~Beyond the Border~ > Mystia's Stored Games
Gensokyo Worker's Facepalm Mafia - Topic 2, Game Over, Man, Game Over
WRATHIE_Beatrice:
hi!! I got my ava and sig back~~
yay! and this new forums is bad for the eyes man.
@pesco: I agree with the guys here, especially about the parts about not posting useful stuff and such.
But you're pesco, gambit player so I gave you a pass on that.
--- Quote ---Wrathie had my vote for his strange posting and ducking off without a vote down. He's still not communicating to us and there's no way I can believe in his sincerity like this. When I commented on Wrathie reacting strongly, it was about this post. If he was throwing a fit like that at L-1 or 2, fine. But he was only on 2 votes (L-5) at the time.
--- End quote ---
as many people has pointed out, i was out of character that day.. it was Real Life rearing it's head on me.
I can't find anything else asides from what you guys posted... but as he is still playing on setup subconsciously.. what with raising Lynchee and etc every other post when he is actually posting content, pesco is skirting around with the borders of speech.
I dislike it lots, ready for a pesco lynch.
--- Quote from: pesco47 on April 21, 2009, 09:52:23 AM ---You asked for where people acknowledged my content, I gave the links that were broken then fixed them. Affinity noted the callout to KY for not asking questions and UK noted my determination of Wrathie having ulterior motives for not voting.
--- End quote ---
i can't see the links now.. but no reason for me not to vote you thou.
I saw something about why was I able to post if my keyboard was busted.
Simple.
my ###### key was busted and i fixed it the next day.
Happy? Real life stuff so I can't give any proof ^^
--- Quote from: pesco47 on April 21, 2009, 08:25:10 AM ---Answering to Alice's 2 questions from the end of the last topic.
1) The initial pass was due to knowing your RL circumstances and that was null in determining you town. Your lurking at that time was insufficient to call scum and vote. The switch in my voting came after Edible's explanation post. It sounded reasonable enough to me then and that a SP lynch looked unlikely, I made my switch.
--- End quote ---
So my real life's not even valid there? but the rest of it checks out... a Lynch IS better than No lynch at Day 1.
At least till i re-read Rou, was there no post between yours and Edible's?...
smell a scum. ^^
--- Quote ---2) I didn't buy your doc claim. There was no doc in Kilga's last game (which I co-modded) and in my mod-fishing, I deemed it unlikely for there to be a doc at all in the game.
--- End quote ---
This is just stating past experience, i call it a gut vote then anything else.... which point comes first however?
##unvote
##vote pesco
My stand on this is that he's not posting as much as he can, and as it can only be on my pov, he's gunning me for a case that i know is weak and cannot be proved easily.
@Edible: ur post has more content now.. seems okay to me and straightforward... so nothing much to add on.
But Kiro brought up a good point on why did you unvote when it was after his claim, which i nearly skirted over due to his sob-party of sorts.
But your reply:
--- Quote from: Edible on April 21, 2009, 08:07:35 AM ---I was not aware I was required to be wholly convinced someone was scum to vote them, or wholly convinced someone was town to unvote them.
Providing a detailed answer here would probably prove insulting to donut. I will therefore say that it's my personal belief, based off donut's overall personality, that his actions this game make sense for someone with no power role. Thus, vanilla townie makes some sense. (This would probably also apply to mafia goon to a lesser extent, I suppose.)
Elaboration: I'm still okay with a donut lynch, especially if he doesn't come up with something worthwhile. Until then, my vote has better things to do than waste time on him.
--- End quote ---
seems okay to me.
A few questions thou. it's loosely based on meta, again... but it probably is a null tell on that since you are willing to vote on donut if it comes to it.
Was thinking i should point that out.
@Kiro: Pro-town as usual. If you end up scum, I'd have to blame myself again...
@rou: i gotta ask something before i do another analysis..
Is it Edible's Link or pesco's link that is broken. in my knowledge Edible's was broken but was pesco's??
Confused.
but you check out okay ^^
?q:
Oh wow... this is going to take some getting used to.
This is mostly a "hi I'm here" post. My stance on pesco has not changed. I'd like to look into wrathie and Edible (finally) when I get time; for now I need to catch up on homework. Sorry...
WRATHIE_Beatrice:
just a quick thought that I had.
From the two quotes in my previous post... Isn't Edible and pesco both clearing someone and scum hunting based on game set up?
and umu, i would appreciate that too ^^
Kilgamayan:
Let's Play Danmaku Detective Game! Vote Count:
Edible (0): wrathie, Affinity
pesco47 (5): Youmu, Youmu, Alice Margatroid, Roukanken, Edible, wrathie
Roukanken (0): nintendonut888
Alice Margatroid (0): Roukanken
wrathie (1): pesco47
nintendonut888 (5): Edible, Affinity, Youmu, Roukanken, Kanako Yasaka, Kiro, Nietz, UncertainKitten
Youmu (0): Roukanken
Not voting: nintendonut888
With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. You have ~15.5hours remaining.
Affinity:
wrathie's last post is very horrible, and jacks up my suspicion of him tenfold. Firstly, he threw away his entire case on Edible with a snap of a finger when one post ago, he was all accusationary towards Edible and unreasonably so, and all of a sudden he just gives it up based on 'more content' which isn't sufficiently elaborated upon. I don't view this in a very warm light. Also, there is a fair number of selective quoting, especially the bewildering taking of Kiro's question and Edible's reply and deeming it to be 'okay to him' without any other reasons seems to be useless and trying to 'seem' like scumhunting.
---
I don't really like the case against him; none of the points against donut are particularly hard to see and Rou's accusation of him is actually a null tell due to the fact that it's all a matter of sequence regarding 'original points'. The lynchee-lyncher argument is no better nor worse than Rou's blind accusation of Alice in day two, and should not be factored against him. pesco's reactions however, strike me as very egocentric; all instances of which are already pointed out above. Also, the fact that he has been defending himself all day without attempting to continue his case on wrathie or even evluate his posts more than balances out the shortcomings of the case against him.
Would like a claim.
##Unvote
##Vote: pesco47