OKAY. My mafia'ing has been irresponsible between IRL things and then Touhou 15 coming out today and d1 being even more bleh than usual from not having a lynch to stimulate discussion. Thankfully, we have nighttalk so I can correct this :D Time to properly assert myself.
At first I was going to say "First of all, Shalako is not scum." But then I realized he got in a slapfight with town d1 last game as scum, too? No, no, this looks completely different still. This Shalako is much more proactive, the attitude and playstyle isn't similar. It rings very town to me, even if I do not necessarily agree with his conclusions/methods/whatever. (Someone was talking about "why are you spouting townreads aaa" earlier but since Shalako seems to be suspected by multiple people, I think this is a relevant one to mention.)
Overall, I think it's a town/town slapfight between him/Kilga, although I'm not as strongly sold on Kilga!town all things considered. Now that I look at it again, I mean, I still think Kilga's actions for most of the day were fine, but eventually it does start looking somewhat overblown. I think this might just be happening due to the low discussion weird D1-without-a-lynch environment? TBH I probably shouldn't say it looks like a town/town slapfight because I'm actually thinking I should probably keep an eye on Kilga, especially because I know he's a good player that probably won't be obvious if he's scum. Really, what I would like to help read his slot is reading stuff that isn't from a slapfight :V That's what D2 will be for though of course
I'm not sure why Raitaki is being showered in town praise :S I actually thought his earlier posts were pretty insignificant, and whilst #108 was an improvement that was -after- several people were already going "YEAH RAIKTAI IS DA MAN", and I still wouldn't expect that one to provoke such strong reactions from everyone. I could see him going either way. Apart from that, my interest is on CF7, and Dan is obviously, uhm, a thing that exists. CF7 just seems to spout reads and say "well, I think out of x/y/z... there is a scum! And from a/b/c... there is probably also a scum!" but the accompanying justification is fluff, and there doesn't really seem to be any logical correlation to why scums A and B should be in these groups. :S