Come on people, let's actually play the game...you got an answer, and if wasn't the one you wanted, big deal...shrug and move on. You can't control the answers you get, only the questions you ask.
There's a difference between a silly answer, which is acceptable, and a non-answer, which is being too lazy/too impatient to even attempt an answer/wait for someone else to answer but the person wants THEIR question answered, so they put down a non-answer and ask theirs. Seems kind of unfair, right?
To give you an idea of how annoying that is...
Since there was no question for me to answer:
What if...
Eiji Hino, aka Kamen Rider OOO, found himself in Gensokyo? Oh, and due to the nature of Gensokyo, he has the Medals, OOO Driver, and O-Scanner, back with him.
Never heard of him.
<insert What If question here>
That is a non-answer, and it is infuriating. Which is exactly what
I wouldn't watch them. MiB is too scary...
is, a non-answer. I mean, I understand silly answers, but that's just rude.
And technically, you did have a question to answer if you're going to defend HawkPath1337's answer.
What if Yamame played Baldur's Gate?
was his question. Just trying to knock this thread back into a straight Q & A line before it topples. So, which is it?
Don't want to get into a flame war, mind you. Just trying to explain that there's a difference between "not getting the answer you wanted" and an answer that DOESN'T address the question and only exists so that the person can ask their question.