##Vote: ConquerorConq is a primary suspect today given his rather irrelevant, nullish presence in D1 (ineffectual vote on Trickysticks, choice between two town reads at end), and a D2 fixation on BT fluffed up far beyond the acceptable limits of 'he kept going for Dormio on D2', which has been proven rather incorrect with BT's Conq vote. Combine this with a clear of PX which expresses denial at only one facet of huhwhat's case
here without further elaboration (though Zakeri did this too), and all the irrelevant questions asked (answers to which he did not use), I don't think he engaged in any more than pretend scumhunting and slippery play befitting of scum up till now.
While I do dislike his style of play, and Helepolis is indeed suspicious for whatever people are saying right now, I think it is being blown out of proportion, since in
this post he gave valid reasons as to why rawr was scummier than PX, though they may be rather subjective and disagreeable (e.g shadow puppetry). Much better than jumps by huhwhat and Dormio, even though it happened before PX's claim. If anything, it goes to show how useless lists are.
Only reason I'm letting Dormio off for now is because PX voted him before going for Serela on D1, which on the surface did not seem needed. Otherwise, I feel that his play has been pretty scummy for reasons already stated.
Not so sure on pesco's reaction to PX's claim. On one hand, he argues as to why Shadoweh would have been the better choice for a tracker to track D1, and on another, he says that it's no surprise that PX used Keine to decide targets, which seems awfully vague. Could he clear this up?
Lastly, the way Zakeri phrased his vote against huhwhat
here, it seemed as if he was voting huhwhat for 'listing potential vig targets' and a bad PX case. Was this a pending judgement? If so, Zakeri had shown no other position other than PX looking town and Shadoweh looking suspicious from D2 onwards, which is rather questionable.
===
@huhwhat: In
this post, I was suspicious of PX's jump on Dan even though he raised the same points against Shadoweh, which was no foundation for anything more than a question at that time, I feel. What do you mean by 'slamming down a serious case'?