Reading from my phone
Not the optimal method
But it's all I've got
So I still like Affinity's Day 1, though I admit this may be because of how closely it mirrored mine. Still, he had a stated preference for the Serela wagon over the NNR wagon.
PX/Serela Day 1 stuff has been discussed and does indeed look bad. Affinity's observation at the end of his #367 is a particularly noteworthy point against PX.
As for Day 2, I find the thread of PX question "why would Serela self-hammer instead of letting Omba hammer" -> my response question "What town credit would Omba have gained from hammering Serela after Serela goofed" -> PX response(?) question "Would Omba really let Serela do all that stupid stuff if they were buddies" very unimpressive. The second question is faulty on its own because his Affinity vote meant he believed Affinity WOULD let Serela do all that stupid stuff and I don't think there's any reason to believe that's the case. In addition, if the second question was indeed a follow-up to the first, then it's a non-sequitur, and if it isn't, then it means PX jettisoned a bad justification for another bad justification. Either way, it reads strongly as someone that knew Omba was town and was trying to get creit for claiming Omba was town while Omba was under heavy fire.
Affinity's BT vote seems completely out of left field, in that I can't figure out what kind of motivation is behind it. I do not fault him too much for his PX vote, though; Omba was at L-2 already at that point, so I can understand not actually voting Omba then even if he wanted to. That it was a vote apparently entirely founded on PX's most recent post and not D1 stuff is bizarre and makes it look OMGUSy, but there's OMGUS and then there's OMGUS, if that makes any sense.
I don't think either are perfectly clean but I think PX's approach to Serela and Omba are scummier than anything Affinity has done.
##Vote: PX