Pesco has not contributed to town in the way he thinks.
Pesco's FPMH vote on Schezo for hios "fluff" post was fine. Schezo made a bad post, Schezo got punished. Pesco was the not the only one to see this of course, with HW and Omba launching an attack for the same reasons. Pesco can claim responsibility for discussion around Schezo and for reactions associated with it all he wants, but that doesn't change the fact that Pesco's power is limited to a vote + Pesco's own words. It's simply causality that people other than Pesco attacked Schezo and that Schezo himself developed various reads. What is actually important is what Pesco's own participation in the conversation entailed. And looking back at Pesco's posts during that time, it should be quite clear Pesco didn't do a whole lot of anything, either in reads of people, or in content.
#137 attempts to link up with the Omba/Schezo discussion. While both have given a good amount of content, Pesco is only willing to cherry pick from these posts without giving substantial opinions on what he thinks is scummy. Quoting selections of text and offering up small prods is interpreted by me as scum coasting. For example, here's a comment about Schezo's vote on Omba.
"You'd have to do better than that if you want to OMGUS. Put Omba aside for a moment and tell me about Dan and PX."
Whilst discrediting it as OMGUS, you don't quite say if it's scummy. At this point Schezo had already made a post about me and PX, and considering PX hadn't posted again, and you didn't ask Schezo anything specifically about me or PX, I see why you are holding back here. This is scum stalling the day and pretending to be useful.
Where are your reads already? It's a lovely thing to prod people. But I don't think you've made anything out of it.
This has been a long time coming. And it only comes after people have solidified their reads of Schezo (mostly as town Schezo) and after a few people have voted me. You waited to see what would fly and only gave these measly reads once after you felt comfortable that they would conform to popular opinion that no one would take a 2nd glance. I had already called you on keeping my case in the
backround as well.
Flipped my Shit. You had a stronger case for me being scum than whatever your vote for Schezo implied, so saying that in ISO my votepost for PX could be interpreted as a OMGUS and forgetting your case against constructed FORM THAT VERY POST is not just a mistake, its scummy as all get-out. It tells me that you must not have felt that strong about it, since you forgot about it. Secondly, your presenting an argument to town based on a falsehood is scummy for misrepping. You brush that off saying "w/e town can go back and read," but obviously town isn't going to do that so readily and catch your mistake. Furthermore if you are happy with saying my vote on Dormio feels like OMGUS, you should be able to agree with Dormio's case. You haven't commented on Dormio's case at all. I thought Dormio's case was garbage. I don't think you bothered to read why, or else you'd have something more to say about it.
Dormio has yet to answer my questions from my votepost of him. Dormio is getting away with murder.
Pesco's case on me is "specious voting analysis" whilst discrediting my content as parroting or shit-flinging. And the fact that more people voting me means I'm cornered scum, which is patently stupid.
