@Omba: No content is better than bad content, and with Dan's being effectively absent for more than 24 hours now if I'm not mistaken, I guess I'll prefer Dan's lynch at the moment to Serela's. There's also the issue where Dorian seems to be defending Dan indirectly by voting capt.h, and though I don't think it's that bad on its own, Dan's flip might shed some light on it.
I feel a miasma of laziness drawing down upon town, and that most of the energy present is still focused on the box, which I have already said that I would keep until near the deadline.
Not sure about the Dorian case in general, it's interesting how he gets charged for 'mudslinging' and stuff in his interesting case against capt.h when all Conq has to do is to change his vote onto some politically correct wagon with terse, incomplete reasoning. I don't believe the proponents of that case has addressed the hypocrisy aspect of Dorian's case on capt.h's vote for Dan, which has an element of truth to it. While I suppose that Dorian's ignorance of everyone else other than his target is irksome for the usual reasons, I don't think he's scum.
Reading capt.h as prompted by Dorian, there seems to be a few blind spots in his distinction between the loud and quiet. It's quite baffling why he singles out Chaore and Bob for not being centre stage and not Conq, LLD, and other related people who are arguably as quiet, if not quieter, at the moment. Would like an explanation for his selectiveness.
As I said above, Conq looks worse for that vote jump. His private 'town reads', one of which (on BT) came out of nowhere in his justification as to why Dorian over BT, and his myriad questions on others which I don't see him using the answers to, just adds to that murkiness around his thought processes in general, and that's pretty scummy.