There is very good reason to restrain power.
you choose to not restrain it, correct? You choose to believe everyone should have freedom?
Does that include the freedom to restrain others? As long as there is more than one human on this planet, someone's rights will always be infringed upon, because no one can have everything they want without someone else giving up what they want.
What you are suggesting is a world of anarchy, and a world of anarchy will never work. More importantly, we are the ones who stand to lose the most in such a world. If we keep our world in order, we keep ourselves at the top. We remove from power anyone who would use that power to destroy recklessly, and in doing so, we remain the most powerful. I don't see what you believe we could possibly gain from letting Pesco run amok.
According to International Mafia Research Studies, whenever a mafia group is about to enclose over a city, they occurpy about 25% of the town's populous. This percentage has never increased passed 35% thanks to the regulations we have in place. If we assume that a random part of a town's poulation is the mafia, with no preference given to hydras, then that means that town will have over 3 times the chance of having a hydra on their side than the mafia will. If we do not assume that this is random chance, then that simply means there will be less mafia members needed to kill their group off since one lynch will kill them both, instead of separately.
You also have missed my point entirely. The Hydra loophole was created to aid players in place of masonry. My point was that We have yet to discover what about masonry will allow separate slots to join together in trust, without combining them. My point had nothing to do with whether or not stone crafting helps us. The fact that this argument fills up half of your post makes me feel like you're just attempting to downplay my valid arguments.