Warning - while you were typing 21 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.Oops.
##Vote NNRThere are a lot, and I mean a lot, of retarded things in NNR's posts.
However what we're looking for is scumminess, not stupidity, so I've been trying to read NNR's posts whilst ignoring all of the idiotic things he's spouting.
It's hard. Whatever.
First of all, let's take a look at NNR's D1. (It's pathetic.)
For the first portion of the game,
NNR votes HW on the sole basis that he's calling Serela town.
Doesn't bother explaining why this is scum HW talking. Doesn't bother stating his opinion of HW. Doesn't bother stating his opinion of Serela.
Just votes HW and keeps asking for evidence of Serela being town.
He finally gives up the point
here and replaces it with something really weird.
Like, I seriously don't get that vote on Raikaria.
Pretty obvious, but he's fallen into a pit trap where he's only defending himself (and doing it badly) and not hunting scum .
##Vote: Raikaria until he can actually come up with some scumreads, seriously.
The fuck?
You claim that it's obvious that Raikaria has fallen into a "trap" where he's forced to focus on defending himself, and yet you vote for Raikaria in the same post for focussing on defending himself.
If it's so obviously a trap, as you claimed it to be, why did you add to the votes on Raikaria so as to further increase the pressure on him and force even more defensive play?
Going for the easy vote, were we?
And then, we have a brief jump back to
voting HW before he swings back to
Raikaria.
Throughout this particular sequence, NNR does exactly what he originally accused Raikaria of doing and focuses only on defending himself.
Why didn't he follow his own advice and do what he claims he normally would have done as town?
I don't like
this post either.
Ignoring the part where he blatantly oversimplifies my case and brushes it off as focusing only on RVS, the thing I find interesting in this post is the part where he says that he agrees a lot with HW.
The same HW that he
continues to
question and throw doubt upon the claim of.
It's like, NNR finds HW to be townie enough to follow his thoughts whenever it's convenient for him, and HW is scummy and obviously lying through his teeth at any other time.
I guess it's really easy to only see what you want to see.
And then we have
these two godawful posts.
You know, for someone that claims that I'm scummy for making posts that are too long and therefore hard to read, you sure do seem to like doing the same.
Except your posts have no focus and are extremely difficult to follow as a result, and they don't even tell us anything.
And to think this is the person that's constantly (incorrectly) accusing me of not reaching any conclusions.
Really, there is absolutely nothing to glean from these posts other than some sniping at my posts which I'll get to later.
I'm not really seeing Town!Raikaria or Town!CF7 though, but maybe it's because I'm not really getting why they would be after 45 hours of badposts
Oh, hey, suddenly you see either Raikaria or CF7 as being scum.
Let's just ignore the fact that you hadn't really addressed CF7 until that point in time.
A few mentions in your "notepad" posts don't count.
CF7 has totally been doing some scummy shit and you sure are glad that there's a wagon on him.
Seriously, what the fuck is this pushing of both the wagons.
Another thing I'd like to note about NNR's D1 is how hard he was cheerleading my wagon.
Dormio 185 is holy shit tldr
except I am reading it anyway
what the hell is all this
prolonging the RVS...
this is literally a text wall on RVS posts, fuck.
I dunno if I can even agree with this stuff, and I'm voting Raikaria. It's really :tryhard: though, and doesn't have any other reads
HW 196 has many agreeable statments, like on Dormio, and stuff on Kilga I failed to notice because I'm awful at mafia. lurker lynch on D1 seems :I tho, kind of an iffy suggestion
More Dormio posts that are long and also long and :tryhard:. It doesn't even have a read at the end, just a "I dunno"
Lol he's responding to Dormio's post. I would honestly have just brushed it off, that's a bunch of nitpicky shit he's addressing
Dormio are you going to give conclusive reads to anyone you make a text wall on
Satisfying Dormio vote from Kilga. Dormio getting called out on his shitposting is good.
Still 5 pages from the end of this but so far I want to lynch between Dormio, CF7, and Raikaria
I kinda want to lynch Dormio for being the most worthless and making a bunch of inconclusive text walls tbh
I liked the time when you actually voted for me or tried to put any pressure on me for being so apparently scummy.
Wait a second. That's right, you never did.
Perhaps this was because my wagon never picked up steam?
Got to hold your vote until the lynch looks viable, right?
Just like the one on CF7.
And then we begin D2 with
this.
Of course, since you mislynched Raikaria the other day and conveniently lost access to the thread before you could switch your vote, this means that you can now casually switch your vote over to CF7 since that's who you were actually planning to lynch the other day.
Isn't that wonderful for you?
I believe this thought process is supported by how you poke at CF7 with various suspicions during the beginning of the day but ultimately drop them when other people don't show enough interest.
Let's move on to
here now.
>I am still on every scumread list
>I didn't expect to live to D2
;w;
Other people have already stated how this was overreactive, so I'm not going to dwell on it and merely point it out here.
However, when it comes to things like this:
Ugh, these are just awful. He could not sit on the fence any harder about his non-Raikaria reads, In fact, he more or less just coasted on the Raikaria vote to the end of the day. Now only today does CF7 suddenly look interesting enough to vote.
This statement is outright untrue, like I've said on multiple occasions.
I do not understand how NNR reached the conclusion that I had no read on CF7, when I said that I simply preferred Raikaria's lynch.
I've clarified this time and time again, yet NNR refuses to acknowledge my words and instead repeats the same sentiment that I was supposedly undecided on every read bar Raikaria.
Like really. What the fuck.
Also, the fact that NNR is actually using something like this as an actual grounds for suspicion...
Had a bunch of really lame text walls throughout D1, which is odd because he was also "busy" but had time to make a bunch of text wall reads,
Really?
Really? Is this the best you could come up with?
How the fuck does this make me scum?
Really. I want an explanation on this point.
Because, to me, it looks as though you were just trying to pad out your case on me with meaningless bullshit.
For the rest of the day, NNR really doesn't do much.
He notes some suspicion of Paperblade
here.
Kind of want to vote Paperblade despite him also voting Dormio with me. His lack of post content is really glaring. He needs more reads on other big people like Schezo and BT, more active participation.
It's really weak and, to me, it almost looks as though he's just getting himself ready for a jump in case his buddy is actually going to get lynched that day.
Note the casual distancing by mentioning that NNR has gained some suspicion despite the fact they're both voting for me.
In other words, NNR is trying to say that he's voting me for a different reason that Paperblade and shouldn't be associated with Paperblade as a result.
Put in other words again, NNR looks like he's just making all the preparations in case Paperblade is lynched.
He also has this insightful piece to say.
I kind of want to see Zak lynched tomorrow just so we could see if we can't confirm another townie.
What the fuck?
Really? I don't think I really have to say much about this.
And then, finally, let's move onto NNR's content for today.
In particular, the first thing I want to look at is this:
Having a confusing writeup every 12 hours is definitely a good way to look active and get away with not really playing, you know. Add this to the fact you can essentially say "Covered him, time to ignore for the next 3 days" means you can just tunnel whoever but say you still have reads on other people.
I haven't liked Dormio's reactions so far in the game, and I still don't like how he posts walls on people then leaves them alone in terms of reading. I see it as posting to look town/active, not posting to hunt scum. If that's a playstyle complaint, then ???? I dunno how to react to that. If it's meta then :meta: I don't tend to play around with that.
This is just plain bullshit.
Like, I get that you're trying to paint a case on me, but at least try to make it convincing and get your facts straight.
Making desperation arguments like this is just sad.
To take it apart piece by piece, let's start with your statement that my posts are confusing.
How so? I don't think that my posts are confusing in the slightest.
The only thing that may make them slightly hard to read is length, but if you can't even bother reading ~500 of my words, I think that you're just being lazy.
Secondly, the statement that I'm forgetting about any person that I make a case on so that I can say something to the effect of "covered this guy, let's move on".
What. Tell me, where have I ever ignored someone? I answer questions and provide clarification, I don't really know what more you want.
And, finally, I have reads on other people.
How the fuck is this meant to even be a point against me?
It's pretty pathetic to see someone that desperate for additional arguments in a case.
Also, inb4 NNR calls this post inconclusive too.
