Reread complete: Here's an Analysis in Mod presented Order:
All of Jam's posts worth looking at for day one are about how much Edible should be lynched. Especially Ironic was post 125, where Jam calls out Edible of Tunneling on Bard.
Post 280 scares me, since it implies I'm her scumpartner. She admits that most of her prods on edible were made because it was easy to poke him, and even easier to ignore me. Her excuse for not re-evicting was to prevent a misinformed wagonshifting, which I'm surprised no one has called out as preventing my lynch yet. I should be grateful but this is really making me paranoid.
The unevict happened after I first made my case on Neitz as well. Did you take that into consideration when you made your unevict back then?
I kind of assumed people could infer that I had suspicions on Zak as I also stated I'd like to see him post.
This doesn't really work, since you never said anything directly about me until hopefully your next post after mine (Voting me for "Reasons that don't need to be restated" isn't anything direct either)
The jump from Edible to me today is just basic bandwagon hopping at it's finest.
Kefit: I'd like to Ask Pesco, MSB, and anyone else who is giving Kefit a pass for today why they're so comfortable just handing it out to him? He's only made two posts this game, as far as I can recall. I know I've given passes to people only posting once a phase, but bofh usually offers analysis on more than two people a day.
Pesco: Being unhelpful is sort of Pesco's defining character trait (which ironically is why Pesco is so unhelpful) So I give some lax on waiting for my response so eagerly, since he was only of several people who did the same.
From post 97 - 180, Pesco's attention turns to poking and prodding Sakana's poor decisions. People seem to be sidestepping this issue, since everyone is happy with playing the newbie card for Sakana, but we do realize all of the mistakes that were made, and Pesco seemed much more interesting in the "Teach but not punish" approach, which I don't think is something Pesco would follow so politely. Rou's point about the separate but equal(ly bad) cases on Kilga being suspicious is what really ties this together, though.
I think knowing Pesco's flip would give us quite a bit of insight into whether we should be pampering Sakana or not.
Edible: The last half of day one is just you digging a 2x6x6 ft hole in the ground. It's hard to forgive in 134 where you backpedal on your Opportunistic claim on me and Jam. You really should have taken that point and run with it, especially since it seems true for Jam. Your tag onto the Neitz wagon also pretty halfhearted, as when you do you say he was the "Worst person on your wagon" as you "Mentioned before". The only time I remember you mentioning it before was in
this post where you actively discard it over your vote on Bard that you had "no reason to switch from"
The only notable thing I've seen from you on day 2 besides the post just above is the cheerleading on Pesco post you made after Rou's Omniopinion.
Since quantifying my desire for bloodspill prevents people from rapping on me for not taking responsibility for opinions I posted, and cases I made and pushed and am now trying to own up to, I'll go ahead and post a list in order from first to last in terms of vote options:
1. Pesco
2. Jam
3. Edible
4. Kefit
(Note: The reason Sakana is not on this list is because I'd rather go through Pesco first)
