Author Topic: Welcome to the NHK!! Mafia (Night Three) (Read 57627 times)

Schezo · « **Reply #150 on:** July 18, 2012, 01:48:15 AM »

mmmm that's it? No flavor or anything. Do you appear guilty to cops and innocent to trackers. Like, claim.

PX · « **Reply #151 on:** July 18, 2012, 01:48:55 AM »

It's quite standard for millers to claim their first post and to post all details of their role.

NekoNekoRex · « **Reply #152 on:** July 18, 2012, 01:53:43 AM »

Quote

Your Schezo vote is hilarious, and everything else you've done amounts to nothing.

I just noticed this was directed at me

Screw you guys. If I'm scum for not being online 5 hours earlier and having *~master participation~* then this game isn't going to be worth playing after I go to sleep because I'm just going to come to 3 more pages of bullshit and I'm going to be a target for not being in it then I'm not going to bother playing at all.

Because you people are so desperate, I'm Akira Jougasaki, Town Miller. I'm an art teacher.
I'm a miller because my brash advice and busy schedule makes people suspicious of me. Cop investigations on me turn up Guilty.

Happy now?

ActionDan · « **Reply #153 on:** July 18, 2012, 02:23:51 AM »

OKay I'm here but WTF is going on with the avatars? every time I refresh they're changing anywhere from Eiki to a burning trash can

Edible · « **Reply #154 on:** July 18, 2012, 02:31:20 AM »

Quote from: ActionDan on July 18, 2012, 02:23:51 AM

OKay I'm here but WTF is going on with the avatars? every time I refresh they're changing anywhere from Eiki to a burning trash can

Happy birthday, TSO! :3c

GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em · « **Reply #155 on:** July 18, 2012, 02:36:12 AM »

what the fuck is this shit

GMOFucker: Makin' GMOs To Fuck 'Em · « **Reply #156 on:** July 18, 2012, 02:36:45 AM »

and then edible was kiro

this is suddenly more intriguing than the identities of the scum!

Dr Rawr · « **Reply #157 on:** July 18, 2012, 02:37:55 AM »

sonata whar

##vote: px

craaaaaaaaazy thing going on with dat miller claim

Serela · « **Reply #158 on:** July 18, 2012, 02:39:38 AM »

AAAAA AVATARS (I didn't realize it was changing every time at first, because I was Serela Milfall when I came back, and that seemed like something anyone here would have given me)

Schezo:~*~Three~*~ people, not two D:

Also this is adorable.

Dr Rawr · « **Reply #159 on:** July 18, 2012, 02:44:00 AM »

i went back to read what was going on and schezo had px avatar and px had schezo avatar and then and then and then i got all confused but im pretty sure i got it right

Schezo · « **Reply #160 on:** July 18, 2012, 02:45:13 AM »

Serela who is the 3rd?

Neko that's not even what my case on you boils down to but sure you can call it that.

I'm done for the night.

ActionDan · « **Reply #161 on:** July 18, 2012, 03:09:37 AM »

haha, Edible got LLD's avatar :V.

Um. I'm gonna get some food and see if this settles down.

But it's so fun refreshing!

PX · « **Reply #162 on:** July 18, 2012, 03:42:28 AM »

I propose we suspend the game until the avatar shenanigans end?

Serela · « **Reply #163 on:** July 18, 2012, 03:50:54 AM »

Quote from: Amae Koromo on July 18, 2012, 03:42:28 AM

I propose we suspend the game until the avatar shenanigans end?

I have to admit, as awesome as the shenanigans are, it's really hard to reread when PX just got Kefit's avatar and etc.

Affinity · « **Reply #164 on:** July 18, 2012, 03:52:18 AM »

Welcome to the Conspiracy

ActionDan: Bardiche, Dormio (2)
Bardiche: ActionDan, BT, Edible, Schezo (4)
BT: Shadoweh, Omba (2)
Dormio: (0)
Dr. Rawr: (0)
Edible: (0)
huhwhat: (0)
NekoNekoRex: PX (1)
Omba: (0)
PX: NeoSerela, dr rawr (2)
Schezo: NekoNekoRex (1)
Serela: (0)
Shadoweh: huhwhat (1)

Bardiche is at L-3

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.
I have granted a tentative two hour extension for the passing entertainment. If everyone is still in mental paralysis by then I guess I might suspend the game. >_>
You have 36 hours remaining~.

Omba · « **Reply #165 on:** July 18, 2012, 03:52:56 AM »

I'd rather just get an extension of a few hours. And it's not like you can't just read people's names. Some hours of extension should make up for the added effort, I'd think. (Also because otherwise I'd have to wait before the game continues). :V

--cut by Affinity doing just that

PX · « **Reply #166 on:** July 18, 2012, 03:53:48 AM »

I guess that works too

Omba · « **Reply #167 on:** July 18, 2012, 04:00:32 AM »

Also Edible there's a flaw in your most recent Bard case that you might want to catch before Bard comes raining down on you with fire and brimstone.

Edible · « **Reply #168 on:** July 18, 2012, 04:12:36 AM »

Quote from: Omba on July 18, 2012, 04:00:32 AM

Also Edible there's a flaw in your most recent Bard case that you might want to catch before Bard comes raining down on you with fire and brimstone.

Thanks for the tip! I'll file it under my "meaningless sideline observations" folder, which also seems to contain most of your posts today. How odd.

I have no name · « **Reply #169 on:** July 18, 2012, 04:16:44 AM »

Automated Votecount 3: Now with more wagons!
ActionDan: Bardiche, Dormio (2)
Bardiche: ActionDan, BT, Edible, Schezo (4)
BT: Shadoweh, Omba (2)
Dormio: (0)
Dr. Rawr: (0)
Edible: (0)
huhwhat: (0)
NekoNekoRex: PX (1)
Omba: (0)
PX: Serela, Dr. Rawr (2)
Schezo: NekoNekoRex (1)
Serela: (0)
Shadoweh: huhwhat (1)

With 13 alive, it's 7 to lynch.
You have 33 hours remaining.

Omba · « **Reply #170 on:** July 18, 2012, 04:22:04 AM »

Refusal to recheck your case noted.

Okay, then in more plain words: Your case requires assuming that a) No town player other than maybe Bard would do this (which is a stretch) and b) completely ignores a certain recent game that just may have an influence on how he reacts this game. Or in short, it's pretty obvious that he'd flip out at the first sign of :shenanigans: after the way town tripped over itself last time, particularly if those shenanigans involve someone basically claiming scum. Yes, Mason Miller is a scum claim.
Seriously, making a pygmalion case on Bard of all people.

Dormio Ergo Sum · « **Reply #171 on:** July 18, 2012, 06:02:33 AM »

On a short break at uni.
Dislike ActionDan's refusal to do anything.
We all know that TSO played with random variables to mix up people's avatars. I don't think that this excuses you from making a post during the four or so hours you were active.

Would like to see BT Re: Bardiche.

Honestly, I don't see Edible's case on Bardiche. I also don't understand how Bardiche is a leading wagon at this point.

BT · « **Reply #172 on:** July 18, 2012, 06:31:28 AM »

Omba, you've had your fun. We're long officially in D1 and you got to comment on other things. You're still voting me for :gut:.

Quote from: Omba on July 18, 2012, 12:42:11 AM

Bardiche & Shadoweh: Strong townreads, so the wagons are inherently shit.

:colonveeplusalpha:

Re: Dormio [and, uh, Bard]: He was voting Dan for a nonexistant scum claim. On you he actually had something, and that something was odd. The reason for what I did that can be seen as "defending Dan" was explained already.

Quote from: BT on July 17, 2012, 04:15:14 PM

No reason for a wagon to form from something as silly as that, would dissolve fast and mostly act as :noise: to benefit scum. I was stopping it before it began.

Your questions are all answered here.

Quote from: Shadoweh on July 17, 2012, 10:23:08 PM

BT: I'm pretty damn ridiculous. So who's scum?

I would have jerkvoted you for the passiveness if you weren't always like that (-_____-) and uh there's my vote that portrays who I suspect I think that's usually what votes do yeah

Going to try and dechiper these last two pages of null when I should be studying for tests, fun.

Dormio Ergo Sum · « **Reply #173 on:** July 18, 2012, 06:34:32 AM »

But the thing is, my dear BT, that you're the only one asserting that.
When I looked through Bardiche's posts, I found mention of suspicion of ActionDan for also extending the RVS.
You failed to mention this at all and instead went into a back and forth with Bardiche based on how he claimed I was extending the RVS.
Does this change your opinion in any way, or do you believe it to be a moot point?

BT · « **Reply #174 on:** July 18, 2012, 06:44:10 AM »

I'm pretty sure it was agreed on somewhere in page 3 that "pro-scum nonserious posts ha" isn't scummy alone. On Dan he had the claim shens which is a silly point and on you he had the whole appealing to Edible thing, which is actually meaningful. In fact, I should be wondering why he didn't vote you off the bat instead of clinging to Dan's could-be-seen-and-totally-is-a-scum-claim.

Omba · « **Reply #175 on:** July 18, 2012, 06:51:29 AM »

Uh, BT. You're still doing that thing where you're voting Bard. The idea that he just might have been doing the policy lynch scum claims thing there didn't cross your mind?

BT · « **Reply #176 on:** July 18, 2012, 07:01:10 AM »

What is the motivation behind voting someone for claiming scum when it isn't generally agreed on that that person claimed scum? Aside from an easy vote.

BT · « **Reply #177 on:** July 18, 2012, 07:02:41 AM »

Quote from: BT on July 18, 2012, 06:31:28 AM

Omba, you've had your fun. We're long officially in D1 and you got to comment on other things. You're still voting me for :gut:.

Omba · « **Reply #178 on:** July 18, 2012, 07:07:28 AM »

I'm perfectly content with helping you hang yourself, thank you.

And again, yes, Mason Miller is the equivalent of a scum claim. The motivation behind lynching that should be pretty obvious after we had two scum merrily dancing through the thread singing "we're scum masons and you won't lynch us".

Omba · « **Reply #179 on:** July 18, 2012, 07:20:03 AM »

Shadoweh I know you're in front of a computer. Get your ass in here and help me lynch BT.