Going to have to agree that people shouldn't assume that the Hele wagon was scum-motivated, because he really WAS scummy and it was easy for town and scum alike to jump on his wagon.
About my vote... yeah, I'm stumped.
I still read Conq as scum but ~logic everywhere~ is making me doubt this read, especially stuff in HW's posts and the thing about townvstown D3, as that WOULD explain why the vote literally stuck at L-1vsL-1 for 48 hours. If we assume Town!Conq, scum would have no reason to change the course of the day, as two town wagons being the center affair is ideal. Of course, in the case of Scum!Conq, it's still logical that the attempt at lynching Zak as a consolidation vote was indeed a scum push, but that would imply a.. what? A Conq-Affinity scumteam? I don't find that likely in the slightest.
Now, if we keep with this assumption, (along the assumption that I, myself, am town, which is something I am going to be assuming!) we're left with two scum (and a third party?) in Pesco, Affinity, Zak and Dormio. Affinity started an honest attempt at a quicklynch on Zak so I'm ruling out a Zak-Affinity scumteam. Pesco is interesting, because Scum!Pesco would mean a deliberate bus on PX from the very beginning of D2. Which isn't impossible because he was a simple goon and his slot was far from perfect. I'm sure I can come up with conclusions regarding Zak and Dormio but I simply can't think straight at the moment.
Bleh. I still think Dormio has the best chance of being scum, especially after last day's "I'm going to tunnel on Hele all day, also I might be starting to doubt my Conq read so look forward to that". If I don't have a clear pick yet, that's where my vote is going.
##Vote Dormio
Of course, I'm hoping that I will have a clear pick by tomorrow, once people (Conq, Dormio, Zak, maybe Shadoweh) show up with content (and results).