Oh my, I should have known the illiterate one who's against early voting would jump on the idiot wagon. Fool.
Either way, the fundamental misunderstanding seems to be I'm attacking Stone solely on bad play. This is not the case, and anyone with the intelligence required to read and understand my wonderful posts would know that. Of course, I'm surrounded by incompetents, a lot of them suspiciously on my wagon. At this point we might want to look towards that wagon to find scum, at some point. Perhaps it is still yet early though.
At any rate, the thing is, Stone's "bad play" is done with scummy intent, as I explained. You all have chosen to misrepresent that as being a pure accusation of bad play. Granted, I can't expect morons to make the distinction so easily, but thankfully, you have me around to explain it.
Further, what you call fluff appears to be mafia theory that has a sounder basis than most of the posts this game. I can't expect someone as illiterate as you to get that though. Alas, I wish I knew words small enough to get my point across, but, as you say, that'd probably take a "fukken miracle".
Since apparently the length of my posts are irritating to some of you, allow me to utilize a function known as "tl;dr" in the vain hope that something clicks in your sluggish minds.
tl;dr: I'm voting Stone based on scummy intent. While a component of that is bad play, it's bad play that gives a clear advantage to scum if allowed to pass unmolested. Everyone voting me don't have a leg to stand on, but I'm interested to see where this information will lead.
Actually, let's try something. Could anyone voting me explain your vote? Use as many words as needed :3c.
Ah, it appears there has been a ninja or three.
@Roddy: While decency should apply, I believe it is also common decency to at least try to think when you are playing a game that requires thinking. Anyone I have called a moron has violated such rules of ettiquette by trying to pass off their terrible posts as thinking. Honestly, I've been rather "good", so to speak, dealing with those of inferior intelligence. Regardless, it is not in my interests to get in a fight over this. I will...attempt to overlook these egregious violations against the principles of thought in the future. Do you accept this?
The rest of your post is solid, and I will accept the onus on me to explain why the mason situation is scummy. It's a weak rolefish, that, when denied or confirmed (highly unlikely to see the latter), allows scum to have a better sorting algorithm for their kill. Masons are one of the most powerful roles around, and as such as good to try to out if they exist. However, that's not the crux of my argument against Steven. It's the fact he's attempting to railroad the situation into an obvious relationship between me and Stone Mason. This benefits scum in that it perpetuates a thought process likely to lead to mislynch if the neighbor/mason probability is eliminated. Given the sheeping that's occurred this game, I lack confidence in the abilities of my fellow townies to discern the logic trap. I think Stone realizes this as well.
You're observations on Saki worry me, and they bear bearing out. I was blinded by the fact she did seem to make sense in agreeing on Stone, but the fact her votes fail to reflect this attitude is...not good. I want a reply from those on my wagon to the earlier question posed, first though.
Ah, more ninjas:
@ John: I have explained this several times, and even within this post. It is well explained in all of my posting since the vote. This heavily implies you aren't reading my posts so much as voting me because it's "too hard" to really comprehend them. I also would invite you to consider that new does not necessarily mean that someone is always town. But I disagree he's making noob mistakes, so it's a moot point.
Your accusations are, quite frankly, unfounded. But I'm glad you clarified them. I urge you to think critically of what you've accused me of and reread my posts. Try to discern my intent. I'm sure you will find it far from that of a "terrorist" as you call it.
@Roddy: I like you
.
