If I remember correctly, SD, you asked for a replacement during LyLO and left town to die due to 'emotional pressure', which kind of voids any kind of credibility you might have on commenting this game.
ReVelske, lying... I suppose, is pretty much a fundumental part of Mafia, no matter what your principles might tell you. You are free to play the game with whatever handicaps you impose on yourself, but the thing is that you cannot blame anyone else or rage about how everyone else isn't believing you... since the majority believe that lying is a fundamental part of the game, especially as scum, and mafia is all about the majority.
And K4U was pretty much 'active lurking' in a game where pretty much everyone was giving their all; she certainly wasn't that hard to implicate.
As for my way being the best 'objective' way to play scum, no, it certainly is not. There is the vested interest of keeping your scumbuddies alive as scum, which is the fundamental objective reason for the differences in the content of scum and town in a game with investigative/vig roles; e.g if FFMaster decided to investigate me earlier in JK9, I would have been toast; I did not want Roukanken lynched, etc. Scum can certainly pretend to be pro-town for a brief amount of time, but they can't be pro-town forever because they would be playing poker with the cops and the trackers if they push for their buddies' lynches without sophistication, which is what I did during JK9. The aim of town is to spot this sophistication in a convincing way; which has been done in past games (FAV's greatest moment in WTC Mafia, etc.). There's nothing wrong with using a little meta in your reasoning, but you must balance it with what is on the topic.