Author Topic: Himelander Mafia Thread (Over! Scum Win!)  (Read 58504 times)

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #240 on: February 15, 2010, 09:59:12 PM »
People have been posting. I guess people missed this:

Quote
Or, I could ask everyone to make a request of information of me that I'll provide, which would both answer questions and allow me to integrate back in the game, if that makes sense.

This has benefits outside of re engaging me in the game. People as smart as yourselves can catch what I want. And no, it's nothing big or gamebreaking, but I think it's at least a slight help.


Bardiche

  • Mafia: Worst Game Ever
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #241 on: February 15, 2010, 10:01:01 PM »
There's no need for me to tell you what I got because it's a null read and it's completely worthless insofar as assisting town or scum goes.

Kilgamayan

  • True
  • *
  • The Real Treasure Is You
    • Let's Play Super Marisa World
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #242 on: February 15, 2010, 11:14:09 PM »
General summary of tl;dr summary post earlier, just in case any of it wasn't clear.

I like: Kiro, Serp, Cid, and to a lesser extent Jam and K4U.
I am neutral on: Kefit and Roukan.
I do not like: Bard, Chaore, and to a lesser extent UK and Alice.

Or, I could ask everyone to make a request of information of me that I'll provide, which would both answer questions and allow me to integrate back in the game, if that makes sense.

- Which of Alex and Ciato do you think is Tom's scum buddy?

- Who not involved in today's challenge do you think is scum?
[22:40:12] <Drake> "guys i donwloaded esod but its not workan"
[22:40:21] <Drake> REPORTED
[22:40:25] <NaturallyOccurringChoja> PROBATED
[22:40:30] <Drake> ORGASM
[22:40:32] <NaturallyOccurringChoja> FUCK YEAH

[22:28:39] <Edible> Mafia would be a much easier game if we were playing "spot the asshole"

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #243 on: February 15, 2010, 11:19:27 PM »
Quote
- Which of Alex and Ciato do you think is Tom's scum buddy?

I have a minimal read on both of them. I'd want to guess Ciato to be honest, but I have to reread both of them sometime tonight.

Quote
- Who not involved in today's challenge do you think is scum?

I still don't like Bardiche. The fight I had with him was basically him trying to come up with ways to nitpick my behavior and it didn't work very well IMO. Oh, and fiat of Pesco being right usually, but I won't try to build a case on that. Then he disappears, though supposedly that's explained, and I'd be rather hypocritical to call him out on that.



Jam-Kiske

  • i am not witty
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #244 on: February 15, 2010, 11:59:08 PM »
Good to see some words from people who know what they're doing.

This setup leads to confusion... Honestly, it's hard to figure out where we should go from here as any time we could have had for discussion on everyone has been nuked by people instantly challenging each other and drawing our attention to them...

Tom has yet to post again, and it'd be nice to see him do so before his seemingly inevitable death....

Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #245 on: February 16, 2010, 12:32:30 AM »
This setup leads to confusion... Honestly, it's hard to figure out where we should go from here as any time we could have had for discussion on everyone has been nuked by people instantly challenging each other and drawing our attention to them...

I think at this point you can at least take comfort from the fact that anyone else pulling this will get killed for it.

FinnKaenbyou

  • Formerly Roukanken
  • *
  • blub blub nya
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #246 on: February 16, 2010, 12:52:33 AM »
Just saying I'm still reading and I have no idea what to contribute.

Alex vs. Ciato feels like a bad idea, because then we risk giving a win to scum if we pick wrong. I'd suggest (assuming he flips Town) that we determine before we issue the challenge which of the two we want to lynch, then pit them against someone who Kilga saw as Town. That reduces the risk of us giving a win to scum in the case of a mislynch.

FinnKaenbyou

  • Formerly Roukanken
  • *
  • blub blub nya
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #247 on: February 16, 2010, 12:53:10 AM »
EBWOP: Because that came out badly, 'he' in this instance is Kilga.

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #248 on: February 16, 2010, 12:58:04 AM »
What about Pesco's opinion, Rou? It's entirely possible he was right about you. Perhaps you should be pitted against one of them?


?lice Bl?ckb?rn

  • The real Alice Blackbarn!
  • *
  • "OH DESIRE"
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #249 on: February 16, 2010, 12:59:57 AM »
First off, the next person that Leeroy Jenkinses into a challenge without letting the rest of Town discuss and consult about it first gets vig'd by me IRL. Seriously, what the fuck. Anyway, on topic here:

It is basically guaranteed that Tom is Scum. There is no way I can justify his behaviour as Townie here: if he really was Town and concerned about Alex setting up lynches, why did he not consult Town first at all? Throw in a couple more points here that have been discussed to death above, and you get that his behaviour is strictly Anti-Town no matter how you look at it and only makes sense from a Scum standpoint.

Kilga, I'm fairly confident so far is Town. At least there's nothing that's been hinting me towards the opposite so far. I am vaguely curious why I am on the "I do not like:" tier: is it solely due to lack of posting?

What I don't like about Bard is, if his ability really is so useless to the game and unimportant, why is he trying so hard to hide it and not simply reveal it? This bothers me. It could either mean he has acquired an actually useful power for Town, in which case hiding it would perhaps be the sensical thing to do, or it's something that's likely Anti-Town. Now, hiding Pro-Town abilities is normally a good thing because lol Scum Nightkill - but that doesn't exist in this game: so again, why is he being so evasive? That + the rest of the things he's said today (i.e. a general lack of content overall) worry me a bit.

UK needs to stop being lazy and actually read through the game. Christ, if the rest of us can do it, why can't you?

Anyway, onto the real issue here: Alex vs. Ciato. I'm leaning Town on Alex at the moment. There are a couple things that are iffy here, the "lining up lynches" comment is a minor complaint, not so much for recommending a challenge for D2 on D1 but stating that it should be the challenge regardless of Pesco's flipped alignment, but simultaneously I haven't had much of an issue with his reasoning, Tom looks horrible in general, his strat of voting for challenges is fairly Pro-Town at least in the first couple days (where Scum doesn't control near-majority of the voting block), and furthermore Tom's reaction doesn't make sense assuming Alex is Scum: as a Scum gambit, ScumTom+TownKilga vs. ScumAlex+TownCiato doesn't make any more sense from a heads standpoint than ScumTom+TownCiato vs. ScumAlex+TownWhoever. The only way this would work in their favour is if both Alex and Ciato are Scum, then this gives an overall positive amount of heads. But then D3 one of the remaining Scum will die, and it's fairly certain D4 the other will. So overall, a net loss. Combined, this makes me think that Alex is probably Town in this matchup.

Now, Ciato, I will admit, I've found so far to be nigh-unreadable. D1 her posts so far have been on the Sodium/Kanako/NEETz scale of Fairly Useless(TM), which makes me want to suspect her as Scum out of principle, but this is obviously a bad idea, so yeah. D2 her one sole post seems to be decent, though there is some element of AoE. Now, matchup-wise. Let's assume TownAlex, and TownKilga (btw: matchup-wise, if Tom is Scum, it makes no sense at all for him to take Scum-Kilga down with him, considering there has been literally no suspicion on Kilga so far. Could he have been thinking that maybe Kilga would be able to defend him from dying? Plausible, but still terrible. It makes far more sense for Tom to recruit a random Townie if he goes the suicidal route than one of his fellow Scum, especially one that nobody has suspected so far. This, combined with the general lack of complaints from Kilga, makes me near-100% confident that Kilga is actually Town). So, assuming TownCiato: TownAlex+Town? vs. ScumTom+TownCiato as opposed to TownAlex+TownCiato vs. ScumTom+Town? are in this case identical matchup-wise, and I cannot see Tom actually expecting to win his Leeroy Jenkins attempt considering: A) What happened to Pesco D1, B) His D1 posting, C) His challenge reasoning, etc. I would really love to see another post from Tom clearing up some of this, but at this point it really seems as if he's gone suicidal. Now, it doesn't make sense to do if Ciato is Town and Alex is Town, but if Alex is Town and Ciato is Scum, suddenly it makes sense: Tom saw Alex's proposal, panicked, and decided to go out with a bang while simultaneously attempting to confuse Town further and attempt to get rid of one of Alex or Kilga. So, leaning Scum on this one, though potentially Town: ScumTom would have forced tomorrow to be an Alex vs. Ciato Town vs. Town fight, which would have gotten one of them lynched, and then D4 another Scum would go and clean up the other one of them for a head. This is actually distinctly plausible, and thus I'm not sure in the end. Future posts from Ciato would be very much appreciated as a result, i.e. damnit, post more (why yes, I know I'm being hypocritical, shut up :P).

The other option, of course, is that Tom is legitimately Town, who knee-jerk reacted to Alex's message, and decided to challenge him quickly. I could actually slightly believe this, IF it were not for the team mechanic: it is strictly Anti-Town for you to recruit someone without any consultation from the rest of Town if you are going to Leeroy Jenkins into a match, let alone the act of Leeroy Jenkinsing into a match to begin with, as has been discussed to death on Day Freaking One.

Apart from that, don't like UK, Bard worries me a bit, and most of Chaore's posts make me wonder if he is writing in English or in Hieroglyphics. Seriously. I honestly don't think there's that much more to be discussed today barring a post from Tom, I will do another reread of today after this post, but I doubt I'll find anything particularly interesting. And yes, seconding Kilga, tomorrow's challenge basically must be Alex vs. Ciato here, anyone who Leeroy Jenkinses into something else needs to be ground into the pavement with extreme prejudice.

@Roukan: Hm. You bring up an interesting point. Ignoring the possibility of Kilga accidentally picking a Scum to fight whichever of Alex or Ciato, if we could narrow down their alignments somehow and then only off the one we consider to be Scum, then that is a net win for Town. At the same time, BOTH Alex and Ciato being Scum is a distinct possibility, albeit a minor one. Would want more input from the rest of Town on this.
"Oh, great. Another game where I get screwed by Kilga." ~ Carthrat

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #250 on: February 16, 2010, 01:06:51 AM »
I might do it later. Rest of your wall of text is logical.


One little problem though. Everyone has already discussed everything you just said, with less words.

Are you trying to look pro town or do you have something new to say?


Chaore

  • Kai Ni Recipient Many Years Late
  • *
  • You Finally Did It, Kadokawa.
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #251 on: February 16, 2010, 01:12:31 AM »
What about Pesco's opinion, Rou? It's entirely possible he was right about you. Perhaps you should be pitted against one of them?

Why hello there subtle point.

I am going to say I can see Kilga and the rest of us 'accidentally' choosing the wrong person and still giving scum a win. Whoever we chose the winner to be, we best be careful about. In fact, it is just the same case as Alex vs. Ciato with a larger pool of contestants.

Which gives us a higher chance of picking town, actually. Unless Kilga hilariously managed to pick all scum.

Ninja: Oh hey Alice. See you still haven't learned to read fucking english.

As for Alex and Ciato both being scum... I don't see why Alex would AGREE with Ciato+Alex. This means scum loses no matter what. On the same note, I don't actually know why Ciato would suggest Me vs. Alex, other than to go in and say 'Shiiit! Chaos = Scum, Better snipe him down. >: <'

They're probably not both scum. Both town? Possibly, but fairly unlikely.

?lice Bl?ckb?rn

  • The real Alice Blackbarn!
  • *
  • "OH DESIRE"
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #252 on: February 16, 2010, 01:17:22 AM »
One little problem though. Everyone has already discussed everything you just said, with less words.
See comment about: discussed to death. There really isn't little more to add about the whole debacle today other than the fact that Tom is almost certainly Scum and needs to die, Kilga is almost certainly Town and is going down with the ship sadly, Alex is Probably Townie but maybe not and Ciato is Probably Scum but maybe not. As for the rest of the people here, that's what the reread I'm about to do right now is for. Thanks.
"Oh, great. Another game where I get screwed by Kilga." ~ Carthrat

FinnKaenbyou

  • Formerly Roukanken
  • *
  • blub blub nya
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #253 on: February 16, 2010, 01:18:59 AM »
What about Pesco's opinion, Rou? It's entirely possible he was right about you. Perhaps you should be pitted against one of them?
As much as I'd like that, I don't think the rest of Town has the same faith in me that Pesco did. >_>

UncertainJakutten

  • Then you should get out of the way when I tell you
  • Do you not trust my aim?
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #254 on: February 16, 2010, 01:23:22 AM »
See comment about: discussed to death. There really isn't little more to add about the whole debacle today other than the fact that Tom is almost certainly Scum and needs to die, Kilga is almost certainly Town and is going down with the ship sadly, Alex is Probably Townie but maybe not and Ciato is Probably Scum but maybe not. As for the rest of the people here, that's what the reread I'm about to do right now is for. Thanks.

Then why did you post a wall of text that we'll have to read several times throughout the course of the game that adds nothing new?

I don't believe you are town, Alice.

As much as I'd like that, I don't think the rest of Town has the same faith in me that Pesco did. >_>

Is that where you stand at the moment?

Quote
I am going to say I can see Kilga and the rest of us 'accidentally' choosing the wrong person and still giving scum a win. Whoever we chose the winner to be, we best be careful about. In fact, it is just the same case as Alex vs. Ciato with a larger pool of contestants.

Which gives us a higher chance of picking town, actually. Unless Kilga hilariously managed to pick all scum.

hmm? I think I understand what you are saying here but could you elaborate more clearly?


FinnKaenbyou

  • Formerly Roukanken
  • *
  • blub blub nya
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #255 on: February 16, 2010, 01:27:05 AM »
Is that where you stand at the moment?
The one person who pretty much everyone thinks is Town, Kilga, listed me as neutral. So yeah.

Bardiche

  • Mafia: Worst Game Ever
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #256 on: February 16, 2010, 01:29:26 AM »
I have no clue what UncertainKitten is trying to accomplish here.

Alice affirmed where she/he/it stands at this moment, attacking over a wall of text that we'd "have to read again" is... well, scratch that, this place has weirder habits.

Anyway, personally I think it's a great idea to let me take out Alex and Ciato next Day(s).

Jam-Kiske

  • i am not witty
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #257 on: February 16, 2010, 01:32:04 AM »
I don't think we should put Alex vs Ciato tomorrow just in case... though I'm not sure who can be trusted to be the uber townie.

Rou doesn't seem untrustworthy per se... the fact that you can never know is going to make this irritating. Accursed setup.

Chaore

  • Kai Ni Recipient Many Years Late
  • *
  • You Finally Did It, Kadokawa.
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #258 on: February 16, 2010, 01:36:28 AM »
Well. Alex vs. Ciato is a straight up 50% chance that scum gets a head.

Assuming we choose a town from the pair, and one of Kilga's choices, We have 4 people to choose scum from.

If there is 1 scum in kilga's choices, its a 25% chance, 2 scum, its a 50% like alex vs. ciato, 3 it becomes a 75% chance. All of them being scum means that scum gets a head.

If we expect Kilga doesn't accidentally clear too many scum, we have a better chance of scum not getting a head than if we just went Alex vs. Ciato.

This is actually on top of the 50% we actually choose the town of the pair, so the percents are a lot less, I think.

Summarized: Like the idea, it actually improves the chances we get this right.

Anyway, personally I think it's a great idea to let me take out Alex and Ciato next Day(s).

Ahehahahahaha no.

Jam-Kiske

  • i am not witty
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #259 on: February 16, 2010, 01:38:42 AM »
Yeah not trusting Bard either.

Not particularly scummy, but not very townie either methinks.
Still too unsure to even think of trusting you.
Sorry bro

Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #260 on: February 16, 2010, 01:38:47 AM »
@Roukan: Hm. You bring up an interesting point. Ignoring the possibility of Kilga accidentally picking a Scum to fight whichever of Alex or Ciato, if we could narrow down their alignments somehow and then only off the one we consider to be Scum, then that is a net win for Town. At the same time, BOTH Alex and Ciato being Scum is a distinct possibility, albeit a minor one. Would want more input from the rest of Town on this.

Yeah, personally, I highly doubt they're both scum. That would involve Tom being the worst scum player ever or a barrel of WIFOM that I'm not going to touch. Given that...

I was actually about to request that I be involved in the duel tomorrow, or the day after if that's the soonest it can be arranged. If it's not strictly necessary for tomorrow to Alex vs. Ciato (and I'm not sure it is) then I'd like to put my name in to be the opponent of whoever we chose from today's match. Reason why is complicated and I'd rather go into it after seeing the flips for today's challenge, but I didn't want this to come out of the blue tomorrow.

Chaore

  • Kai Ni Recipient Many Years Late
  • *
  • You Finally Did It, Kadokawa.
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #261 on: February 16, 2010, 01:41:11 AM »
Uuuuuhhh.

You're saying this in a game where the reason you most want to be in the lynching line is if you're scum.

Seriously, Cid?

Bardiche

  • Mafia: Worst Game Ever
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #262 on: February 16, 2010, 01:42:22 AM »
Hey, I know I'm Town most of all. Of course my preference goes out to having me do all the killing. The worst I can do is anonymously jabber to anyone after every duel.

Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #263 on: February 16, 2010, 01:43:31 AM »
Also not really down with Bard challenge tomorrow given recent skepticism towards him. Personally have a solid middle-of-the-road read on him at present, which is better than outright scummy but not really ideal for what we've been considering tomorrow's challenge will be about.

Responding to Chaos next.

Bardiche

  • Mafia: Worst Game Ever
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #264 on: February 16, 2010, 01:51:52 AM »
 8)

I wasn't actually expecting anyone to seriously consider it; just stating my personal preference because good gracious heavens is this a trainwreck and I don't even know where to begin the analysis and where to bury my face in my hands in absolute despair.

And yeah, I guess if it's such a major point, after the duel I got another use of my power, which someone here can confirm to be mostly senseless. I forgot who I targeted the previous day.

?lice Bl?ckb?rn

  • The real Alice Blackbarn!
  • *
  • "OH DESIRE"
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #265 on: February 16, 2010, 01:58:04 AM »
Quote from: UK
I don't believe you are town, Alice.
So stating my opinion on the current fight today is an Anti-Town action now? Really? The only complaint that is valid there is the Excess Amount of Words, which I will admit is an annoying habit that I need to cut down on, but it is no more intrinsically Anti-Town than your prospensity to start worthless arguments with other people that go on for several pages (see: UK/Bardiche D1. Similar complaint about having to read that over upon every reread applies here. And no, it's not useful for determining alignment, I read the entire thing over in detail and it is 95% back-and-forth juggling of the same couple points over and over). So yeah.

Quote from: CHAOS
And Alex matches in 'Let me just toss something about how the game should go then contribute...nothing?' Hes done more gaming the system than scum hunting, last I checked and maybe I should reread both of them. I'm not sure where I got that impression, but I don't like how I got to that.
This is a weird setup which is distinctly skewed towards Town and requires planning for either faction to win (if Scum doesn't plan, Town can just pick them out or pick themselves out and leave Scum with Insufficient Heads(TM). If Town doesn't plan, then Scum can take over voting and challenges, and swing things their way). As a result, gaming the setup, as much as I hate to say it, is important in this game.

The most bizarre post D2 so far is Ciato's #224: it's not that I disagree with her opinion of CHAOS too much, but why CHAOS vs. Alex? Hm. Assuming she vehemently believes Alex is Scum, which is the impression I get from that post, a Scum vs. Scum duel is mildly useful for Town, whereas a Scum vs. Town duel less so depending on which way it swings. It's impossible to predict things this far ahead, though, which makes me only think this suggestion as downright strange instead of anything worse. The rest of the post is extremely heavy AtE directed at Alex. Not sure what to infer from it, still, though I am not a fan of AtE. I see little reason to change my opinion of Ciato from my post above, so far.

@CHAOS #225: Why you vs. Alex specifically? It's interesting that this idea (moving from Alex vs. Ciato to LikelyTownie vs. the Scummier of Alex and Ciato as the D3 matchup) came up earlier but only gained attention now with Roukan mentioning it. Hm. Hmm. Not sure what to make of this.

Jam is being unreadable again. Similar to RKS Mafia, but this presents the same obvious problems. Argh. Someone to keep an eye out for.

@Bard: why you? You're certainly not in the clear today, not by any means. Also, I'm notably disconcerted that you want to clean up both Alex and Ciato here. Is there any reason we should suspect you to be Townie over someone else?

@El Cid: CHAOS brings up the point I was about to make perfectly.

@Everyone Else: if you are suggesting to be the person who wishes to take out Alex and/or Ciato in the next day or two, please provide a damn good reason for it. It'd be even better if you don't, and rather wait for opinions from Kilga etc first. Thanks. Otherwise, you are giving everyone a perfectly good reason to suspect you, at the moment.

Regarding Roukan: going over his past posts, he seems to miss the one main Scum-Roukan tell I've had for him: namely, regurgitating cases. Beyond that, he hasn't done anything overtly Scummy so far, which gives me a reasonable amount of confidence that he's Town. Still not sure if he's The Right Man For Tomorrow's Job(TM), though.

I really want posts from Kilga, Kefit (where did you go?) and Tom right now, and the sooner the better. Thanks.
"Oh, great. Another game where I get screwed by Kilga." ~ Carthrat

Serp

  • It's all about overwhelming force and irresistible style
  • And in a pinch, style can slide
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #266 on: February 16, 2010, 02:04:02 AM »
I favor putting Alex and Ciato against each other in the next fight.  Using the towniest player to kill one of them gives us the risk that the one killed is town and the one chosen to perform the kill is scum.  That risk may be actually be greater by choosing scummy players to kill each other, but my limiting the number of unflipped players that have gotten away with a kill, we can have a better idea of how many heads scum have claimed, and know when we're in LyLo and play accordingly.  I think that's a fine tradeoff.

Also, I can come forward and say that if Bardiche seems to be telling the truth about his ability, because I'm pretty sure I was the target of it.
[15:13] <Sana> >:<

Bardiche

  • Mafia: Worst Game Ever
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #267 on: February 16, 2010, 02:06:03 AM »
Repeat for Alice: I don't think anyone'd even follow up on it. I don't get why everyone's shuffling around right now either! I mean, if you're that concerned I'm scum, you should get me killed, right? If I'm scum then scum's already got one win right now.

I have an idea for why Tom did what he did and that's why I'm asking him! Obviously it makes no sense whatsoever, but from neither perspective. If he's town he could be trying to get as many town killed as quickly as possible; face it, unless he picked two scum as his opponents there's a good chance he loses 2 town for the price of 1! Or 2 town for no cost at all except to narrow down scum's choices. Or he goes down with scum.

Worst case we lose two town and scum gains two heads, best case we lose one scum, one town and scum gains no heads, assuming TownTom.


Ah right I targeted Serpentarius. Meido meido~~ (you never did come through with the tea. ;_;)

Serp

  • It's all about overwhelming force and irresistible style
  • And in a pinch, style can slide
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #268 on: February 16, 2010, 02:08:17 AM »
I got plenty of maidhood in my last game over there.
[15:13] <Sana> >:<

Ranmilia

  • Multiple Intelligencial Yggdrasil Unit
Re: Himelander Mafia Thread (Day 2, Team Battle!)
« Reply #269 on: February 16, 2010, 02:09:06 AM »
Veeeeerrrry interested to hear Cid's reason now.  It's all but certain to me (and most other people, at a glance) at this point that today's flips will be Tom scum Kilga town, can you talk about why you aren't sure or why this matters to whatever you have to disclose?

I'm not thrilled with being in more challenges, just accepting and acknowledging the fact that Pesco and Tom's behaviors are throwing a lot of doubt on me and it will likely be best for town's peace of mind to have me dead sooner or later.  Preferably later though!

Also, not to say we should cut the day here, but I am astounded at people thinking Tom is going to post again.  Why would he say anything else, he's already essentially claimed scum and is going to be flipping shortly.

I doubt the setup is town favored, it is balanced out by things like this, where the scum get to sacrifice a member already probably on their way out (Tom) to pick up a free "night kill" (Kilga).  We should expect further complications from the Hime Star and scum power roles.