Author Topic: Himelander Mafia Thread (Over! Scum Win!)  (Read 58539 times)

Kiro

  • Drinks: Everything
  • Sleeps: Anywhere
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #390 on: February 18, 2010, 12:37:43 PM »
Timing sucked so that I missed the rest of the pre-challenge discussion although I would have had no problems with the Kefit v. Ciato duel. See bottom of post.

Disagree with some of Serp's reasoning at the beginning of Day 3. I'm of the camp saying we shouldn't go methodically in order to eliminate Town heads. Eliminate likely Scum heads as a priority as it seems to be working for us right now. Also, you referring to Kilga suggesting the Alex v. Ciato fight as further justification for having it go is unusual since you're smart enough to not tout the "trust dead Townie's advice" even after Alex himself suggested it probably wasn't as good of an idea.

If Ciato flips Scum, my first impression is that I don't think Bard is Scum with her. Ciato's vote for Pesco's survival came really late and only brought it up to 5 versus 7 for Bardiche's survival. In essence, why would both Tom and possible ScumCiato both try to indirectly bus a ScumbuddyBard on Day 1? Optimistically, this would suggest Scum did not get a head on Day 1.

So, as far as I understand K4U's ability, it gives the victory to the hammerer of a regular Mafia day rather than the winner of a unilateral duel... I can't tell if that is more beneficial to Town or Scum because it is announced in advance. It however would cause more chaos because rather than worrying about Scum being between 2 duelists, you have to worry about the hammerer being any of "x" number of living Scum. Although that would expose Scum so I think overall it's a really good thing for Town as it reestablishes normalcy as long as we don't use it near endgame where Scum have greater proportionate voting power.

UK: I'm not sure how the standard of content is making me look scummy in your eyes. I gave an opinion on Pesco versus Bard. I also gave one that is for the mess of yesterday and today. And now that we have confirmed at least 1 dead Scum, I can make more connections based off of that as shown above. Bard and Alex look good (if Ciato also flips Scum), Cid I'm still ok on because if he gets a kill, he will not really be expected to get another one once he unveils his ability if it really helps Town that much. Also if he's some super Scum role rather than Super Town role, he never had to reveal it since he's been on the shortlist of those who look safe to initiate challenges; he could have been nominated and nobody would know he was prepping something big. Out of everyone else, Serp's logic today all seem to be able to give Scum a chance to bag heads and I don't like it. Lessly, Chaos has been cheerleading and Jam and Alice are almost identical in lurkerifics so my opinion on them is fluid but my next choices. Rou is not triggering warnings for me. As for you UK, I'm surprised you want to beat my supposed guilt to death. I can tell your intent is serious as hell so there's almost nothing I myself can say to change that opinion and it doesn't fit my Townie impression of you to tunnel that hard. I also don't think you as either alignment would challenge me directly at this stage so I don't see how you hanging onto this is beneficial to general discussion. In other words, I don't get you.

And Kefit's 1) in post #369 makes the most sense to me. Dunno about the Bard v. Alex fight for Day 4 because not only does it pit people with 1 win against each other, they're the 2 people I would believe the most to be Town in a ScumCiato flip. That pretty much covers my thoughts on today's challenge so:

##Vote Kefit for survival

Serp

  • It's all about overwhelming force and irresistible style
  • And in a pinch, style can slide
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #391 on: February 18, 2010, 02:31:17 PM »
Also, you referring to Kilga suggesting the Alex v. Ciato fight as further justification for having it go is unusual since you're smart enough to not tout the "trust dead Townie's advice" even after Alex himself suggested it probably wasn't as good of an idea.

I wasn't pointing to Kilga's endorsement as a sign that we should take that strategy.  I was directly responding to UK's accusation that holding to that strategy looked scummy.  If Kilga thought that it was a good idea, and he was town, I don't see how my holding to that idea could possibly look scummy, even if you don't agree with it.

Quote from: Kiro
If Ciato flips Scum, my first impression is that I don't think Bard is Scum with her. Ciato's vote for Pesco's survival came really late and only brought it up to 5 versus 7 for Bardiche's survival. In essence, why would both Tom and possible ScumCiato both try to indirectly bus a ScumbuddyBard on Day 1? Optimistically, this would suggest Scum did not get a head on Day 1.

I don't follow your reasoning here.  Bardiche was the favored one to live from the moment the challenge was made.  The only reason he didn't have more votes at that time was that no one wanted to bring him to L-1 and give Pesco the opportunity to hammer.  Placing a vote on Pesco so late is an empty gesture that could easily be just distancing oneself from a scumbuddy.

Kefit, there's also a gigantic hole in your reasoning:

Quote from: Kefit
If my analysis is correct, then in the worst case scenarios I am scum, Alex is scum, Bard is scum, and Tom is scum (and dead). None of us will ever win a challenge again. Yet only three heads will have been claimed (Pesco, Kilga, and Ciato). Thus, barring unknown roles and powers, the scum would only be able to win if either you let one person win multiple duels after this point, or there are more then five scum.

If all four of you were scum, then you wouldn't need to win anymore challenges to win the game.  All you'd need to do would be to stage a few town v. town duels.  You'd just need to get at least two scum to survive through LyLo (and one more scum for every person you named that's actually town).  Scum would clean up the remaining heads, whether or not they're "neutralized."  If we leave you all alive to LyLo, we're basically putting our faith in you to be town.

Are you people seeing why I favor having victorious players kill each other off, now?  The only neutralized scum is either a dead one with no kills, or a live one with no kills.

Putting a crazy strategy out there to have some holes poked in it is one thing, but I have a really hard time believing that Kiro's reasoning would be so bad as to let this point pass as town, especially while simultaneously claiming that my plan is too dangerous.  Whether or not he's scum with Kefit, I'm pegging Kiro as  likely scum with a path to the endgame mapped out.  Given a choice, I'd like to clean up the loose ends before dealing with him, but I should state for the record that if Kiro were to take on any of the unchallenged players right now, I'd be voting for his opponent.

Now, all that said, Ciato is still likely scum with a victory under her belt, and even if Kefit's scum, I doubt that he'd jeopardize himself by putting his life on the line with a challenge against a townie.  There's the fact that he's said that he wants to live to LyLo regardless of Ciato's flip, but in the end I'm more comfortable erring on the side of the player with less kills.

##Vote: Kefit
[15:13] <Sana> >:<

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #392 on: February 18, 2010, 04:05:46 PM »
Quote
UK: I'm not sure how the standard of content is making me look scummy in your eyes. I gave an opinion on Pesco versus Bard. I also gave one that is for the mess of yesterday and today. And now that we have confirmed at least 1 dead Scum, I can make more connections based off of that as shown above. Bard and Alex look good (if Ciato also flips Scum), Cid I'm still ok on because if he gets a kill, he will not really be expected to get another one once he unveils his ability if it really helps Town that much. Also if he's some super Scum role rather than Super Town role, he never had to reveal it since he's been on the shortlist of those who look safe to initiate challenges; he could have been nominated and nobody would know he was prepping something big. Out of everyone else, Serp's logic today all seem to be able to give Scum a chance to bag heads and I don't like it. Lessly, Chaos has been cheerleading and Jam and Alice are almost identical in lurkerifics so my opinion on them is fluid but my next choices. Rou is not triggering warnings for me. As for you UK, I'm surprised you want to beat my supposed guilt to death. I can tell your intent is serious as hell so there's almost nothing I myself can say to change that opinion and it doesn't fit my Townie impression of you to tunnel that hard. I also don't think you as either alignment would challenge me directly at this stage so I don't see how you hanging onto this is beneficial to general discussion. In other words, I don't get you.

Only reason I'm pushing you so hard at the moment is because half the fucking town wants to clear you. I don't want you to become a dropped case, so I've had to focus my efforts to asking people to defend themselves and their opinions. Namely opinions on you since I don't see much of a refutation for my accusation. Which would, as far as I can tell, be a proof that your speculation has been pro town or that you've produced decent opinions on other players. That's somewhat subjective but I'll try to be fair ^-^.

So, how about this, if you want to defend yourself, link the posts where you have produced solid, decent opinions, or explain to me where your set up speculation has aided the town more than analysis would have. I think the first option is probably more likely to sway me since it would mean I was mistaken.

Though admittedly, that post at least gets it's act together. Apparently the only parts where our suspicion lists differ are on you and Bard. And you obviously aren't going to accuse yourself of being scum. I'll be honest, I could swap out Bard for Jam. Alice doesn't bug me as much as he did earlier. When he DOES post, outside of that one terrible post, he does seem to post content and relatively decent content. Then again, there is a possibility I've been glazing and missing critical things.

And...wow...that was well caught Serp. I...um...completely missed that.

Quote
Putting a crazy strategy out there to have some holes poked in it is one thing, but I have a really hard time believing that Kiro's reasoning would be so bad as to let this point pass as town, especially while simultaneously claiming that my plan is too dangerous.  Whether or not he's scum with Kefit, I'm pegging Kiro as  likely scum with a path to the endgame mapped out.  Given a choice, I'd like to clean up the loose ends before dealing with him, but I should state for the record that if Kiro were to take on any of the unchallenged players right now, I'd be voting for his opponent.

This is further decent but...I don't like the reasoning. You are giving Kiro a Burden of Proficiency here. He's a good player, but he's human. People make mistakes.

That said I still think he's likely to be scum, I just don't want to take that avenue to proving it.

##Vote Kefit

I think this move was pretty obvious.



Kitten4u

  • Ochophobic
  • *
  • Too cute to kill
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #393 on: February 18, 2010, 04:44:32 PM »
Posting from school, so I don't have much time to say stuff.

I've already said my piece on Ciato so...
##Vote Kefit

Granted I really, really dislike that Kefit volenteered himself to be on the "winning" side.  I still dislike anyone that says quick challgenges are okay and anyone that wants to be on the winning end of a duel because both those things seem to favor scum in this set-up.  I agree with Serp's analysis on Kefit's proposition.  The only good scum are dead scum imo.

I still have a gut town read on Bardiche.  Kiro hasn't looked scummy to me either.  I'll do a reread of the game later to see if I'm missing something.  Really I think I just need to reread the game again.  I'll put up a scum list after I do.
My favorite mythical creature? The honest politician.
A life cool.. where can I download one of those?
Hurray for apathy!

DA|Tumblr

Jam-Kiske

  • i am not witty
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #394 on: February 18, 2010, 05:10:34 PM »
##Vote Keft

Really all that can be said about Ciato has been said.

Kefit may look somewhat shady, but if you think about it: someone has to volunteer to kill who we think is scum. So... it's not the best to say someone is scummy for doing so as we'd never get anywhere that way.

Of course if Ciato flips town, then Kefit will surely be scummy but otherwise it wouldn't seem to be the case.

Jam-Kiske

  • i am not witty
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #395 on: February 18, 2010, 05:10:59 PM »
Holy shit I can't spell.
##Kefit

>>;

Chaore

  • Kai Ni Recipient Many Years Late
  • *
  • You Finally Did It, Kadokawa.
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #396 on: February 18, 2010, 05:22:44 PM »
##Vote: Kefit

Obvious move.

We'll get whatever we do happen to get from this duel. As far as it comes to Kefit, there isn't much of a reason to nitpick him when it really does kind of come down to a flip.

I do have to wonder why the hell you're nitpicking Kefit to damn Kiro though, Serp. I mean. What? That is the same as pointing Bard's flaws out and then accusing me. That just seems like you're looking for a bad point instead of NOTICING a bad point. As if huhrm, Kiro is already scum to you?

Especially given the fact the point is easily missable and SEVERAL OTHER PLAYERS MISSED IT. Including Alex, Jam, UK, and Bard. And I probably missed a few players too. This could be nit picking for Kefit, sure, but for KIRO? What the hell, Serp?

Ninja: Oh. Hey kitten.

I've tried typing but I can simply say I -don't get you-. Its like you refuse to believe anyone could have an opposite viewpoint. It makes my head HURT how close minded you are being.

Please answer why I can not dare disagree with you without a 12 page essay why. Then I can make my call on if you're just being stupid of scummy.

Ninja 2: Oh hello other kitten.

Ninja 3: And lo jam.

Have I seriously spent an hour trying to comprehend Kitten 1? I need to lie down. Or take a shower.

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #397 on: February 18, 2010, 05:24:24 PM »
Quote
I've tried typing but I can simply say I -don't get you-. Its like you refuse to believe anyone could have an opposite viewpoint. It makes my head HURT how close minded you are being.

Please answer why I can not dare disagree with you without a 12 page essay why. Then I can make my call on if you're just being stupid of scummy.

You don't need a 12 page essay. But you DO need to support your statements. Which you have not done yet. I'm not asking for a lot. See what I asked of Kiro. It's not that hard, especially since I link most of Kiro's posts anyway.

Why are you trying to avoid a simple question?


FinnKaenbyou

  • Formerly Roukanken
  • *
  • blub blub nya
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #398 on: February 18, 2010, 05:27:23 PM »
Sweet Jesus words words words I'm totally lost

Want a vote count before I put a vote on Kefit. Don't want to cut discussion sho- actually, I sort of do if it's just gonna be indeceipherable walls. T_T

Edible

  • One part the F?hrer, one part the Pope
  • *
  • It's the inevitable return, baby
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #399 on: February 18, 2010, 05:38:05 PM »
Uh.

Day 3 Challenge - Kefit vs Ciato
Kefit (7) - El Cid, Kiro, Serpentarius, UncertainKitten, Kitten4u, Jam-Kiske, Chaore

Cudgel, make no noise. <_<

Edible

  • One part the F?hrer, one part the Pope
  • *
  • It's the inevitable return, baby
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #400 on: February 18, 2010, 05:49:02 PM »
Ciato, playing Sugiura Midori, Adventurer Archaeologist, was forced to meet with the slimy tentacle business ends of a gigantic squid.  Makimakimakimakimaki...

It is now the Dawn of Day 4.  I don't think anyone was expecting the vote period of the day to last less than 12 hours, so I may start Day 4 early before Carthrat gets here.  Feel free to discuss whatever as long as it isn't event within the game.

Kefit

  • The Wild Draw Four of America
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #401 on: February 18, 2010, 07:28:11 PM »
Well, that was fast.

ps Tentacle monsters are really more a Yukino thing.

Edible

  • One part the F?hrer, one part the Pope
  • *
  • It's the inevitable return, baby
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #402 on: February 18, 2010, 07:48:54 PM »
Well, that was fast.

ps Tentacle monsters are really more a Yukino thing.

Go watch ep 6 of Otome.

Kefit

  • The Wild Draw Four of America
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #403 on: February 18, 2010, 08:03:56 PM »
Hey now, we are dealing with Shiho Munakata. Not Shiho Huit. Very different people, I assure you!

Edible

  • One part the F?hrer, one part the Pope
  • *
  • It's the inevitable return, baby
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #404 on: February 18, 2010, 08:09:12 PM »
Psh, the only difference between the two is one's probably gay.

Bardiche

  • Mafia: Worst Game Ever
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 3)
« Reply #405 on: February 18, 2010, 08:42:01 PM »
Waitwat.

Carthrat

  • HITLER OF LURKERS
  • MEIN MAIDENKAMPF
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #406 on: February 18, 2010, 08:59:53 PM »

the soul still burns in

1. Kazahana Mashiro is bardiche, who should've been midori *
2. Minagi Mikoto kitten4u likes cats can you tell
4. Kikukawa Yukino alice has a thing for tentacles
6. Higurashi Akane chaos will probably die first
7. Yuuki Nao kiro climbed up the water spout
8. Himeno Fumi serpentarius is a teacatching fiend
9. Okuzaki Akira roukanken epitomizes gender identification issues
10. Munakata Shiho kefit can strangle you with her hair
11. Fujino Shizuru uncertainkitten hates old people with passion
12. Alyssa Searrs jam-kiske's ion cannon is ready
15. Harada Chie cid couldn't wait for fatal frame mafia
16. Miyu Grear siralex was forced out the coolant tank

all sparkly now

13. Sanada Yukariko (pesco) was defeated by Kazahana Mashiro (bardiche) in The Battle of the Unexpected Motorist
14. Senou Aoi (kilga) was defeated by Miyu Grear (siralex) and Sugiura Midori(ciato) in The Battle of the Misplaced Bullet!
14. Kuga Natsuki (eviltom) was defeated by Miyu Grear (siralex) and Sugiura Midori(ciato) in The Battle of the Misplaced Bullet!
5. Sugiura Midori (ciato) was defeated by Munakata Shiho (kefit) in The Battle of the Unfortunate Crush!


It is Round 4! The Hime Star is bloated and foul! Today, it is a POLICE CRACKDOWN! All players who have won a duel are under investigation by incompetent policemen and may not participate in duels today! They cannot challenge, nor be challenged! These players are Ranmilia, Bardiche, and Kefit!

You have 24 hours to select who dukes it out in the backstreets.

Chaore

  • Kai Ni Recipient Many Years Late
  • *
  • You Finally Did It, Kadokawa.
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #407 on: February 18, 2010, 09:02:28 PM »
I am an idiot. That is all.

Bardiche

  • Mafia: Worst Game Ever
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #408 on: February 18, 2010, 09:12:58 PM »
Incompetent policemen? I will not stand for incompetent policemen on my campus!

Someone, please remove these people!

Question, Carthrat! If the aforementioned power to turn the Day's proceedings into a regular Mafia Day is employed, are Kefit, Alex and I eligible targets for Hammer or do we acquire Hammer immunity through some bizarre turn of events?

Jam-Kiske

  • i am not witty
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #409 on: February 18, 2010, 09:14:45 PM »
Might it be a good idea to turn the day into a regular game and lynch one of those 3 as they were kind of being targeted anyway or should be just look at everyone else to find who may be scummy?

Jam-Kiske

  • i am not witty
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #410 on: February 18, 2010, 09:15:22 PM »
First option of course assumes it would work out that we'd be able to lynch them if we turned the game to regular mafia...

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #411 on: February 18, 2010, 09:27:46 PM »
Yay! I'm 2 for 5!

Unfortunately the two I got right were so blatantly fucking obvious I really can't take credit for that.

So I can't have Bard today? Can we kill CHAOS now? Or should we go with Jam's plan and lynch one of the three that can't be challenged?


Edible

  • One part the F?hrer, one part the Pope
  • *
  • It's the inevitable return, baby
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #412 on: February 18, 2010, 09:31:20 PM »
Question, Carthrat! If the aforementioned power to turn the Day's proceedings into a regular Mafia Day is employed, are Kefit, Alex and I eligible targets for Hammer or do we acquire Hammer immunity through some bizarre turn of events?

Today's ability prevents you three from challenging or being challenged.  Nothing else.

Kefit

  • The Wild Draw Four of America
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #413 on: February 18, 2010, 09:54:07 PM »
So far so good. Unfortunately I can't even offer the Alex vs Bard proposal I planned for today in the case of a Ciato scum flip, but on the bright side that can always wait for another day. Guess it's time for some scum huntin'. Hopefully I (or someone else) will prove more effective at it than Bard has been.

By the way, I didn't mean that we should never kill neutralized scum. Rather, getting rid of them isn't an immediate priority until the number of players shrinks down a bit. At this point we've killed two of the scum and are sitting at 12 players total, so we've got a nice cushion to work with if we assume that the game started with six or less scum. A Ciato town flip would have left the town with the same amount of "safe" time if we started with five or less scum.

I should be back with some actual scum hunting shenanigans later tonight. For now I'll say that, based on responses to my actions last night, I've got a gut suspicion on Kiro, UK, and Serp.

Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #414 on: February 18, 2010, 10:00:58 PM »
Might it be a good idea to turn the day into a regular game and lynch one of those 3 as they were kind of being targeted anyway or should be just look at everyone else to find who may be scummy?

I'm curious as to why you include Kefit in this list. Bard/Alex were in matches where a townie died, sure, but Kefit killed scum. Do you have previous misgivings about him that I haven't noticed, or...? I dunno. The only reason I could see is thinking he jumped into a situation where scum was obviously going to get killed anyway (Ciato was agreed on near universally as the lynch target) in order to gain townie cred. The possibility of that is something I acknowledge, but really not enough to consider killing him in the near future.

Bardiche

  • Mafia: Worst Game Ever
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #415 on: February 18, 2010, 10:22:48 PM »
Right, so if you really, but then you must really want to pit Alex against me.

Here's my proposal:

Use the power to turn this into a regular Mafia Day and have either Alex hammer me or me hammer Alex. That way one of us wins the 'duel', all you need to do is vote for who you want to die.

I'm strongly against that proposal because it is a waste of time. I don't think Alex is scum at this juncture and think it is rather silly of Kefit to say, on day 3, "Hey it's time for some scumhunting!", add an underhanded jab at me which is kind of to me "HEY GUYS ONLY BARD WAS SCUMHUNTING UP TILL NOW".

I'm going to do a re-read to gauge the accuracy of the above representation of how I read Kefit's latest communique and I pray to all heavens that I haven't been the only one scumhunting so far.

Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #416 on: February 18, 2010, 11:30:04 PM »
I'd suggest we hold off on using K4U's power until we hit a day with obviously horrendous conditions. I don't think today counts because the people who've won matches don't really look that bad to me, certainly not enough to spend a limited charge power role just for the sake of getting them out of the way one day earlier. Alex in particular seems fairly pointless to pursue since him being scum would leave us with no conceivable reason for Tom to have behaved as rashly as he did. Scum didn't need to have three team members in that match; Ciato was enough to get them a kill out of it.

I'd again suggest Chaos as an option for today. Kiro is still acceptable as town champion (also still willing to be the challenger myself, of course).

FinnKaenbyou

  • Formerly Roukanken
  • *
  • blub blub nya
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #417 on: February 18, 2010, 11:32:47 PM »
Okay, I'm still lost.

Welp, I'd request that someone challenges Serp. I'm sorry, I really don't like the way he tried to validate Alex vs. Scum!Ciato. His claim that 'people we think are Town are likely scum' reeks of stupid WIFOM.
Quote
If Kilga thought that it was a good idea, and he was town, I don't see how my holding to that idea could possibly look scummy, even if you don't agree with it.
This is what we call 'regurgitating a case'. You're basically saying 'the dead guy said it, he can't be wrong because he's Town, and therefore I can't be wrong!'

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #418 on: February 18, 2010, 11:42:49 PM »
Quote
I'd again suggest Chaos as an option for today. Kiro is still acceptable as town champion (also still willing to be the challenger myself, of course).

When did you do that? Or was it yesterday? Only person I've noticed advocating the CHAOS dying today is me.

And seriously, do I have to get into "Why the fuck do you think Kiro is town" discussion again?

Quote
Welp, I'd request that someone challenges Serp. I'm sorry, I really don't like the way he tried to validate Alex vs. Scum!Ciato. His claim that 'people we think are Town are likely scum' reeks of stupid WIFOM.

Where did he explicitly say it like that? It feels like misrep.


Chaore

  • Kai Ni Recipient Many Years Late
  • *
  • You Finally Did It, Kadokawa.
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 4)
« Reply #419 on: February 19, 2010, 12:08:48 AM »
If I'm going to go down per town opinion, I'd prefer Ciato do it so you guys get some info on his claim. Which I'd hope you guys not mess the hell up on. In fact, there is absolutely no reason for Ciato to NOT be the challenger. If he is scum, this nabs us third scum down. If he is not, we get this magical power of his, which should probably nab third scum. If I am scum, then we get the third scum down anyway.

So. ##Fakevote: Ciato v. Chaos.

Any good objections to this?