Let's go one more time Dormio since you are like missing something.
So first of all, you're going on about the blank unvote. I did that because I thought that Shadoweh was at L-1, and I did not want her to stay there when she had barely even had a chance to post. I did not say much else in that post because I was busy at the time, and could not actually say much else.
Fine.
May I inquire so as to how Shadoweh cleared up her out of place satire to you? Because, you know, with the way you worded that, it kind of sounds like the reason it got better to you was because something that you could see as being scummier came along.
You may.
Her post:
Maybe they did! I don't even remember if he posted before I said the first quote!
The first was a joke about how Schezo is always scum. The second was a statement based on actual game talk. Strange how that works.
Clarified the fact that she just dropped a scum read on me, which I thought was serious. It wasn't and her post here clarified that as such.
Yes, I expressed dislike of PX, but I did not think that it was worth a vote at the time. You ask Conq not to vote for you based on playstyle or whatever, yet you'll do the same to me?
Please don't twist what I say. You could have put in your unvote, don't want it at L-1 but you have later clarified it. So at that moment in time you expressed suspicion of Shadoweh and then PX
here. You come back,
don't clarify that it was an unvote for L-1 thing,
don't clarify that she's still who you want to vote and instead make a remark on PX that you dislike him. Couple that with your point that means nothing but filler with Shadoweh.
You know why I have a problem with this? I don't know where you want to go at this point.
Do you want to get Shadoweh who you had a vote on or PX who you dislike? That's a problem in my ability to read you. That is why I made a big deal out of it and I would appreciate if you back up out my face for that.
What trapping? You have only yourself to blame for making a statement which suggested that I should place my vote somewhere of your choosing.
Again, no I don't have just myself to blame for YOUR inability to vote someone who you had suspicion on or at the very least express willingness to vote after dropping that PX comment. Your comment to Shadoweh in this post didn't imply or state you would vote her yet at the same time you dislike PX. Get it now? I was asking if you were going to vote PX since you did dislike him and didn't express that at Shadoweh.
JOB defending me is a thing I dislike, as is all the sheeping and insistence on using bad logic. Unfortunately, town!JOB loves sheeping and the like, so ugh.
I will not let you clear someone on meta, have you seen all his recent actions?
Your last three lines might as well not even be here if all you're going to say is: "X is interesting they should post. I found this interesting."
Interesting how? Elaborate instead of making fake content.
Action Dan:
The Dormio/Schezo fight is a goldmine. It solidifies for me a town read of Dormio while I remain unconvinced of Schezo's attacks upon Dormio.
If this is such a gold mine, would you mind elaborating with examples where you get town vibes from Dormio?
I think JOB is both a hell of a lot more town and that JOB is also a greater ASSET at the moment.
Then I would like to ask you to look at Job's actions and explain to me how you're getting a town read from all of this bad logic and sheeping.
Conqueror's 90:
No, I didn't vote you for asking questions; that would be silly. Let me point you to an example of what I was voting you for.
This was in response to Dormio not voting PX like you asked him to and voting you instead. It felt like an incredibly defensive overreaction, sorta like this one. Add to that the previous post, which felt unnecessarily aggressive. Forgive me if I thought you were trying to piss people off instead of clearing things up. Tone is important, yo.
I think I just explained this earlier in my post. If that isn't the answer you're looking for please say so.
You can't be serious. JOB's reasoning in that line does make me :psyduck: as well, but this is more a player tell than anything. Why are you twisting it to paint him as definite scum?
I disagree about being able to use that as a player tell for someone who has pushed bad logic not just a few but all day. Really, have read my case on him? Like, is this the only problem you have with me out of the multitude of other points I made on him earlier? Why is it OMGUS instead of bad scum pushing bad logic? I'm not seeing it.
I will have to update my JOB read in another post because fuck.
Conq is right in his point that JOB borrowed his post because as soon as Conq mentioned Job could be cleared with his player tell, JOB immediately latches onto this and says the same thing in his next post.
That's a player tell. I'm not the best mafia player you know.
