Conqueror, so I am as unreadable as ever? You yell this each game, I sadfaze.
As for my vote switching away from UK, it's because there's no one who shares my belief that she deserves a vote, and no one is interested in the handwave that "it's not worth my time". By now Huh What is a far more interesting and productive way of using my vote, as he certainly is racking up Scum Points as far as I'm concerned.
Speaking of, I am prepared to take Conq's claim at face value - if it's a scum ploy, then the merits do not outweigh the immediate risk of it all and so it's cools by me to get a "safe" lynch for the day.
My preferred target is, of course, Huh What. Between my last post and now, nothing has changed to ameliorate my opinion of him, and it remains to be at a quite low level. His explanation for his early actions may be somewhat adequate, but it lacks motivation. I still find the explanation that "I believed you were honestly thinking you could get Serela lynched by voting him while everyone's in RVS mode" (paraphrased) is a major stretch of the imagination and an absurd logic.
That your defence is "I derped" isn't too damnable, except
you do this with everything. When Kilgamayan raises a point about your
inattentiveness, you explain you were derp. Defences like
presented here are generally poor, in that it's already clear it's your opinion. And then you add an extra clause that boils down to, "But I could be wrong :V".
Fascinating, but we already know no one's infallible in this game! There's also your sudden "lowering of suspicion" for Conqueror coinciding with the time he roleclaims, and yet you still stubbornly throw in an idea it could all be a scum gambit! Gasp, shock! If he's lying it'd get him lynched and implicate scum buddies, it's really not a worthwhile trick and you not only entertaining the idea but also throwing it out in the open feels like an attempt to "test the waters", so to speak, for a Conq lynch today to halt his ability.
I'd prefer Huh What be lynched today, but if I can't get people to get on board with me to my sunset, I guess I'll have to board someone else's.
Of the three cases presented today, I feel that the Conq case warrants no votes. That leaves PX and NeoSerela.
To me, PX is nowhere near "not scum". Particularly
this post reads oddly, as he praises the Conqueror wagon for being legitimate due to people finding original reasons to jump on him, but then says "I agree with the Conq wagon" and jumps on like a bandwagon hop.
This makes me sadfaze.
The rest of PX's posts express little desire to play and much rage about deleted posts so I don't know about that. If PX doesn't feel like playing, I'd like to ask him to fix that attitude. It's not something I would lynch for, and one point of hypocrisy doesn't raise my heckles so much I want to use a lynch on it.
NeoSerela's voting patterns however evidence of thoughtlessness and easy stances. Take, for example,
the first vote he makes, which is for Conq on account that "capt h is an easy vote target", despite never elucidating how this is so? It assumes that all of town is easily manipulated, which is simply not true. That he jumps to Zakeri on an equally thoughtless basis just evidences a lack of effort, and contradicts himself directly; after all, he voted Conq for taking an easy stance, but voting Zakeri was also an easy stance at the time.
NeoSerela's input thus far amounts to absolutely nothing. Lots of derping it up hard by being thoughtless.
However, there is absolutely no support for NeoSerela that I can gather, and I just can't see how it could be scum motivated to kick open such open doors. It's more laziness, and laziness of such a level I cannot quite consider it immediately scummy. I'd prefer a PX lynch over a Serela lynch simply because PX declared lack of motivation to play, whereas Serela can still make good on the lacking content and major derpage of this Day.
Alright, I dislike both trains then. I can't convince people to last-minute switch to Huh What, I suppose?
