alright, i think it's between bard/schezo/nnr. paperblade reactions here werent as illuminating because there wasn't any meaningful interaction either way.
Bard's content upon replacing in has basically been a one-track pursuit of BT. And from what I can tell his case on BT is basically "BT dropped his Conq case"
BT I'm going to say that I don't think I'm looking too much into it. You keep flip-flopping about Conq being suspicious and then even if you're not pushing him suddenly dropping him into less suspicious seems superfluous and artificial, like padding your posts to say "hey guys I have opinions on other guys as well!" when you're effectively just interested in one main guy anyway.
I'm biased here because I know I'm town, but assuming I'm town (I don't know what you're assuming since you've never given a direct opinion on me) why is it scummy for BT to stop pursuit of a townie to look for scum elsewhere? Comparing this to padding a case with fluff is a pretty big reach.
I've been rereading Schezo's case on BT and I'm just confused as to why he thinks BT is scum. Okay, so you "know BT's case wasn't genuine," why? I can buy you missing CF7's claim from D1 but after that's all resolved the back and forth between you and BT just reads like a battle of rhetoric. And after the initial vote on SB, that's basically all Schezo has for the day.
NNR, why did it take you until a Paperblade wagon was already going before you mentioned Paperblade's ascetic claim conflicting with your claim and SB's claim? I also think NNR isn't reading Dormio's posts and is just brushing them off as confusing walls.
Having a confusing writeup every 12 hours is definitely a good way to look active and get away with not really playing, you know. Add this to the fact you can essentially say "Covered him, time to ignore for the next 3 days" means you can just tunnel whoever but say you still have reads on other people.
The walls themselves are pointlessly jumbo and just make me want to simply skip them (Which might be your plan). Why not just write paragraph like everyone else and stick a definitive read (scum, town, null, leaning)? Is that so hard? Your posts are just hard to read, nd the amount of time you put between them makes the older ones worthless after a couple days.
Stuff like this is basically a playstyle attack; he's not attacking the content, he's attacking the way it's presented. NNR, why is Dormio scum?
As for BT himself, there's nothing in BT's posts in the thread that couldn't have come from BT!scum I guess but I think the way he's pressing on NNR and Schezo makes sense from a theoretical town!BT. In any case the way he's questioning people is townier than the one-track pursuits by the people mentioned above, because having only one scum read at this stage of the game is just terrible. There's also other stuff that makes me lean towards BT!town that will either become clear with my flip or that I might elaborate on tomorrow.
flips dont change my opinion on zak/sb being not!mafia, plus sb and paperblade setting up to counterclaim each other in the beginning of the game would be lol. third party zak is plausible given that paperblade's flip implies some sort of nonmafia killing role but we'll cross that bridge if we ever get there.
