Pictures of Birds Mafia - Game Over

[NekoNekoRex]

I reject your opinions and instead ##Vote: Conq

[PX]

##Unvote
Vote NNR

Scum for wanting to prolong RVS.

[GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em]

(2) PX - Hero999, Serela
(2) Serela - Raikaria, I have no name
(1) Conqueror - NekoNekoRex
(1) NekoNekoRex - PX
(1) Shadoweh - Dormio
Not Voting (4): Affinity, Conqueror, Polaris, Shadoweh, Zakeri

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to hammer. You have about 48 hours left in the day.

[Shadoweh]

Rule addendum: the only roleplaying allowed in this game is replacing all your words with "chirp", "caw" or "squawk"

edit: or hoot i guess, i apologize to any owls who felt oppressed by this post

You should check your songbird privledge.

##Vote: Raikaria Bad waifu 1/10 would not marry again

[Raikaria]

You should check your songbird privledge.

##Vote: Raikaria Bad waifu 1/10 would not marry again

You're the female Shadoweh.

Of course I'm a bad waifu. I'm not a female.

[Polaris]

Is RVS still going on? Has it ended? I wanted to participate :ohdear:

I'm not particularly happy with PX for telling us to give a reason to vote someone other than Serela, while a reason is not necessary to vote Serela. I mean, it should be natural that we give a reason for any of our votes, including a vote on Serela, especially if/when RVS is over. Why should we be allowed to excuse ourselves from explaining a vote on Serela?

##Vote: PX

PX, would you personally vote Serela? Is the person who you are voting for (NNR) scummier than Serela?

Of course, I am naturally displeased with those who are taking this as an opportunity to vote Serela without good reason, i.e. Raikaria and IHNN.

[Raikaria]

Is RVS still going on? Has it ended? I wanted to participate :ohdear:

I'm not particularly happy with PX for telling us to give a reason to vote someone other than Serela, while a reason is not necessary to vote Serela. I mean, it should be natural that we give a reason for any of our votes, including a vote on Serela, especially if/when RVS is over. Why should we be allowed to excuse ourselves from explaining a vote on Serela?

##Vote: PX

PX, would you personally vote Serela? Is the person who you are voting for (NNR) scummier than Serela?

Of course, I am naturally displeased with those who are taking this as an opportunity to vote Serela without good reason, i.e. Raikaria and IHNN.

Just pointing out, my vote for Serela was before PX started his stuff. I just played along with the glorious leader thing because RVS.

[PX]

Vote Shadoweh

Not voting Serela because there's more scum trying to do nothing but RVS right now. I have no problems with Serela at all, I just want people to vote him instead of having a giant circle of votes that amount to nothing.

[PX]

It's more productive to have everyone vote one person than a giant circle of votes.

[NekoNekoRex]

Is RVS still going on? Has it ended? I wanted to participate :ohdear:

I'm not particularly happy with PX for telling us to give a reason to vote someone other than Serela, while a reason is not necessary to vote Serela. I mean, it should be natural that we give a reason for any of our votes, including a vote on Serela, especially if/when RVS is over. Why should we be allowed to excuse ourselves from explaining a vote on Serela?

##Vote: PX

PX, would you personally vote Serela? Is the person who you are voting for (NNR) scummier than Serela?

Of course, I am naturally displeased with those who are taking this as an opportunity to vote Serela without good reason, i.e. Raikaria and IHNN.

I kind of disagree with this post, the game just started, asking if X is scummier then Y isn't going to be easy to answer.

It

##Unvote
Vote NNR

Scum for wanting to prolong RVS.

It's barely been an hour...

[PX]

RVS lasts as long as players allow it to last. You explicitly ignored my post to do something that doesn't advance the game.

[Polaris]

I can't actually follow PX's reasoning that voting a single player is productive, especially when PX doesn't even find that single player scummy. I'm not sure if this is something town would do.

NNR: It's not a difficult question. There has to be a reason why you vote one person over another. Because PX was voting for you while asking others to vote Serela, I assumed he found both scummy and was asking for clarification. I suppose if you're not voting either person then it wouldn't be as easy to answer, but that isn't the case here.

[NekoNekoRex]

RVS lasts as long as players allow it to last. You explicitly ignored my post to do something that doesn't advance the game.

Encouraging a wagon on Serela right as the game starts doesn't do too much to advance it, either.

Actually, I guess it does, but it's counterproductive to town wincon to do so.

[I have no name]

I plunked down a vote to plunk one down.

Shadoweh what kind of reasoning is that, all I did was say you shouldn't vote Serela because I was voting Serela and I'm awful at reading Serela :3
##Vote: Shadoweh

-cut-
PX voting Shadoweh was totally my idea

I hit post and left to go have dinner but PX posted again so this has been sitting here for an hour >.>
So embarrassing.

-cut-
Polaris, it's PX, he does weird stuff and is (IMO) generally hard to read.

[WHMZakeri]

##Vote: Raikaria
How dare you say that about mai hasubando, Shadoweh

[Affinity]

The early bird (PX)... is probably not scum, no matter how one-winged he is, and I sympathize with his sense of initiative. 

Polaris trying to spin logic out of PX's jokey Serela posts sounds like easy pickings to me when they are so unrelated to his current votes.  It is distracting.

Competing bandwagons > logic at this point in the game.

##Vote: Shadoweh

Let's turn up the heat, baby.

[WHMZakeri]

##Vote: Shadoweh

-cut-
PX voting Shadoweh was totally my idea

So basically you and PX are the scumteam?
I claim Serial Killer/Survivor/Bulletproof/one-shot governor.

Tell me who your third scumteam member is so I don't accidentally shoot them overnight.

[I have no name]

So basically you and PX are the scumteam?
I claim Serial Killer/Survivor/Bulletproof/one-shot governor.

Tell me who your third scumteam member is so I don't accidentally shoot them overnight.

I didn't hit comma, what it should have been was: "PX, voting Shadoweh was my idea first"

The longer I leave a post just sitting there, the more confusing it is.

[WHMZakeri]

:<

[PX]

How is forcing people to take a side counterproductive? You trying to hide in RVS reasoning strengthens my scum read on you, so my vote stays here.

[Polaris]

^ PX you are voting Shadoweh right? Your post is confusing me.

[PX]

Awww dammit I forgot who I was voting lol

Vote NekoNekoRex

[Polaris]

PX why did you vote Shadoweh anyway? Why is anyone voting Shadoweh anyway?

Shadoweh what kind of reasoning is that, all I did was say you shouldn't vote Serela because I was voting Serela and I'm awful at reading Serela :3
##Vote: Shadoweh

This is confusing me too, because Shadoweh only has one post which has nothing to do with you?

Affinity is also weird for voting Shadoweh and setting up the bandwagon saying that "competing bandwagons > logic" except Shadoweh's so-called wagon isn't even competing with anything. It just exists, and for no reason.

I'm so lost.

[PX]

Because I was going to vote anyone who didn't vote Serela or provided a reason not to. Shadoweh did both of those.

[Affinity]

It's competing with PX's wagon, isn't it, in terms of numbers?  Choices between two viable wagons for the day are the best way to see where people stand (especially in the case where scum happens to be one of the two), since every vote matters.  That's the power of the vote.  Supposed logic errors (the likes that you point out) don't count for anything at this stage of the game since town can make them too.  We're birds, after all.

##Unvote
##Vote: Ralkaria

On a quick skim, I find it suspicious that Ralkaria's only jerk reaction to Polaris' post was to defend himself (when he wasn't even voted).  Everyone else had commented on the PX issue as raised by both Polaris and Serela, so his play strikes me as wait-and-see, the bread and butter of scum ethos. 

[Hero999]

##Unvote
##Vote Raikaria
Sheeting Affinity as well as emotions getting in the way, posting by iPad too hard.
Ignoring current ongoing topic because wifom to hell.
Affinity has the most reasonable post as of the moment.

[Polaris]

Well, I certainly can't see Shadoweh as a viable wagon, but I guess the "choosing between wagons" thing is similar to what PX is doing by "forcing people to take sides" or something like that. The problem I have with choosing sides is that it doesn't feel like there are any sides to choose from. Or something.

I'll stick with my PX vote for now since the earlier vote shenanigans make me feel like I can't dismiss the earlier posts as "jokey Serela posts".

I'm kind of convinced that Raikaria and his semi-reactiveness is a little scummy, but I think I find PX weirder.

[Shadoweh]

Hah hah hah what was that, four votes? I've slept through bigger wagons then you birds can flap out.

PX: Why would I have voted for Serela?
Hero: 'emotions getting in the way'? What the hell does that mean?
Affinity: You're voting Raikaria over Polaaris's post, but you were suspecting Polaris over that very same post, how does that work out?

Shadoweh what kind of reasoning is that, all I did was say you shouldn't vote Serela because I was voting Serela and I'm awful at reading Serela :3
##Vote: Shadoweh

What are you replying to? I didn't say anything about Serela, or about your post. Why are you defending PX for no reason, he hasn't done anything. 'He's weird' is a bad reason to defend someone anyways.

##Unvote
##Vote: Ihavenoname

[I have no name]

I'm taking that Raikaria post as survivalism which is a null-tell IMO, except for that this early there's no reason to and Raikaria is experienced enough to not make that mistake.  so it's weirdish I guess?

PX is being PX, I always read him as scum  :derp:

-cut-
Looking back even I can't make sense of that post Shadoweh.  That's why I should post things as I write them instead of looking over them a million times and not walk away with a post sitting there.

[NekoNekoRex]

How is forcing people to take a side counterproductive? You trying to hide in RVS reasoning strengthens my scum read on you, so my vote stays here.

You're forcing the players to take a side on a player who has done fuck-all this game so far.

I felt entitled to one silly post at the start of the game, as should everyone. That isn't exactly a heinous crime in my books, or worth voting for that matter. I'm not prolonging RVS as much as you're essentially forcing it to end anyway.