~Beyond the Border~ > Mystia's Stored Games
Yume Nikki Mafia - Waking 2
Edible:
EBWOP: Alice, why's SP scummy in your eyes? I think I missed that argument.
Nietz:
30 minutes remaining.
And you already got what was effectively a 24 hour extension yesterday, remember?
?q:
Half an hour left. Cut...
I wish I could be more of a help, as I'm not particularly fond of an Affinity lynch based on the limited information I have, but frankly we're not going to get four/five people to vote someone else. (that being the difference between now and GWU D4)
?lice Bl?ckb?rn:
This post is MetaTastic(TM) and clears people for reasons that I think are inadequate. It moves on to a case on you that lacks any actual justification beyond "oh hey you're not being obvtown so you're scum", which is certainly enough to suspect someone, but is it really enough to ##Vote them?
This post votes Zakeri while never actually saying why any of the points raised against him actually make him scummy.
Then we run into his latest posts, such as this one, where I really do have to wonder: how does scum!me act different from town!me in the aspects you've raised? All you've ever done is clear or attack people based off of meta, there does not appear to be any actual reasoning behind anything you've ever said or done.
So yeah...I'm voting him for what is essentially an indiscriminate use of meta combined with the fact that he hasn't actually done any scumhunting whatsoever.
@Rou: last Nietz game was 11 people with 3 scum and 3 town-aligned powers. I wouldn't be so hyper-keen to lynch Affinity at a point where if he is actually telling the truth, he could garner more useful information or pull a hilarious gambit wherein he claims to track his scumbuddy and gets townie cred for it for later use and therefore confirm himself.
This is why playing the setup on D2 is, quite honestly, a horrible idea imho.
?lice Bl?ckb?rn:
Zakeri has one vote on him and myself, you and Edible are around, and I assume Affinity too?