I know it's 10:30 in the morning, but right now it's past bedtime, and that's the perfect time to begin too many iso rereads.
Conq: I can't find reasons for your switch to Mitsuki, what are they?
Shortly after my last post, CF7 claims Insomniac. I have no clue what Shadoweh's going on about, she seems way too confused.
Re: Mitsuki 136 - Looking back, I suppose you didn't say that.
In fact, I'm kind of struggling to figure out why I thought that the point of the post I was responding to was that you couldn't consolidate. I had to have read it wrong somehow.
The way CF7 talks about his role is making me regain whatever suspicions I had lost.
The part I don't like the most is how he tried to brush of Serela's pointing out that his role can be scum suited. Conq proved how a good scum can work with Insomniac, and it's even more of a moot point if what I'm reading about everyone being insomniac is true, since all it means is the game doesn't take a break after a lynch.
Re: Mitsuki 160 - I hope I've addressed most of that above (And yes I was uneasy about CF7 lynch at the time I posted that but change my mind again), but
"His claim is very easy to prove and it gives an advantage to town regardless of his alignment, so I think people voting him should reconsider and postpone the lynch."
I don't think this is strictly true. If he's scum, there could be a side that he's denying telling us. There's also the fact that if he's scum, he's scum, ergo lynch please.
Reading BT and Conq later is making me question my read again again. It's true there's more evidence to support he's just bein dumb than that he's lying, but that doesn't mean he's not lying is it? augh.
Zak's #118 looks kind of like he's overreacting to the 2 MAN STRONG DARK WAGON and doesn't really give scumreads aside from CF7. Do you have any others?
"Over"reacting is subjective. I was simply reacting to the wagons that had more than one vote at the time. It's one of the many shortcuts I've come up with for this game.
If I had anything else at the time of writing, I would have put it down then, so sorry but no.
Re: Shadoweh 178 - If I vote switch to Raikaria can I go to bed?
ZZZ~<3
I also wanted to know why Mitsuki wanted a nameclaim from me, but it looks like from post 176 that the reason is most likely a "Town misreading role" thing.
Reached Rai's Doc Claim, and I'm seeing it as null so far. Doctor is commonly claimed by both sides, and the restriction doesn't really do anything except make their existence as doctor more fitting in a game setup.
Conq talking about SK existing doesn't mean he's the SK. in fact, I'd think the SK would be the last person to bring up the idea of a third party, because that only increases brain activity towards catching him/herself.
Everything I could say right now that's insight is being stolen by NNR as I'm writing this post.
Cut: And BT.
This post is kind of bad that all I came up with is Raikaria's doc claim is null. I still think CF7 is more likely to be not-town than Raikaria is, but I'm not adverse to bring the wagon to L-1 if it comes down to it.
