actually, just read my answer to Bardiche directly above your post.
Side note: You had no issues with basically parroting Pesco to get the chance to vote anything. I don't know why you would have a bigger problem with doing that at the end of RVS. Well, there's some possible explanations for it but that's not the point here.
