Fate is a pretty hard thing to grasp, discuss, and overall think about, isn't it?
So with this whole idea that Remilia changes which of the many alternate Gensokyos are the main focus...
We can assume that this means each Gensokyo has its own predestined fate, considering how each one is at least slightly different.
Therefore, this would mean Remilia doesn't actually control fate. Rather, she simply chooses a pre-existing, alternative Gensokyo and thus a pre-existing, alternative timeline.
And you're saying Remilia wouldn't actually go anywhere? If say, she tried to prevent herself from dying somehow by changing fate, she would still die, right? We just wouldn't see it, but rather an alternate Gensokyo in which she lives.
If each Remilia in every Gensokyo controls fate, there would be at least a near-infinite number of times the "camera" changes, totally obliterating any sense of what's going on. One moment, we see Remilia. The next, we see a giant metropolis because way back when an alternate Remilia decided to do something that ultimately led up to a kappa takeover.
Unless there's also an unlimited amount of "cameras," each following its own timeline. For example, Remilia A changes fate. Camera A moves to Gensokyo B. Remilia B changes fate. Camera A moves to Gensokyo C. Camera B is elsewhere, doing its own thing. That would work too.
Anyway, I see it in a two ways.
First of all, Remilia cannot manipulate the laws of nature, so she can't "predestine" a falling vase to suddenly fly up into the ceiling. Makes sense, at least to me.
So this pretty much means:
- Remilia has the ability to control coincidences. To an extent.
- Or Remilia has the ability to manipulate the probability of something happening. To an extent.
Still, both are pretty similar.
I am quite sure I probably made no sense, and I am quite sure I'm really tired to boot.
Also, I am quite sure I'm not paying attention to the new replies that keep popping up, so some of my statements may be null or something.