Why the PX softclaim is holding my vote back should be self-explanatory. Are you asking me to vote for you despite PX declaring you "confirmed town?" Are you implying that you're scum and PX is wrong or are you just being obtuse?
You think I'm scum. That's why you're pseudo-voting for me, isn't it? Which means you think PX's claim is false. Why are you stopping yourself from voting due to a claim that you don't believe in?
#547 looks to finally be the case on me.
No? This post serves to explain why I
still think you're scum.
I don't really recall saying this, refresh my memory?
I'm probably going to highly regret this and confirm everyone thinking of me as scum for this, but whatever.
##Unvote
##Vote Serela
Zero motivation vote. You had enough time to pick a target you're actually fine with until D1 was over, but it seems you just went with Serela for being the next thing to have the possiblity of being lynched.
The Shadoweh vote was bandwagon-ish and bad. The HW case was bad. The reason you're after me, like Affinity noted, is bad. And now your case on Helepolis reminds me of Shadoweh's on Rawr. We can all see his less-than-stellar play. Why did this just seem like a convenient way to show that you have some other content?
Secondly, the more productive thing. What is this?
Productiveness is when you get town closer to identifying and lynching scum. Your cases weren't productive and you're not doing much else. Your early D1 was
terribly counterproductive because you
refused to produce content by insisting on getting answers from Shadweh/Conq that would amount to nothing in the first place and seemed like a bad excuse for not actually playing the game.
He's also stated that he'll keep his vote on me for as long as it takes for me to be lynched, which is a thing.
What kind of horrible misrep is this? I said I'd lynch you so long as you are my main scumpick. Whether or not this will last for the rest of the game is your opinion, not a fact.
And, for some reason, you understand my case as "you were stuck on one vote so you're scum"? Of course I'm coming off as a huge hypocrite if this is true, which it isn't.
I'm skimming over -opinions- and people are still insistent on Town!Dormio.
##Unvote Seriously, if this changes, I'll be back on my vote in record time.
And PX/HW are still town. Why is Pesco locking the vote and making me choose between them? 8 hours is plenty of time, no? HW's wagon is composed by iffy cases to begin with, so I find this act odd in a bad way! Almost like scum are subtly pushing for PX/HW!
#534 and #535 is bad timing on my part but I haven't liked your content all game.
No. Why do you expect me to believe this? You've said not one bad (or good) word on me the entire game up to #534. If my content bugged you, the least you could have done was graced the thread with a minor comment. You claim that my D1 case wasn't a cause for a lynch
here, and unless you never commented on it for no reason whatsoever, I conclude that you thought it was fine. Which is it? Was my content bad all game and you're bad for never commenting on it? Or is your finding me scummy a new thing and something else was the cause for that?
I made it clear that I still want a Dormio flip on #456, which was quite early on in the day. When has "I don't like BT for his wanting Dormio flipped on D2 AS WELL AS D1 JESUS CHRIST"- and "I thought BT was bad all along"-Conq posted in the thread after my case? Here, #517. And, in more detail, #532 and #534. Where he goes from initially not mentioning me at all, to comparing me to Bardiche in how we're both sticking to our Dormio votes, and only then started expanding on why he thinks I'm bad. Why is this done in steps? Because Conq re-read me, possibly for the first time in the game, while doing this. He initially starts calling my case bad only because he's 'failed to understand it' and isn't convinced, and finally settled on "he's bad only for the reason that he's actually staying with the case" a day later.
This is when Conq started getting interested in my lynch; when I was a relevant lynch target, when Affinity and Pesco had expressed dislike and Dormio made his huge misrep case.
##Vote ConqThis reeks. Badly. If I can't have a Dormio flip, this is the next best thing.
Also, I would not be doing this if not for a fact that plenty of people are unsure of their Conq reads and this lynch is perfectly possible. As a townie that wants to avoid another mislynch, I won't force myself to vote one of two people that I think are town,
unlike Dormio (latter link is to show his reads). Instead, I want a lynch that might actually lynch a scum.
@Helepolis: Why lists?
