| ~Beyond the Border~ > Mystia's Stored Games |
| Numbers Mafia - Scum Win, Q.E.D. |
| << < (47/52) > >> |
| Pesco:
I prefer being myself tyvm |
| UncertainJakutten:
--- Quote ---I don't at all endorse approaching Day 1 with an "I'm not considering alignments" attitude. I caught Zengar for taking a scummy approach to Seniwac's retardation, and I caught VgT for taking a scummy approach to the day in general. If this isn't what you mean, then I'm a bit confused as to what you're getting at. --- End quote --- That's not quite what I'm getting at. It's...hard to explain what I'm after. Because, on the one hand, I know that stances need to be taken. But, on the other, I think that I tend to overcommit to stances. And they color my thoughts for the rest of the game. So I'm trying to come up with a way to prevent that overcommitment D1. So I can assess D1 with an uncolored view, preferably during the night phase, and have reads on D2 that should hopefully be better reasoned, if that makes since. I'd love advice on this to be honest. --- Quote ---I did consider that you could have been baiting with it. But think about it, you weren't thinking too much about what you said in that post while I was quite happy to find that edge. My sample for that tell is every instance of your conversations that have included Serp's name after you started calling him your master. --- End quote --- Hmm? I'd like to hear more on this. |
| FinnKaenbyou:
Well, after that trainwreck... I've only got one thing to say to the Town... Your number's up. Okay, I admit I haven't been following too closely for the sake of my own sanity, but I have one comment to make. Why the heck did no-one look at Nietz after D2? He was the deciding vote between the Zak/Serp wagons, and he was scum pulling it away from his buddy. The most obvious setup possible, and Town managed to miss it. ...See, this is why I don't play anymore. |
| Pesco:
How often do you say 1: Serpentarius 2: Serp 3: Serpy If you were baiting, I judged that you would use Serpentarius more than once in the game. If it wasn't consistent in usage, it meant your post was unintentional in being formal. The main point being that you only use Serpy when you're fully at ease with him. Since you were town and didn't know his alignment, it was reasonable that you'd be formal with him. --- Quote ---...See, this is why I don't play anymore. --- End quote --- You don't have the bragging rights to be pulling this one I get the right to point out mistakes without being called a hypocrite. What's your point? |
| Kilgamayan:
--- Quote from: UncertainKitten on November 03, 2009, 06:14:38 PM ---Because, on the one hand, I know that stances need to be taken. But, on the other, I think that I tend to overcommit to stances. And they color my thoughts for the rest of the game. So I'm trying to come up with a way to prevent that overcommitment D1. So I can assess D1 with an uncolored view, preferably during the night phase, and have reads on D2 that should hopefully be better reasoned, if that makes since. I'd love advice on this to be honest. --- End quote --- - Do your thing on D1. - Ignore everything that happened D1 on D2 except for the trains. If the D1 flip was town, look at people on the train. If the D1 train was scum, look at people not on it. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |