@ Pesco: Reasonable enough. I'm going to drop the complaints I had about you irking me because they were pretty illogical after thinking it over again. For now, anyway. ALSO PLEASE DON'T HAMMER, I'M ADDING THIS SENTANCEIN AT THE LAST MINUTE BECAUSE ARGH
@ reV: 2 scum, 1 SK and 9 townies seems pretty reasonable to me (see PoS), and was actually what I was assuming. I'm not sure why you're so confident PX is town. Regardless, whether or not a SK was alive is aside the point, the point being that Chaore wouldn't have said town was in LYLO if there were 3 scum alive before I revived. The game would have already been called.
Sooo, other people. I'm think reVelske is likely town at this point, and the wagon growing on him rubs me the wrong way because of this. His gambit to keep me alive does seem to have town intent at least, and the way he went about it makes it appear as if he was actually a townie withholding role information to keep another player alive rather than scum faking a gambit to get townie cred. This is mainly because I believe him being transparent about the gambit rather than actually claiming he used his doc N1 and lying has townie motivation due to LaL, etc. His confusion-waffle between Schezo and Pesco reads as sincere to me as well, hence why I was thinking that he is confused town. I don't believe scum would have made up that thought process for the Schezo jump, it likely would have read odd and drawn attention.
I would also be suspicious of K4U if Zak died and flipped scum, as her arguments with Zak have felt forced to me and the way she has consistently jumped on Kips seems in line with my earlier theory about Zak trying to push kips' lynch to a later point in the game. It also seems like Zak was attempting to set up a bus on her if kips flipped, notably due to how he starts ignoring her when D2 pulls around and never even seemed to push her that much in the first place beyond his initial post D1. Little conviction, etc.
The same goes for when he pressed K4U earlier today over a misrep about her tunneling Kips that he should have actually known was false (K4U herself pointed this out), which leads to K4U making a post consisting entirely of attacking Zak over his case... before swerving over to reV and voting him for little more than what had already been already been stated, which is rather confusing to me. Were it not for the ##s, I would think that she was going after Zak in that post. She certainly had more reasons to target Zak than she had to target reV, after Zak had just pushed an awkward case bordering on misrep that even K4U said was "one of the weirdest cases (she) had ever read". It does not help that Zakeri was seeming to be the most likely lynch target and that point in the day, and the reV also seemed like the best alternative to him as well.
I know that none of this holds up at all if Zak is town, but seeing as I derped up reV's gambit it seems unlikely I'll be around to say anything after we get a Zak flip (whenever that is). I'm just getting this out now in case Zak really does turn up scum.
One million ninjas argh.
