Alex (and others who made similar statements): I am being deliberately vague, yes, because I don't know what roles scum has at their disposal and I don't want to make it easier for them to counter things. I am aware this isn't as helpful as it could be but have no real choice; I don't imagine I'll get more than one shot and don't want to make it any more likely than it already is that it'll get fouled up by scum intervention. Given K4U's claim, and since I'm being pressed on the matter, I may as well confirm that this--
It seems possible/probable that winning challenges replenishes charges of limited use abilities?
--seems to be a running theme for this game's power roles. I start with zero charges. This--
I also dislike Cid's proposition on the sheer fact that he is outright pretty much trying to get a kill here.
--is in fact true, though in addition to a desire to scumhunt. If I need to kill someone to use my role, I want to make sure whoever goes down is the scummiest player in sight. I presently think this is Ciato, hence why I want to take advantage of the fact that there's someone around whose guilt I'm confident of. I hate asking for a duel and I hate claiming, but there seems no other way of arranging to have a say in whatever challenge I'm involved in. The longer I waited, the less likely it seemed that would be, and I'm already worried about being dragged into the next 2-vs-2 match once this is used.
Maybe I'm being too paranoid about claiming given that there's no traditional nightphase here, but I have to assume Carth put something unpleasant on the scum side to balance out the town power roles; roleblocker sitting on me in the future is probably already a possibility if such a thing exists in this game, but even if it doesn't, I'm not willing to bait any more specific roles there might be by going into explicit detail about what I have and what I intend to do with it. I
will look on more specific rolefishery with suspicion.
Yes, there are still blanks here and that may not reassure people. If this doesn't leave you confident enough to put me in a match, then I'll abide by that decision. But I remain skeptical that Alex vs. Ciato as today's match is in our best interest despite Kilga approving of it. Jam covered this well: most of us seem to think there's at most one scum in the pair of them, and if we guess wrong on who that is then we've given scum a kill. I believe the culprit here is Ciato but always acknowledge the possibility that I could be wrong and want to minimize the chance of making that error. Kiro looks pretty safe to me personally if we want another challenger; hasn't said anything to set off alarms. I'd really like some broad feedback here rather than just from the two people who said "No, that's not good enough" (one of whom was Chaos anyway, who I've felt vaguely unsettled about for a while now. I'm going to reread some posts to see if I can properly articulate why).
Ninja'd. Can't say I agree with Rou. It's an unusual setup and the way K4U described the role doesn't sound unbelievable to me.