So this is going to be a wall and I'm going to quotestrip it by person (D2/2.5 only considered). Also yes it's excerpts that could be taken out of context, but since I'm linking to the actual post you can check the context if you so choose.
darkninja:
imho zakeri is just a bad townie, scum usually doesn't play that bad...
In the end, the one who irks me most is Serela...implies that he is being assisted, by scum.
"Too scummy to be scum" is bad logic. Also, 'improving play' does not mean that outside help is being given. It looks like a shoehorned Serela 'case', the relevant part of which is shown.
I am also a watered down cop, with the ability to investigate for any not pro-town motives. I copped Serela for n1 and returned positive, which combined with his earlier play and the fact that there's already a bunch of town wincons made me to question is this ''pro-town motive'' really is as how he claimed...That means I scumread you and your every single argument, Conqueror, I shall be taking it on you, just not now...Meanwhile I need to squeeze a fullclaim and his entire thought process from Serela, and it better be fast.
scumteam: Conq/Serela/Dan OR Ihavenoname
The reasoning, however, is perfectly understandable here, and fits with the case looking shoehorned in-it pretty much was. However, just throwing out a scumteam on D2...is not generally a good idea, even with this many players being obv/derp/probtown.
Notice how swift and passionately conqueror pushed for the respective wagons for pretty much any candidate. His dedication is also completely lacking in pursuing any of his cases.
I'm going to disagree on Conq, his cases have effort from my perspective.
darkninja verdict: misguided town, no longer scummy.Shadoweh:
Dan lurking was bad, but if he's being active in the QT I can understand it.
Giving Dan a free pass for QT shenanigans, maybe it's playstyle, maybe it's defending a buddy. (nope totally not colored by me currently reading Shadoweh and Dan as scum)
+the other stuff I said about her D1 somewhere in the thread that I can't be bothered to go find.
Shadoweh verdict: I don't know, honestly. Content shaped up a lot after being wagoned which is a good thing except I know Shadoweh is skilled enough to do that as scum. Probably still scum but I'd rather lynch...ActionDan:
Stuff I already covered
...
...and nothing else!
"I never want to play with ActionDan again if this is town behavior"
- "I must show moral offense to sell my vote!"
Though this was blatant OMGUS to perfectly valid sentiments.
ActionDan verdict: DIE THE DEATH SCUMBAG! I still don't care how amazing your 'play' in the QT is because your thread play is super scum 9000, and HW who is in the QT is not calling you town, as if I needed -more- reason to not move my vote right now.Serela:.... :C
I still like Serela. Serela is cool and had better not be tricking me :c
NNR:
This post is really good. However, outside of that...not too much other than a telegraphed switch to Shadoweh for reasons I completely agree with. Has claimed IRL reasons and I can believe that.
NNR verdict: Probably not scum but warrants a 2nd look if my scumreads turn up townValidonPolly:
On the one hand, Polly is really good and attacking him for what Validon did would be hypocritical of me :ohdear: . On the other hand, I still need to read Validon...
...and Validon did nothing but replace out on D2...but nothing jumps out at me as scummy from D1/N1 either.
Validon/Polly verdict: Stop voting me so we can be town buddies \
/
Zakeri:
I'm looking at his posts and seeing nothing wrong why can't I get a read ;_;
