Yeah, you just scared me away, no duties I had to take care of. GJ
Omba's
128 case on me:
1. fine
2. How does hypocrisy feel?
Then you go ahead with the post you just made and do the same things you just called me out on.
Your response to my request:
Durrr... :V
What do you get when after picking something apart, there's nothing left? Right, a lack of something. These lines are not tacked on, they're the conclusion I've reached from the posts you made and the answers you gave me.
I didn't know stopping to answer your questions was scummy, especially when NO ONE HAD FUCKING POSTED on our spat at that time.
Again, let's go back to this quote
It's like a fucking marry-go-round.
I mostly was waiting on HW to get his bitchass in here and weigh in on what he thought of our 1v1 earlier, being that he was instumental to getting my wagon going and everything but no, he's content to just lurklurklurk lurk this shit out. Did I want to go back and make content on people after I already posted and dear God get called for backtracking. No, not when our 1 on 1 was going because I wanted to form a more solid opinion on people, and what they thought of our thing, since it's one of the most serious and drawn out things that has happened all day. A few have posted about it now let's get to that in a sec.
... Seriously? You're not seeing the difference between a) your only content post consisting mostly of things that have already been stated by others, just reworded and without any attribution to the original source and b) making a comment with a bit of added stuff and referring to the original source; while that comment is only a little part of the whole content made by the person? You do notice you used your post in question to get your vote on someone, while I made a comment in passing between the other stuff I was writing about, right? Hell, if you thought ActionDan was the most suspicious person and you really had absolutely nothing further you could add to the case or ask him, great, happens, vote the one you find most suspicious, it's what you should do. It won't be as bad if you make up for it by searching for other interesting things you can add to anything. You didn't. Hence you get the big stick.
No, look at your entire
121 and tell me it's not just copied. The only thing you added was an advice remark to Job and Dan, and that's it. What it's fine now since Pesco said it and you give him credit? Then what in the fuck is the point if you're reposting JUST to make so fucking noise?
Argh, the reason it's driving me up the wall is that your case on me is built on "Schezo made noise and nothing else" and then you proceed to make a post that mirrors this and screams hypocrisy to my ears. It's why it's bothering me so much that your backing it up.
I already did when I indirectly stated that the assumption you're making here is false. You're making it sound like those were the only two other options you had. Which is not the case.
I said do something useful. If nothing useful is immediately apparent, try to think of something. You can't go claiming miller in a vanilla game, but it's not like you have to take measures that drastic.
Actually, just read my answer to Bardiche directly above your post.
Side note: You had no issues with basically parroting Pesco to get the chance to vote anything. I don't know why you would have a bigger problem with doing that at the end of RVS. Well, there's some possible explanations for it but that's not the point here.
This is why I was adamant about you quoting where you're pulling your facts from. I'm not going to read between the lines just to get an indirect answer that you can claim false on. I want a straight one. For this:
No, that was the case you presented on me and what I could do:
-Force something on someone when I didn't find anything not already said to pursue
-lurk
I kid you fucking not that's what you did. And now I have your direct answer that you did indeed.
So, in
your response to Bardiche that you told me to look at, I think I've garnered what you're doing that making me insane.
I taking from this, you're only looking at the logical aspects of the game and it has to be cut and dry, townie does this scum does that. I don't think you're taking into account grey areas and exceptions which are always bound to come up in this game.
I look faulty in all ways on paper. I was thinking your engagement with me earlier was just a prod to try and see my emotional side and if that was scum or not.
So I've drawn from this that you either aren't taking emotions into account and writing up the black and white case that's easy to see or you find me fraudulent.
Anyways the omgus on you was heat of passion even if I deplore your reasoning.
##Unvote:I'm going to get this out there and post the scumz reads like now.