It was different, mostly because you were actually providing reasoning as well as not lashing out at everyone that even THOUGHT about voting you.
Affinity, case in point. It's how I roll.
Pesco is far from someone who uses "set in stone" methods. He uses a few base guidelines and goes a wild. But, this doesn't have anything to do with your alignment really.
Did I ever say it did? No, just saying that Pesco is bad at the game and used a fallacy known as strawman to attack me. Besides, set in stone methods? You all assume that finding townies is a bad idea. I'm willing to prove that that is a viable tactic.
For someone who uses meta, I'd like to know why that first is such a bad tell
Dumb question. I will at least give reason behind my votes, logically consistent or not depending who you ask, but at least I give a trail for someone else to work off of and decide whether or not he or she likes me. Tee hee and other such stuff is just ambigious and can't be attacked properly with the exception of just saying that person has a lack of evidence behind the vote. At least with meta, I can point out previous actions, describe why it's similar and go with it.
Anyway, UK, going to hammer me or not? I'm waiting~
EDIT: Finding scum on the first day? Ha! Okay, here's the list that I haven't had time to really make because everything has been focused on me.
1. Sol for a lack of presence and inability to decide who he finds scummy.
2. Drake for the same reason as Sol.
3. Zakeri for the following quote:
I could start hating on Ramus' last post as well, but I think I'll just say that I'm not convinced I should remove my vote and leave it at that.
For letting everyone else do the work for him and leaving his vote on me because it's convinient.
4. Pesco for jumping to conclusions all too quickly.
Happy?
UK or Nietz, please grow a spine and hammer me already.