Darkie "OH NO TOO MANY VIGS IN ONE GAME WHO PROBABLY NEVER GET TO SHOOT ANYWAY"
Seriously, BT's vig had a -very- low chance of coming to fruition if you seriously think about it, Conq's vig activating practially guarentee's BT's will not AND also just balances out town's no-lynch (so town comes out with the same number of town-minded kills as if they had lynched in the first place), and while I haven't claimed my conditional it is also pretty damn unlikely to happen, DESPITE HOW HOPEFUL I CONTINUE TO BE ABOUT IT
On a whole I do not agree with Dan wagon, the major point being made is that he's lurking
Nope, you're looking at it wrong. Dan isn't just "lurking", he pretty much literally refused to scumhunt even when people were hounding him about it (he -eventually- gave in and said he'd read some people, but not only has he not done it and it's been over 30 hours (!?), it doesn't make up for the previous talk being nigh-unimaginable from a town player)
He tried to use a town clear (that is -not- in actuality a town clear) as why he wasn't going to scumhunt when confronted about it, and instead of trying to do any scumhunting he put his effort into arguing his confirmed-town-ness instead, and then OMGUS'd people who voted him anyway (which is also -really really scummy-)
The case is not "Dan is lurking". It was that at the beginning of D2, but since then he's done a lot of super scummy stuff as soon as people actually scrutinized him, and then dropped off the face of the planet to boot. If PX wasn't taking an abnormal stance of not punishing lurkers, Dan would be in danger-of-modkill territory right now. (But he's not, so we have to lynch him instead)
I'm also not sure I understand why you think HW is baseless. While overrelying on Meta is bad, and in some cases HW does ADMIT his read isn't so solid and more just "I think I'm good at reading this person" and he admits it openly (it's not like it's for his scumreads anyway), I don't think this applies to most of his reads or anything >_>
If you've played in a place with a small playerbase for multiple years, you're going to be using previous knowledge of their play as you read them. And it's probably going ot be helpful. While people do tend to try to change, there's only so much they can do- they're very likely to act similarly to how they have in the past, because it's just how they work.
You saw HW has a lack of a clear case towards anyway, but I think his Dan thing is sufficient? He didn't say a lot about Dan, but quite honestly, Dan is a very open-and-shut case. All there really is to it is stating whether you agree or disagree it makes him scum.
Conq's too good, I would prefer to test his claim instead. Which is easy, either by us not lynching or me investigating, I would recommend the former.
Conq's "too good"? What is this supposed to mean? Anyway, we're not no-lynching. What if Conq just gets nightkilled or the scum can roleblock him or something? Even if we have a doc (err, jailer?), scum might have a strongman kill to go through it; with what we know of the setup so far that's not unlikely.
Investigating him is useless. Whether he's scum or town telling the truth, he's going to come up "positive". It'd be a depressing waste of your night action. The only way you'd get a result other then "positive" is if he's town lying about having ITP conditionals which makes absolutely no sense and means we still don't want to lynch him anyway. (I highly doubt scum has a person with immunity to your cop because half the townies are already false positives, any more would mean PX is a dick)
Plus there's the fact that he also gladly went with the ''sheep whoever is okay'' stance DESPITE
I don't have a lot of time because I have work soon so I'd rather just ask you to show me where he does this (HW tends to joke a good bit as forewarning, also you might be interpreting something wrong)
please genuinely match his posting behavior and how quickly and willingly he obliged to my accusation of not having posted enough instead of explaining why beforehand he DIDN'T DO SO.
I'm confused

I don't understand. Please explain. Anyway the other two parts of "why serela should die" are silly shenanigans about me having a conditional vig, which I already explained.