@Rou:
##UnvoteOkay, I am satisfied with your post due to the consideration of connections and the fair amount of original points being brought up.
Admits later he will vote when Zak responds, but by D3 seems to have disregarded his case altogether, going for me instead for tunnelling Pesco. Why didn't he move his vote to Zakeri even after he got his response?
I did move my vote to Zakeri, I think.
Here As for my D3 actions, I feel that he had already explained his actions thoroughly enough for me to put off any more questioning. However, of course, I don't think his explanations were completely satisfactory, so I do feel that he's still scummy at the moment.
As for the Dorian business, I admit that I focused too much on the only good point he had, but it was all for the purpose of questioning Serp's vote and trying to make him elaborate further. The lurkiness and the fallacies I didn't acknoledge, but I was quite aware of them and didn't want to mention them due to they being talked about lots already. I also thought there were relatively more interesting targets that day like donut and NF and wanted to give him a free pass until day two or so as he had something redeeming to him.
Lastly, the switch from NF to donut instead of pesco was because I felt that pesco wasn't doing overtly scummy by deflecting donut's question (this opinion is strengthened since donut flipped town). Since donut was waffling a little bit, I felt that voting him was better.
---
@Kiro:
The fact that you vote Roukan and make no mention of Pesco who by now is reasonably suspicious is what's putting you on my scumdar now.
I never said that Rou was more suspicious than pesco. The vote was just a means of pressure rather than a statement pointing towards who I think is most scummy; I was merely calling him out on something I noticed. pesco was already getting a bulk of the votes with more than enough reasons, elaborated, after all; thus I didn't think my vote on him would be as important or useful at the start of D3
If one shouldn't be "attacking people for voting him (Nuclear Fusion)," why does it look like you're attacking Rou for voting Pesco?
I was attacking Rou for voting pesco
only the past days, so I don't think there is a basis for comparison.
I don't know where you think I mentioned something like the above. Care to explain?
You said Carthrat was not as scummy due to the fact that he didn't vote donut on D1. This should not have been the case.
Also,
Voting Donut was a mistake, but 5 other people did the same thing too. Marking that as your first main point against him is iffy.
Again, reasons, reasons, reasons, etc. It seems hypocritical that you sometimes analyze the bandwagons without the reasons behind the votes when there is a flip, and analyze the reasons behind votes only when there is no flip available.
---
pesco is irritatingly scummy due to his shady nature and very minimal scumhunting which does not seem effective at all. The only notable thing he posted in the entire game in terms of scumhunting worth was on NF, but even that was minimal on the account that it was easy to find bad things about him anyway. I'm not going to consider his claimed role for this; anyone can claim a flavour role and keep it ambiguous after all. Preferred lynch for today, but I'll hold my vote.