Now we're getting somewhere. I highlighted #3 as what I felt to be your main reason, as I felt the accusation that Dormio was taking advantage of other people's words to be a heavier accusation than the lack of commitment and finding Shadoweh scummier; the latter I don't tend to vote on this early in the game, as who you find scummy is hardly an indication of your own scum status.
To elucidate why I found the non-commitment a small thing, it is because Dormio has not only pointed to the people he dislikes most right now, he is also voting Shadoweh. This seems like a commitment to the idea that either one of two or both are scum. I'll note he asked a question
of the two of them, which at least also implies some form of commitment. If anything I would consider it a degree of OMGUS and fencesitting, but I am uninterested at present to pursue that as I eagerly await Dormio's further actions.
That he votes Shadoweh over Conq seems more to be an issue of where his jokevote landed, and a lack of decision of who is worst. I therefore did not consider it a valid thing to level at him, although I might at that if this state of indecision continues.
Thus. I do not think your main reasons check out entirely and it feels like a grasp at straws to push a fast case on someone. Why your vote was too strong a stretch just to be third of the wagon in spite of the other two votes being marginally substantial as well? Well, you know what they say.
Third on the wagon is scum.
Of Conq I express dislike now. That he has valid reason to at least pursue Huh What with questions (I believe they are valid concerns) but neglects this until prompted to
and in favour of his stated Dormio case, which is only that he likes PX better doesn't strike me as a pro-active town thing to do. Please explain why you feel that Dormio is scum, Conqueror.
Cut by Dormio breaking the indecision and bringing good reasons to the table.
Dan, why is Serela the best place to put your vote now?